Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Books Media Book Reviews

The Happiest Days of Our Lives 149

If you've ever read Wil Wheaton's blog (clevernickname to us), you know he's not afraid to put everything on the table. One of the things I've always admired about his writing is his willingness to talk about his kids. On the internet. With ... people. Despite the obvious problems that could cause, Wil has been sharing anecdotes about his adventures in parenting since the early days of WWDN. His newest book, The Happiest Days of Our Lives, talks about growing up geek and what it means to be a nerd and a father at the same time. Read on for my review.
The Happiest Days of Our Lives
author Wil Wheaton
pages 136
publisher Monolith Press
rating 8/10
reviewer Zonk
ISBN 0974116017
summary Wil Wheaton's recollections of growing up, and parenting, as a nerd.


That the bones of the book's content comes directly from Wil's website shouldn't distract you. Whether you've been a reader all along (and might recognize some of these stories) or not, they've all been expanded and clarified for inclusion in the book. That clarification is something that comes across very strongly in Happiest Days, especially if you have read any of his previous work. Wil has put a great deal of work into the craft of writing over the past few years, and it shows. Some three years have passed since his sophomore effort in Just a Geek, and even more since Dancing Barefoot.

Where once it seemed as though Wil had something to prove in his writing - that he was over showbiz, that he was over Star Trek - Happiest Days is full of simple stories. The day he bought a Lando Calrissian action figure essentially by mistake, a simple outing for ice cream with his sons; they're everyday events but artfully told. In total he has about thirteen short tales in the chapbook-sized novel, ranging from just two pages long to a few dozen.

Some of his most evocative stories (and the reason this review is here) are all about Wil's growth as a nerdling. The most evocative for me was the chapter 'a portrait of the artist as a young geek', which details Wil's introduction to tabletop roleplaying. From his first brush with the infamous 'red box' D&D set at Christmas 1983, to his experience teaching his kids how to roll up characters under the 3.0 rulesset, the story reminds me (and may remind you) of a D6-laden past.

And really, that's what Wil makes this a book about. It's about his own past, his troubles, his triumphs, but in reality this is meant to be a book that reaches out to you as a reader. If you see something of yourself in the kid who agonized in the toy aisle, if you see something of yourself in the dad who argues with his kids over the radio station (and rocks out to 80s synth-pop), then the purpose of the Happiest Days has been fulfilled. Or at least, as I see it.

And, of course, if you like Wil's discussion of Star Trek there's some elements of that there as well. The difference, again, is that instead of pining for Trek itself, Wil reminisces about the impact Trek has had upon him. Great experiences talking like adults with Jonathan Frakes, the chance to speak to Ron Moore backstage at a con, and the recording of a documentary are what makes for stories from Wil in the here and now.

Probably the book's strongest element is also its biggest drawback. Wil's vicious editing and strong prose makes for an incredibly short book. The amount of story and emotion packed into the bare 136 pages is impressive. But ... it's still just 136 pages. And for $20, that seems a bit steep. For me, though, it was worth it to support an author that's been a pleasure to watch grow over the last several years. From blogger to published writer, Wil Wheaton's journey is laid out in miniature in the pages of Happiest Days. With the sour taste of Just a Geek washed out of his mouth, my hope is that we'll see more long-form work from Wheaton in the future. In the meantime this is a worthy 'sequel' to Dancing Barefoot, and well worth a look by fans of the well-placed word.

You can purchase The Happiest Days of Our Lives from Monolith Press. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Happiest Days of Our Lives

Comments Filter:
  • Really very good (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MrAndrews ( 456547 ) * <mcmNO@SPAM1889.ca> on Tuesday November 20, 2007 @04:36PM (#21425961) Homepage
    This is definitely one of my favourite books of the year, if for no other reason than the simple familiarity of the writing. Reading it is like sitting in a pub with an especially expressive friend, listening to him tell you some crazy story about his past that you suspect must be embellished, but don't mind if it is. After a crazy day dealing with puffed-up psychopaths a few weeks ago, I read four chapters, and it's like the casual tone just evaporated all my tension. Wil sucks the pretension out of the air with his writing... it's just superb.

    The one thing I'm hoping for is a work of fiction next... I know it's an extra-daunting task, but I'm sure it'd kick ass.
  • Re:Really very good (Score:4, Interesting)

    by MrAndrews ( 456547 ) * <mcmNO@SPAM1889.ca> on Tuesday November 20, 2007 @05:36PM (#21427001) Homepage
    On the off chance you're still hanging around here (rather than, say, fighting with PayPal), I had a question for you: now that you've done fiction and non-fiction, which do you find more difficult to wrap your mind around? You seem to be very much at ease with writing about your real life, but I wonder if that's just a general skill that you're applying in a specific way.

