GIMP 2 for Photographers 471
Jon Allen writes "A glance through any photography magazine will confirm that Adobe Photoshop is the accepted standard image editing software, offering almost unparalleled power and control over your images. However, costing more than many DSLR cameras, for non-professionals it can be a very hard purchase to justify (and of course for Linux users this is a moot point, as Photoshop is not available for their platform). Luckily, the free software community has provided us with an alternative. The GIMP, or Gnu Image Manipulation Program, offers a huge amount of the power of Photoshop but is available at no cost. Additionally GIMP is cross-platform, available for Windows, Mac, Linux, and Unix." Read below for the rest of Jon's review.
The one downside to using GIMP is that most magazines and photography books use Photoshop in their articles and tutorials, so if you do choose GIMP there's a bit more of a learning curve. Now once you're used to GIMP you'll find that many of Photoshop's features have equivalents, albeit with a different user interface, but getting that initial level of experience and familiarity with the software can be rather difficult. The GIMP does come with a manual, but it is really more of a reference guide and while very comprehensive it is not particularly friendly for new users. GIMP 2 for Photographers aims to rectify this.| GIMP 2 for Photographers | |
| author | Klaus Goelker |
| pages | 185 |
| publisher | Rocky Nook / O'Reilly |
| rating | 9/10 |
| reviewer | Jon Allen |
| ISBN | 978-1-933952-03-1 |
| summary | A great book for anyone with more than a passing interest in improving their photos |
Written clearly from a photographer's point of view (the author is a photographer who also teaches image editing), this book takes a task-oriented approach, looking at the types of editing operations that a photographer would require and then showing how to perform each task in the GIMP.
Rather helpfully, the GIMP software (for Windows, Mac, and Linux) is included on the book's accompanying CD. This means that you can follow each tutorial using the exact same version of software as the author, which really helps to build confidence that you're doing everything right.
I already have GIMP installed on OS X, so to test out the instructions in the book I performed an installation from the CD on a clean Microsoft Windows XP machine.
The exact filenames of the installation packages on the CD differ slightly from those in the accompanying README file, but the instructions in the book do list the correct files and after following this procedure the installation went without a hitch. The setup files do not ask any overly 'techie' questions, so it literally took less than 5 minutes to set up a fully working system.
As well as the GIMP application, the CD also includes all of the sample images used in the book, and for each editing tutorial the "final" image is provided so you can check your own work against the expected result.
Even more usefully, the CD contains an electronic copy of the complete book as a PDF file, so you can keep it on your laptop as a reference guide, invaluable when editing images on location (or on holiday).
I'd have to say that this is without a doubt the most useful CD I've ever received with a book. Providing the applications and example files is good, giving readers instant gratification without needing to deal with downloads and websites (which may well have changed after the book went to press). But including the complete book on the CD as well is nothing short of a masterstroke, and something I'd love to see other publishers adopt.
As for the book itself, the author takes us through basic GIMP operations — opening and saving files, cropping, resizing images, and printing. Once these basics are out of the way, the book moves on to a series of examples based on "real-life" image editing scenarios.
These examples are very well chosen, both in the fact that the vast majority of the techniques shown are genuinely useful, but also in the way that they are ordered. Each example introduces a new feature of the software, building up your knowledge as you work through the book. By the end you can expect to be skilled not only in "standard" editing — adjusting color balance, fixing red-eye, removing dust spots, and so on — but also in compositing, perspective correction, lighting and shadow effects, and building panoramic images.
Between the examples there is a good amount of more "reference" type material, with detailed descriptions of the various menus, tool bars, and dialogs you will encounter while using the software. Combined with lots of well-labelled screenshots this strikes a very good balance, ensuring that even after going through all the tutorials you'll still get value from the book as something to refer back to.
Overall the quality of the writing and general production standard is very high indeed. There are some points where it is noticeable that the book was originally published in German, but this never becomes a stumbling block to the reader's understanding. Most importantly though, the author employs the "show, don't tell" philosophy throughout which is key to successful teaching.
