DOJ Doesn't Like the Idea of A Copyright Czar 215
sconeu writes "Seems as if the DOJ is not particularly happy about HR 4729, the 'Copyright Czar' bill. The Deputy AG told Congress that the current structure works quite effectively. 'Panel members also expressed concern over Section 104 of the bill, which would allow a copyright owner to collect statutory damages for each copyrighted work that is stolen. Detractors fear that this provision could result in protracted lawsuits ... Section 104, however, would penalize criminals on a per-song basis, so if someone pirated a motion picture soundtrack that had songs from 12 different artists, the pirate would be charged with 12 separate offenses and be subject to exorbitant fees.'"
Re:firt post (Score:1, Funny)
With the way this country is going... (Score:4, Funny)
Thanks (Score:2, Funny)
?????
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHHA
BAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Oh my god it hurts...
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Translation... (Score:4, Funny)
Who's Word is Copyright Czar? (Score:5, Funny)
Who chose the wording "Copyright Czar"? That's akin to asking members of Congress to vote on killing puppies. No, they won't kill the puppies and they won't support a "Czar" of any kind.
Captain Copyright, on the other hand, wearing a cape, a smile, and a costume that says "Don't steal MY music" would go over much better.
Re:With the way this country is going... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Pointless (Score:2, Funny)
Wouldn't it be cool if... (Score:2, Funny)