    For me, I can't write about my life without collapsing into a puddle of trembling self-doubt, but I can make stuff up about invented people without breaking a sweat. I wonder if your talent in that area stems from being an actor, and being more comfortable "putting yourself out there".

    Very much looking forward to your short story! Good luck with the 300!
  • Re:Really very good (Score:5, Interesting)

    by CleverNickName ( 129189 ) * <wil@wil[ ]aton.net ['whe' in gap]> on Tuesday November 20, 2007 @05:53PM (#21427279) Homepage Journal
    For me, I can't write about my life without collapsing into a puddle of trembling self-doubt, but I can make stuff up about invented people without breaking a sweat. I wonder if your talent in that area stems from being an actor, and being more comfortable "putting yourself out there".

    It's the exact opposite for me, or at least it has been to this point. When I write narrative non-fiction, I know the whole story arc and all the characters, because I've experienced it all firsthand already. All I do is try my best to recreate as vividly and simply as possible what's already happened. To be honest, though, I'm starting to get bored telling stories about my own life, and if I'm getting bored with it, the audience can't be far behind (if they haven't gotten there ahead of me.) So now it's time to focus on writing fiction, which is sort of like moving from the outfield to third base for me.

    Until recently, when I've sat down to write fiction, I've gotten tremendous performance anxiety about creating something almost entirely out of whole cloth. I've felt like, "Hey, look at me! I. Am. A. Writer. I. Am. Writing. Now." (That works if you say each word out loud and make exaggerated typing motions with your hands, and use a dumb guy voice.) I'm still not entirely over that self-consciousness, but it's getting easier with each attempt. I think the key for me (at least right now -- I'm still at that point where it's easy to level up quickly) is coming up with a beginning and an ending, and using a couple of characters I care about to tie them together. The real trick is not being afraid to suck, because it's easier to fix something that sucks than it is to fill a blank page.
  • A Great Geek Read (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Fricka ( 583769 ) on Tuesday November 20, 2007 @06:53PM (#21428089) Homepage Journal
    I got my copy in the mail a few weeks ago, right before I left on a trip. When I got back I picked it up and then didn't put it down until I was done. It's a real thrill ride of a "whodunit". Ok, it's not but it IS very compelling reading.

    I enjoyed it immensely. Perhaps this was partly because I grew up in the town neighboring his so those stories had extra meaning to me. However, I think any geek will enjoy it, as someone else said in the comments, he's "one of us".

    My formal review is on my blog: http://www.offlinetshirts.com/blog/index.php/2007/11/20/book-review-happiest-days-of-our-lives/ [offlinetshirts.com]

    As a disclaimer, I must admit to having met Wil in person and to getting my copy for free (which was a very cool surprise).
  • by unlametheweak ( 1102159 ) on Tuesday November 20, 2007 @11:30PM (#21430813)

    "Writing about" is not the same as "gossip". What makes you think it is?
    The medium is besides the point. It is all verbal communication. The outcome is the same. "Gossip" does not necessarily imply malicious intent, however it can invade people's privacy.

    I write about my kids. Anything I write is a fair and accurate description that does not try to portray them in a poor light.
    It's certainly good that you do not try to portray your kids in a bad light; however a writer's intentions may not always reflect the opinions of their children. For example, a person may not think that talking about a child's bowel movements may not be malicious, but that child may not think that is "fair" or appropriate. Talking about a child's romantic crushes or their love of some unpopular musical style may also not be in the child's best interests, however "fair" the author may think he / she is trying to be. These are just a couple of an infinite amount of examples I could use.

    If they dislike it now or later, that's their problem, not mine.
    I agree that it is their problem, and they will have to deal with it. That's also a rather callous way of thinking about your children. If you don't care about the feelings of your children then you shouldn't be a parent IMHO.

    I will state that if a person (whether it be you or Wil Wheaton) writes about their kids, then they should discuss this with their children first and get their permission. Otherwise it is just gossip, whether it be written or oral in nature. If one wants to talk about their kids while at the same time protecting their anonymity, then this would be acceptable to me.

    People should have etiquette and show respect for their children. In respects to the original poster:

    What's so problematic about discussing your children on the internet? Everyone with kids does it.
    I stand by what I have said all along, and I have answered the question (whether people agree or disagree with the answer). I hope I have elaborated appropriately on the premise that "Because the kids may not like that, either now or in the future." I certainly hope you do think about your children's feelings when you talk or write about them, and keep an open (and open-minded) dialogue with them.

  • D6? Oh please. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Azari ( 665035 ) on Wednesday November 21, 2007 @08:18AM (#21433527)

    the story reminds me (and may remind you) of a D6-laden past

    D6?? I associate D6 with Monopoly and Steve Jackson & Ian Livingstone Fighting Fantasy [wikipedia.org] books, not D&D. I think I still have my d20 (if I can still call it that without getting permission from Hasbro ;P) from my first edition of D&D.

    ...+1 Pedantic nerd?

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...