In conclusion, I would have no hesitation in recommending GIMP 2 for Photographers to anyone with more than a passing interest in improving their photos. And even if you already use image editing software, the book is well worth a read — I have been using GIMP for several years and still learned a great deal. The accompanying CD is the icing on the cake, making GIMP 2 for Photographers a simply essential purchase.
You can purchase GIMP 2 for Photographers from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
Re:In a lot of ways, Gimp is more intuitive than P (Score:2, Interesting)
For example, in your system a user might usually edit 128x128 px images and have 150 undo steps available. They'd get used to being able to undo 100 brush actions in a row if they needed to revert. But when they edit a larger image they'd inevitably scream with frustration when their history has been silently taken away and they can't undo the stupid change. It's a risk.
I'm not saying that Adobe made the right design call, but there are positives and negatives on both sides.
Re:GIMP has some issues (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:In a lot of ways, Gimp is more intuitive than P (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:New version of GIMP? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:[Ff]ree vs Piracy (Score:4, Interesting)
The interesting part is that once she showed her friends her edited pictures and animations they also started using it. Many tried pirating PS, but
Now all her friends and half her high-school is using the Gimp simply because the translation makes it easier to use, even if windows and office and everything else on their computers is pirated. My sister jokes she should get a prize from the Gimp team, since she spread it around.
(Note that I do know from experience that PS has a lot of nice features, both at the low and high end, but the translation is worth the difference for a lot of people)
CMYK is irrelevant (Score:5, Interesting)
Only if you're working in pre-press. Photographers, even professionals, don't deal with CMYK. Cameras and film scanners are RGB, all retouching is done in RGB, and final images are delivered to magazines/newspapers/whatever in RGB (usually TIFF, sometimes 16 bits per channel, usually 8). Then the pre-press production work begins by moving the images to CMYK and adjusting the colors so they look good in that colorspace and in the print system's color profile.
This book is for photographers, not pre-press production. For photographers, the real issues that make Photoshop better than the GIMP are:
Only item 2 above is a real showstopper, and that's only for images that benefit from greater dynamic range. Item 3 is huge convenience, but can be worked around. Item 4 is also just a convenience factor, but there are some plugins that do stuff that would take hours to do manually. If you need one of those regularly, you're best off getting Photoshop and the plugin.
Re:New version of GIMP? (Score:3, Interesting)
The book is excellent (Score:2, Interesting)
Try the 2.4 RCs [Re:New version of GIMP?] (Score:4, Interesting)
You should try the release candidates for version 2.4 - the UI has been significantly improved. It's still not "OMG SEXY" or anything, but it's *far* better than the 2.2 series' was.
Re:New version of GIMP? (Score:2, Interesting)
The GIMP is definitely the most powerful image manipulation application in the free-to-$100 range, but it simply isn't as good as Photoshop, especially in the area of intuitive usibility. I pretty much self-taught myself Photoshop, but I've never been able to get the hang of the GIMP. It's difficulty curve isn't quite as bad as running into a brick wall (like when I was trying to learn blender), but it's pretty close if you're trying to do anything beyond the most basic functions.
Re:Paint.net beats GIMP with a stick (Score:4, Interesting)
A few years ago I was forced to switch to Windows because I was looking for work and at the time the office tools just weren't up to par. I needed a job and I needed to be 100% sure that companies could read my resume with no compatibility issues and Word was, unfortunately, the standard.
To make a long story short I eventually started my own business running commercial web sites. I stuck with Windows mostly because of Internet Explorer but for reasons I can't quite remember I got a copy of Photoshop and became very proficient with it and started to like it. I don't remember why I never used The Gimp on Windows but I remember there being some reason.
In April I finally migrated back to Linux. I wanted to try Ubuntu and I was VERY impressed. However...
I just can not use The Gimp.
And this is coming from someone who used to use it all the time with no problems. I missed Photoshop after moving to Ubuntu sooooooo much that I actually set up a dual boot just for Photoshop.
