Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government News Your Rights Online

Judge Backs Amazon, Raps Feds Over Book Records 113

netbuzz alerts us to a ruling in federal court that has just been made public. US Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker told the Feds to lay off Amazon in denying prosecutors' requests for records of who bought what books at the online retailer. The judge wrote, "The [subpoena's] chilling effect on expressive e-commerce would frost keyboards across America." Prosecutors had demanded 24,000 transaction records from Amazon, all in service of convicting a city official on charges of fraud and tax evasion. In the end they found customer information on the official's PC, where they should have looked in the first place.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Judge Backs Amazon, Raps Feds Over Book Records

Comments Filter:
  • precedence (Score:4, Interesting)

    by theMerovingian ( 722983 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2007 @05:41PM (#21497649) Journal

    This sounds factually similar to the Robert Bork video rental disclosure issue. See here. [epic.org]

  • Woops (Score:2, Interesting)

    by goingforaslash ( 1195043 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2007 @05:42PM (#21497651)
    Another case of the powers at be sitting in a room full of mirrors and muttering "Woops".
  • New /. groupthink (Score:2, Interesting)

    by BooRolla ( 824295 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2007 @07:14PM (#21498691)
    Seriously. We all should be liking Amazon about now (at least for a little bit). They stood up to the Feds even when they really didn't have to beyond the inconvenience.

    We can get back to hating them for the single click patent after Christ^H^H^H^H the holidays.

    (Interesting note: captcha was 'dogma')
  • by Attila Dimedici ( 1036002 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2007 @07:54PM (#21499131)

    It generally doesn't happen overnight, or all at once. A certain paperhanger and his minions didn't transform Germany in one fell swoop -- it was done gradually, eroding the rights and privacies of the people little by little, step by step, always under the guise of it being for their own good or protection from bad guys. I'm not necessarily making a direct comparison here.....I'm just saying....
    Actually, it was pretty close to overnight. The Weimar Republic was never very well supported by the German people. Hitler was appointed Chancellor on January 30, 1933, and his government suspended civil rights on February 28, 1933. The Nazi's got 37% of the vote in November 1932 and those who didn't know what Hitler intended weren't paying attention. The only reason Hindenburg agreed to appoint Hitler Chancellor was because he thought that Hitler could be controlled.

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...