Wal-Mart Closes Online Movie Download Service 136
eldavojohn writes "A year after opening its movie download service, Wal-Mart has abandoned the endeavor. They claim this is a result of HP's decision to stop supporting its video download store software. The article also notes that, unlike iTunes, Wal-Mart offered variable pricing which attracted a lot of studios. 'The world's largest retailer instead turned its rental service over to Netflix Inc. Wal-Mart still operates a music download service and continues to sell CDs and DVDs at retail stores and over the Internet for shipping by mail.' Is this evidence of the strength of unified pricing in media downloads or just another company being squished by the giant Netflix & Apple?"
Cost and lack of extras the reason. (Score:5, Insightful)
Squished? (Score:5, Insightful)
That's like saying the local burger joint is going to crush McDonalds! Sure, Netflix is a big company, but they're nothing compared to the Wally-world behemoth.
Re:Wal-Mart "squished"? (Score:3, Insightful)
I was gonna say.
You mean for once WalMart isn't the one doing the squishing? How'd that happen?
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
It's Walmart (Score:4, Insightful)
HP Dropping support sounds like a cop out... but a believable one
Re:Squished? (Score:5, Insightful)
Sometimes a big company will try some new endeavor to much fanfare, but not bother to try very hard, assuming somehow that they will win because they are big. When that happens it's easy to take them out. Wal-Mart had no plan here; they just thought selling some videos at terms dictated by the studios might get them some cash. If they ran their retail stores that way, those would fail too, but they put serious effort into their retail stores.
Outside the Core Competency (Score:4, Insightful)
While hindsight is 20/20... this is a classic example of an "Old media" company failing to adapt to the "New Media" because they didn't have any expertise in the current technology.
Wal-Mart's core competency is managing their supply chain. They make money by being the most efficient supplier of products that are in local demand. They operate their integrated technological systems marvelously. They don't know jack-shit about the internet and "download-able content". They should partner with Amazon to run their webpage... though that would probably start to enter into an anti-trust area.
Too many restrictions... (Score:2, Insightful)
All of Wal-Mart's eggs were in HP's basket (Score:4, Insightful)
No contract with HP? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Wal-mart does what it does (Score:4, Insightful)
I read somewhere that 75% of all KMarts and Sears competed with a Wal-Mart, but only 33% of Wal-Marts competed with a Sears because of this strategy. When you can beat your competitors on price, location, and convenience, you're going to do well no matter what.
Re:Wal-Mart "squished"? (Score:3, Insightful)
Here in Austin, which is admittedly not a huge metropolis but is a good sized city, there are already several Wal-Mart stores, and I guarantee none of them are hurting for customers. However, there is a neighborhood association in north Austin that has been trying to block a Wal-Mart from being built near them for close to two years now. What's odd about that effort is that the area Wal-Mart wants to build in is currently occupied by a dilapidated mall that is mostly empty and rarely sees much traffic. They claim that having a Wal-Mart there would drive down property values (although I have seen plenty of very upscale neighborhoods located right next to Wal-Marts) more than having a mostly empty run-down mall does now. Personally, I think if another discount store that wasn't called Wal-Mart wanted to build there, no one would have any issue with it.
Personally, I rarely shop at Wal-Mart mostly because it's always too crowded and the marginal savings on decent stuff (the really cheap stuff is almost universally garbage) isn't worth the hassle. However, I doubt Wal-Mart spends a lot of time worrying about how to make their stores less crowded for my benefit.
Re:Cost and lack of extras the reason. (Score:3, Insightful)
Compound that with the fact that there is probably a Walmart (or some other large dicount retailer) within 5 miles of your home in most major areas.
If I can get in my car, drive to the actual Walmart, buy the superior product for the same or often less than the one online, and be back at home in under 20 minutes
- Roach
Re:Businesses are NOT swiss army knives (Score:3, Insightful)
Unfortunately, the only thing that they can leverage from their retail success is their name recognition. Those things that make me love Wal-Mart evaporate in the digital world: their lenient return policies, multiple locations and low prices are all nullified by the fact that it's not a physical medium.
DRM is what kills it for me. (Score:4, Insightful)
letting the studios set the variable pricing.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Many studios have resisted signing deals with iTunes in part because of Apple's desire to sell movies at one price. Studios prefer variable pricing such as Wal-Mart offered.
what's to note here is that films were offered between $13 and $20 a pop, with older titles at $7.50. When will it occur to studios, in regards to how variable pricing won't work, that if there is no demand for an "older title," then there will be no purchases, even if you sold them at a buck a pop.
the ones that are in demand, that people want to buy, are being sold at or above the price of a regular dvd! sounds more like the studios are trying to make a download service fail.
Re:Wal-Mart "squished"? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Unified pricing is short sighted. (Score:3, Insightful)
iTunes, however, offers most of the tracks I want and with no waiting. Usually I can't get them any cheaper from Amazon. Plus there are a lot of times i don't want the whole album. I want 1 or 2 tracks. For $2 I can download and have it right there. For another $.50 (for the CD) I can burn to a CD-R and play it in my car.
iTunes was the first with an easy to use interface, pricing that made sense, and a flexible enough DRM that balances out what the studios wanted and fair use.
That's not quite the case with the video downloads. I bought season 3 of Battlestar Galactica last year because we didn't get SciFi at the time through the condo's cable plan. I backed them up to data DVD's when I switched to a new machine (and for archival purposes), but I can't go over to iDVD (or even DVD Studio Pro) and burn a playable DVD
Personally I like unified pricing. One of the reasons why I use Dish network is that they'll play hardball with the content providers over price. If CBS suddenly wants 30% more to air 7 channels that I probably don't watch anyway, Dish yanks the networks until the CBS folks come down on their price. I'd like to see Al la carte pricing since I could get by with about 20 cable channels that I actually watch.