Here's why... (and maybe The Gimp can do some of these and I just haven't looked hard enough, I'll admit I haven't spend a TON of time trying).
o Slices + Save for web + generate HTML. Fuck, slices PERIOD would be nice. And yes Photoshop can make messy HTML and I always clean it up by hand afterwards but as a web developer this is one of my most used Photoshop features.
o "Save for web" in general. Sure I don't *need* it. But especially when I'm trying to create very small GIF images it's nice to be able to play with the settings and see the palette so I can get the smallest file size possible at the largest possible quality. I pay for bandwidth. This is important.
o Being able to crop to specific width and height without having to break it into 2 steps (crop + resize)
o All of the layer effects in Photoshop that I use all the time that don't seem to exist in The Gimp (drop shadows, outer/inner blur, stroke etc.). The only thing I can seem to do in The Gimp is adjust the opacity and set the blend mode. So it seems with Gimp you're forced to use script-fu and filters and they create extra layers etc. It's less convenient, takes more time, is not as extensible / adjustable. Gotta guess what your settings will result with and then it's done. If you don't like it you gotta undo and do it all over again. With layer effects in Photoshop you can make a quick adjustment and instantly see the result without applying or committing anything. You can also disable layer effects in Photoshop individually without completely doing away with them.
o Preview JPEG quality when adjusting the quality before a save ("save for web" does this too).
o Ability to save and load selections.
o Actions / history (I actually had to open The Gimp and look because I wasn't 100% sure about this one
o Channels don't work the same. If I duplicate a channel and view only that duplicated channel it's all black in The Gimp. In Photoshop I get a greyscale image that I can work with. Perhaps I'm just not doing something right in The Gimp.
o This is a common complaint and many people would say "it just takes getting used to, The Gimp shouldn't try and be Photoshop etc." but I can not stand The Gimp's multiple windows. This has nothing to do with being used to Photoshop and not being used to The Gimp etc. It's simply a major pain in
Re:New version of GIMP? (Score:3, Interesting)
To use Gimp for something like this seems to me to be the ultimate in masochism.
Even using Photoshop for most of the pictures seems to be way too much work. Only if you need very special alterations is a drawing program going to be the best tool (like blue eye removal from photographing animals, or actual retouching). Most of the time, you just want to crop and adjust, and perhaps remove a few specks or red-eyes.
And I'm a Unix guy, who hates Windows. But Gimp just isn't the right tool for this.
I'm a pro photo and I like GIMP (Score:4, Interesting)
8bits per channel vs. 12-16 bits per channel isn't really an issue for newspaper work. I've never noticed any fellow photographers use these extra bit depth modes. Everybody seems to stick with 8bit/channel jpegs. RAW is slow and takes up a lot of space on memory cards. Also, bear in mind that newsprint is "axle grease on toilet paper" so any advantage that higher bit depths provide will not be especially noticeable. Heck, just getting the CMYK registration to line up on a press is a big enough challenge!
8bit/channel images are the standard for Web images. So for newspaper Web sites, GIMP, of course, would be perfectly adequate.
For personal work, I use GIMP. All my flickr photos are processed using GIMP. When I make prints at the one-hour lab, I bring in my media card full if images adjusted only with GIMP. For me, price is an issue. I strongly prefer not to spend $600 on Photoshop. But also, and just as important, I am a fan of the Free Software philosophy. It appeals to me. For these same reasons and more, I use GNU/Linux and BSD at home, also.
Regarding GIMPs interface, coming from a Photoshop background, it did seem to be awkward to me at first, but now that I'm familiar with it, GIMP's interface seems fine to me. It all depends on what you're used to.
I've also used GIMP for personal paid projects
As an aside, I recently installed GIMP on a family friend's computer. They love it! Here's an actual email I received from them:
"... I took the copy of the rooster photo you had on my CD to send to Costco to make a large print for my sister. The color was dull, so Drew helped me with GIMP and we got vibrant color and an amazing print. I will send it to my sister framed for Christmas; it will be the perfect gift. Thank you for giving us copies of your terrific photos. I want to learn more about GIMP this year, and this experiment has me excited about the possibilities
Re:CMYK is irrelevant (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:CMYK is irrelevant (Score:3, Interesting)