A Brief History of Slashdot Part 2, Explosions 216
A lot of things happened in parallel in the late winter and spring of 1998. We switched over from Ariel, the Alpha, to Triton (yes this is a Little Mermaid thing- all of my machines were named after Disney cartoon characters for many years until I started naming them after anime chars- my current laptop is Lum), a cobbled together from leftover parts dual Pentium. It had more RAM and a bigger hard drive. (As an aside, We're planning on auctioning off the case for charity- the guts are long gone, but stay tuned for more information) Triton itself actually lasted for a year or more serving initially as the entire Slashdot. It later was shipped to California and continued to serve web traffic even after we added a second machine for database traffic.
During spring break of 1998 I rewrote Slashdot from scratch. I looked into PHP and Perl. I researched MySQL and Postgres. And based on what existed in 1998, I chose what was the best for my needs. And while cool kids drove to Florida and saw boobs, I stayed up all night and rewrote almost all of the site from scratch. The new system used mod_perl, making it possible to NOT recompile the whole site for every single page request. And replacing flat text files with an actual honest to god SQL database made performance screamingly fast (for at least a few days anyway) until traffic increases squished us again.
It wasn't but a few weeks later before we were politely asked to get the hell off our network. The traffic being consumed by Slashdot was essentially saturating our ISPs entire T1 during the afternoon. The folks at the MacNet were good to us, but enough was enough. We packed up the box and mailed it to California. Since then, I have never physically touched a computer that was running Slashdot. Hell, I've never even seen them in person. Originally it was distance that made it impossible to see them, but today the SourceForge netops staff maintains the hardware. Frankly it's for the best- I tend to break things when I touch them. Our provider forbids photography inside the colocation facility, so if anyone asks, I've never even seen what the installation looks like. What a stupid policy that is.
The new code made another huge change which was to have long term repercussions. Originally all Slashdot content came from my travels through the internet, and my inbox. After April of 1998, submissions were sent to us via a web form and maintained using a nifty little web interface I hacked together. At the same time, a few friends were given administrative accounts, and among them was Hemos. Up to that point I had posted every single story that appeared on the site. A by-line was added, and the load was distributed. A number of Slashdot volunteers came along in the following months, and several continued to work with us for years more.
We toyed with a number of ways of making some cash around this time as well. The ad agency I worked at tried to sell ads. We partnered for awhile with a couple of different ad selling networks. Eventually we formalized the creation Blockstackers- a corporate shell for Slashdot and later, Everything2. By the end of the summer, Nate had coded our own Ad Server (known as AdFu) and were selling our own ads. Our ad server was a hack, but having worked with a number of mainstream ad systems over the years, it had serious advantages- not the least of which was very high performance.
When the fall semester started up again, I quit my day job and ran Slashdot as my only job... besides school which for that last 3 months hardly counted.
It was right around this point that we created user accounts. For nearly a year all posts had no authentication... but now you could reserve your name. I got UID #1, and to this day can trump this debate in the frequent (and inane) discussions you see in stories where people brag about their low user IDs. Mainly user accounts were created in response to spam. At this point we started having the occasional DDoS and crapflood of our forums. It was a pain in the ass, and led to a long series of security changes including our now infamous moderation system. At first there were a couple dozen friends who could moderate. I used their moderations to find a few hundred more moderators, a system which worked for several months until the comment volume exceeded their available time.
I finished college in the fall of 1998 and was able to dedicate every minute of my life to Slashdot. The moderation system was expanded to include 'Mod Points' and any eligible Slashdot reader could moderate by simply being a regular, positive contributor to the site. Meta Moderation followed soon on. By this point, Slashdot had pretty much all the core functionality that it has today- it didn't visually change for like 5 years after that when we finally redesigned the site.
In the following months the site was pulling down enough money that all of us were able to quit day jobs and work on Blockstackers related projects. During this time we never had a month in the red- we never had debt. We always broke even. Of course, when you live and work in a burnt out dump in a very small town, that's not that hard to do! At this point it was Me running Slashdot, Dave doing Sysadmin work, Kurt in charge of HR/Bizdev etc, Jeff in charge of sales/marketing and Nate working on E2. We hired CowboyNeal around that time as well. Everyone helped everyone else: I'd write HTML for Nate or he'd hack some odd code for me. Looking back it was probably the most creatively satisfying period in Slashdot's history. Ideas could be implemented quickly. Cash was tight, but we could always afford beer. Life was good.
