Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media Encryption Security Your Rights Online

Claim of a Blu-ray BD+ Crack 307

Google85 writes in with a brief Enquirer piece reporting on an announcement on a German site that SlySoft claims to have cracked BD+, the extra copy-protection layer in Blu-ray. Here is the German original.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Claim of a Blu-ray BD+ Crack

Comments Filter:
  • doom9 (Score:5, Informative)

    by legoman666 ( 1098377 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @04:57PM (#21176449)
    Some more info about it at http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=130527&page=5 [doom9.org] Knew it was only a matter of time...
  • by maillemaker ( 924053 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @05:00PM (#21176501)
    I don't have an HD-capable TV, so I don't fool around with Blu-ray or any of that stuff yet.

    But I wanted to take this opportunity to say how great Slysoft's software is.

    I tried at least half a dozen pieces of "free" software trying to rip DVDs and re-encode them to .AVI files. While I could usually get the ripping done (Ripit4me worked), I could never get a re-encoding to work that didn't have audio/video sync issues.

    I plied all the forums, downloaded endless codecs and other whosit and whatsit pieces here and there and could never get it to work. So much for "open source".

    So I laid out $80 to Slysoft. One package to rip the DVDs, and one package to re-encode them into a variety of formats (I use .AVI). It has worked flawlessly.

    I'm a big Slysoft fan now.
  • translation (Score:4, Informative)

    by bvdbos ( 724595 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @05:04PM (#21176541)
  • by moosesocks ( 264553 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @05:36PM (#21176913) Homepage
    Although their Windows version has a ways to go, HandBrake [m0k.org] is fantastic for ripping/encoding DVDs in one fell swoop. 99% of the time, 'it just works'.

    The more recent versions have made it a bit less "mac-like" (ie. they added a whole lot more configuration options), but it's still dead-on simple to use.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @05:55PM (#21177143)
    SlySoft: AnyDVD to circumvent new AACS-Protection, soon also BD+

    Fourth version of AACS has been cracked.

    The Producers of the copying-tool "AnyDVD", Slysoft, released a new Version of their software. It can now cope with the new version of AACS and is expected to also copy Blu-ray-discs protected by the supposedly uncrackable "BD+".

    Ever since April 2007, the Copy-protection-committee AACS LA revoked keys for movies and drives after they had been compromised. The cat-and-mouse game was supposed to end with the version "MBKv4" - the fourth version - which changed the keys. Slysoft now told us that version 6.1.9.3 of AnyDVD can also decrypt MBKv4-DVDs. The company claims to have successfully tested it with the HD-DVD "The Transformers", the top-selling HD-movie in the US, and also with the Blu-ray-versions of the Spiderman trilogy.

    Apart from the usual sneering in the press release ("one might almost feel sorry for the poor movie industry guys") SlySoft chief executive Giancarlo Bettini also used the company's success in cracking the copy-protection to call out against it: "I wonder how long it will take for people to understand that increasing restrictions, pressure and protection measures that stop things from functioning don't mean more, but instead less revenue."

    According to Bettini, even the "BD"-protection of Blu-ray players, which uses a virtual machine in the player, has already been cracked. The software is already running and there is little work left to create the according tool. Bettini expects the tool to still be published in 2007. However, according to German law it is illegal to use software that circumvents copy-protection measures.
  • Re:Just cracked? (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @06:33PM (#21177541)
    BD+ is just cracked. Regular BD has been cracked for a while. BD+ was an extra security measure added to BluRay "just in case" regular BD was cracked. If BD+ is properly cracked, it's game over for BluRay, just like it is already game over for HD DVD.
  • Re:Problems (Score:3, Informative)

    by jabuzz ( 182671 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @06:52PM (#21177721) Homepage
    You must my joking. Here in the UK I can get dual layer media for 82p each in a cake box of 25. I know my brother uses them to knock of Disney DVD's so that when my niece has scratched it to pieces he can just bang out another copy from the original. A lot cheaper than a new Disney DVD at upwards of 15GBP each.
  • by Jherek Carnelian ( 831679 ) on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @07:08PM (#21177883)

    Without the BD ROM Mark the disk can't be decrypted quite yet.
    The article makes no claim that this has been cracked.
    No, it just means that without the BD ROM-Mark (and the magic equipment needed to write it to another BD-ROM disc), a bit-for-bit copy can't be made. However, a remastered copy should present no problem at all.

    In other words, the BD ROM-Mark is not intended to stop access to the encrypted movie, it is intended to stop someone from duplicating the original disc without decrypting it all.
  • by ZachPruckowski ( 918562 ) <zachary.pruckowski@gmail.com> on Tuesday October 30, 2007 @11:48PM (#21179709)
    Fox can't sue the MPAA because the MPAA is an organization made up of the studios. The organization Fox would sue for this would be the AACS-LA, and they could maybe sue them for failing to meet contractual obligations or something. But even that would be a stretch.
  • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Wednesday October 31, 2007 @01:31AM (#21180187) Homepage Journal

    About the same number that I have seen smoking weed (or offering to sell me weed). It seems the law isn't making much of a difference. It will happen no matter the legal status. The only difference is a few bad decisions with weed can easily send them in the wrong direction due to the so called justice system. The same bad decisions with alcohol are more likely to get someone killed (still not honestly that likely) but less likely to screw the survivors up for life. Again, this has nothing to do with the effects of the drug, but is based on the screwy way society treats their use.

    Were weed legal for adults and a misdemenor for minors (even if a felony for adults to sell to minors), it would probably cause less problems than alcohol.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...