First post had become a huge problem- since it took several minutes for comments to appear, there would often be 5-10 of them. So I wrote a task that would post a random templated first postish looking thing to every story before anyone else could see it. After a real post appeared, it would delete itself. It was called fpsBeDamned. It ran for several months until a few people noticed them disappearing, and accused me of deleting comments. As the FAQ says- we really don't delete comments except for the incredibly rare DMCA or Secret Service mandated events. So important was the rights of the bot, that I eventually disabled it. It was a fun experiment tho, and I really started learning about the sorts of things people will do to screw with a public system, and what I would need to stop it. I also became increasingly aware that I was going to need a lot of help and hardware to deal with it.
Which takes us to mid 99... it was time to go corporate. Which we'll talk about next week.
Heh (Score:5, Funny)
Funny, that's not what I called it back in the day.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Please reply with your credit card number(s) to cover shipping and handling.
Yeah, (Score:5, Funny)
I haven't been able to see anything remotely like pr0n, since Taco's bogofilter began to screen out the Penis Bird.
Re:Yeah, (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yeah, (Score:5, Funny)
Here he is on the move: (.Y.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, it doesn't mean that at all. I just felt really really left out.
Yes, quite. Umm. Uhhh.
In Soviet Russia, saddle yaks you!
3. PROFIT!
Pictures? (Score:3, Insightful)
ISTR that we did indeed see posted pictures of the box once it was shipped to California. And yes, that is a stupid policy.
Not news (Score:5, Funny)
Way to keep up with the latest in technology, Taco.
I'm sure it will be duped in a few more years again.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You must be new here.
^_^ or maybe I'm the one who's new and enjoyed reading it.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
GOATSE.CX
Grits
GNAA (hated this crap)
Portman / nudity / petrification
Penis Bird
MEEPT!
Your ideas intrigue me sir, and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter
Troll Talk (Yeah! Hidden Topics!)
In Soviet America...
All your base...
I for one, welcome...
Re:Not news (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
OGG was some of the funniest trolls I ever read... I kinda miss those caveman posts
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The cleverest ones where the BSD is dying / Firefox is dying posts. First time I saw them I rattled off huge angry rants at them, only to realize it was a GNAA style troll. Good times.
A friend also showed me a setting called "Failurevision" , where you basically tweak the mod settings so all the -1 posts become +1 posts and vice versa, and your left with JUST the trolls and terrible posters.
Nice List, but... (Score:2, Insightful)
*ducking*
Re: (Score:2)
Links, please? (Score:5, Informative)
Don't worry (Score:5, Funny)
alexa (Score:2)
http://alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=slashdot.org [alexa.com]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Slashdot also appears to be more busy during the weekdays that the weekends, which gives a strange sawtooth pattern. Still, slashdot is still in the top 1000 sites, ranking 686.
Sigh (Score:5, Funny)
PS... STFU about Ebay, douches.
Re:Sigh (Score:5, Insightful)
PS... STFU about Ebay, douches.
2nd post problem (Score:5, Funny)
That is awesome, now how do you kill the 2nd post problem?
Kidding aside, congratulations on 10 years of
Re: (Score:2)
DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Interesting)
You can't just dangle that out there. Please tell us more. We, the readers, love intrigue.
Re:DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
-ed
Re:DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Informative)
Re:DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Funny)
Ok then,
Would "Fork off to hell and die!" be better?
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure what the secret service one was (and we'll probably never find out).
Re: (Score:2)
Re:DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:DMCA and Secret Service (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
How did you know about my bumper sticker?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The old story submission page (Score:5, Interesting)
What used to be a cool way of keeping a blog and fostering a relatively active community around a few "hub" users (FK, etc.) has become a spam tool of attention whore users who skim crap stories from all the usual news sources and post them as journal entries in the hopes of getting published on the front page. Seriously, there is a user who just posts reviews of new cell hardware. The move of journals from a community-building feature to attention whore feeder has completely broken the original use of journals.
In another vein, why are you guys still banning people for being very active? I'm alluding to the problem of bots which you fixed by auto-banning any user who hits the site more than a certain number of times within a few hours. For anyone actively engaged in a thread, refreshing the page to get the latest comments is essential, so getting a large number of hits all at once from a single IP may not necessarily be the result of bots. With all your work on the code, I find it hard to believe that you can't figure out a heuristic to separate legitimate users from spiders and bots.
Other than that, I can't believe I've spent this much time on this site. I expect Bill Shatner to tell me to get a life and move out of my parents' basement.
Re: Bad Analogies (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why not apply Karma rules to Firehose submissions? (Score:3, Interesting)
The important things in life (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Wait, isn't that the point?
Re:The important things in life (Score:4, Funny)
I want to hear about you trying to move to Mac... (Score:4, Funny)
Screenshots (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
(BTW, so am I)
Re:Screenshots (Score:5, Informative)
Re: What was I thinking (was Screenshots) (Score:2)
LOL. Looking at some of those old news stories (and the hot technology of the day) is almost as bad as looking at your high school yearbook. That said, it might be interesting to have someone to go through them and catalog some choice opinions, predictions, etc. held at a given point in time.
Then again, maybe we're still bitching about the same old stuff.
Re:Screenshots (IBM's 25GB drive) (Score:2, Interesting)
IBM announces a 25 gigger
Hardware Posted by Hemos on Wednesday November 11, @10:11AM
from the why-i-could-put-3/4-my-cd-collection dept.
Booker writes "So IBM announces a 25 gig hard drive... does the world need this yet? Unless this is in a RAID, would you really want to trust 25 gigs on a single drive? What would you use this for? 400+ hours of MP3s comes to mind... "
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Screenshots via wayback machine (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://slashdot.org [archive.org]
Re:Screenshots (Score:4, Funny)
UIDs (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Easy for those of you with a low UID to say.
Lucky bastard...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Bah! What an arbitrary criteria.
Clearly, what matters is whether your UID is PRIME!
Re:UIDs (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cachedot? (Score:5, Interesting)
An Idea (probably not new)... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Just post it on the web.
Re:Are you fucking crazy? (Score:4, Funny)
Slashdot has Ads? (Score:5, Funny)
Well, would you look at that...
Slashdotted?! (Score:2, Interesting)
That seems like revenge!
When did Zonk join? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
CSS Layouts! (Score:2)
Lum-chan! (Score:2)
Let me guess, it electrocutes you every time you try and look at pr0n?
"Daaaaahhling!!! No baka!" ZAAAAAAAPPP!
Something unmentioned (Score:5, Interesting)
ever tempted by the dot-com boom? (Score:5, Interesting)
And he gave into it, too. (Score:2)
Taco, Hemos, et. al. did well out of it however.
First post (Score:5, Funny)
Pictures (Score:2, Informative)
The webservers look almost exactly like the rack on the left in this picture: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/unix/farm/orlov.jpg [stanford.edu] minus the fiber. The rack they're in looks almost exactly like this: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/img/83/i07/8307cover_Rackable.JPG [acs.org]
The database server looks just like the top machine in this picture: http://galle [bioteam.net]
user ids? (Score:2)
what kind of a loser would start a thread about that?
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously not someone with an ID as high as yours, newbie.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously not someone with an ID as high as yours, newbie.
Re: (Score:2)
So yes, people will start a thread about that kind of nonsense.
The first Slashdotting (Score:2)
The first server to get Slashdotted was...the Slashdot server. How tasty
Jon Katz (Score:2, Insightful)
Now, what about when Jon Katz was the most hated contributor on
http://www.segfault.org (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:They do delete posts (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Taco is the Secret Service.
Re:They do delete posts (Score:5, Funny)
Mods, be gentle, this is my (honest!) first ever attempt at a "In Soviet Russia... joke
Re:They do delete posts (Score:5, Funny)
Nyet! Stalin had more compassion than we do!
--The Mods
Re:More pathetic narcissistic navel-gazing (Score:5, Insightful)
Once after doing some moderating, I left my browsing level at -1 by accident. For a few days until I realised, I thought Slashdot had been overtaken by some sort of dedicated spam operation, but no, that's just the usual amount of crap you see browsing at that level.
I still can't believe people constantly post the same racist/trolling insults to pretty much every article submitted, but I guess it gives you a good idea of what kind of people there are in this world.
And then there are people like the AC im replying to, who probably have an account but daren't speak with their ID for fear of repercussion.
It just goes to show that moderating does work
Re:relocate (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Damn thing's gettin' kinda burnt-lookin', too...
Re: (Score:2)
I did finally retire it recently though. It's just too little computing per-watt, and faster hardware pays for itself in electricity savings.
I just wish I had done something as lucrative with mine as Rob did with his. I bet we bought them from the same online auction. I made a site that served up surface images of mars p
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Sorry, I just had to take that shot...
I have a DEC Alpha LX164 533Mhz which I only stopped using as my firewall because it was using too much power. Cool box though.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I think there's something weird going on with the AJAX/JavaScript execution.
Re: (Score:2)