RIAA Now Filing Suits Against Consumers Who Rip CDs 403
mrneutron2003 writes "With this past week's announcement by Warner to release its entire catalog to Amazon in MP3 format with no Digital Rights Management, you would think that the organization that represents them, The RIAA, would begin changing its tune. Instead, they are pressing on in their campaign against consumers by suing individuals who merely rip CDs they've purchased legally. 'The industry's lawyer in the case, Ira Schwartz, argues in a brief filed earlier this month that the MP3 files Howell made on his computer from legally bought CDs are "unauthorized copies" of copyrighted recordings.'"
RIAA Layers have completely lost it (Score:4, Informative)
The Howell case was not the first time the industry has argued that making a personal copy from a legally purchased CD is illegal. At the Thomas trial in Minnesota, Sony BMG's chief of litigation, Jennifer Pariser, testified that "when an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." Copying a song you bought is "a nice way of saying 'steals just one copy,' " she said.
This is so ridiculous that it would be funny, but I fear they are completely serious about it...
Re:Old cassettes? (Score:3, Informative)
Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How was he caught? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:How was he caught? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Old cassettes? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Good luck with that one. (Score:2, Informative)
I believe it actually _is_ illegal to copy a CD for personal use in the UK.
Fortunately it's a law that generally gets disregarded by pretty much everybody.
Good Christ, not this again (Score:2, Informative)
Welcome to the end of 2007 (Score:2, Informative)
"The Supreme Court ruled today that police questioning in the absence of Miranda warnings, even questioning that is overbearing to the point of coercion, does not violate the constitutional protection against compelled self-incrimination, as long as no incriminating statements are introduced at the suspect's trial.
But a person subjected to such questioning can still bring a civil suit against the police for damages for violating the Constitution's guarantee of due process, the court ruled." source [nytimes.com]
So, not only do you have the right to remain silent, you actually have the right to sue the police if they coerce you into giving up that right -- and they still can't introduce what you say as evidence.
from the RIAA website (Score:3, Informative)
Doesn't this directly contradict what this lawsuit is about?
Re:from the RIAA website (Score:3, Informative)
"Doesn't this directly contradict what this lawsuit is about?"
Actually, no. As I understand it, the RIAA is going after him (via a settlement offer... no lawsuit yet) because they believe he is sharing music via P2P.
The key phrase is "unauthorized copies" and how its meaning can change independently of the act of ripping it. Here's how the RIAA sees it:
It may seem like a meaningless distinction, but lawyers are like that.
Basically, the RIAA is being a stickler about personal use. Rip all you want, but if you go beyond those bounds, it's "unauthorized." Going beyond the bounds include putting those rips into your P2P share directory (as the RIAA is claiming this fellow did). I believe that if you give away or sell the CD once you've ripped it, the RIAA will likely claim it as unauthorized, as well.
Gordon Brown (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1582428.ece [timesonline.co.uk]
But then later removed it when he was informed it was illegal.
(In Britain there is no concept of "Fair Use" in copyright law)
Re:One word (Score:4, Informative)
But, if you purchase a CD, any one with the official Phillips CD logo on it, then you are guaranteed to have no copy protection on it. Phillips has been quite good about requiring that any disc with that logo on it be played on any CD player that has ever been made, which effectively prevents DRM systems from being put on to a licensed disc.
Phillips in on record as saying that placing their CD logo onto any disc which doesn't conform to their standards represents trademark infringement. And realistically, that is the way that it should be, kind of a reminder that IP can also be beneficial to consumers as well.
On a side note, with every single story along these lines, and the RIAA press release that goes along with, I am more and more glad that I don't do business with them. If they want my money to fund their crusade, they're going to have to do so responsibly and in conformance with the laws of the US. All of them, including the ones that indicate that you can't bring known fraudulent cases to court.
Re:Go directly to jail (Score:4, Informative)
I think something completely different is what is usually mentioned. I think the big change is simply driven by going from a market dictated market to a consumer dictated market. In other words, we don't want it your way, we want it our way. At whatever pricepoint we think is reasonable (probably somewhere around $0.10 per song) and in whatever format we want.
As long as that doesn't happen piracy is here to stay, and when it does happen you have to hope that the piracy infrastructure is not so well entrenched that people will not even bother to switch to legal stuff anymore. The longer the wait the larger the chance that the music industry will not survive.
If a significantly large portion of the population commits a crime (say going 20 km above the speed limit) it technically still is a crime but the actual enforcement is no longer feasible. That only works when the percentage of criminals to honest citizens is small enough to warrant enforcement. Past that point the judicial system simply breaks down.
Re:Gordon Brown (Score:3, Informative)
And in return we get the bbc, which provides not only some of the worlds best TV, but provides radio that is listened to worldwide, and one of the best websites on the Internet. Oh, yes, and it has one of the largest, if not the largest collections of free audio and video content in existence.
Want a few months worth of interesting material, try this site:
In Our Time (completely fascinating discussions on just about every topic you can imagine)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/inourtime/ [bbc.co.uk]
Like Astronomy? Try this one for many, many hours of video content:
The Sky At night tv show (worlds longest running tv show in fact)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/spaceguide/skyatnight/proginfo.shtml [bbc.co.uk]
Like all sorts of Science? Try here, for more content then I can list..
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/ [bbc.co.uk]
And that's without even going near the bbc iPlayer service..
Re:One word (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Gordon Brown (Score:3, Informative)
For one reason, I'm glad that we don't get adverts every few minutes.
In the USA even free to air tv (apart from PBS) carries ads. You pay for the that in the products you buy.
Personally, I listen to the Radio far more than watch TV. BBC radio is like the TV. No Ad breaks and after all would a commercial broadcaster have made programs like
- Monty Pyhon
- Hitchhikers Guide
- The Office
- Little Britain
- The Goon Show
etc etc etc
Re:Still pleasantly surprised by human nature (Score:3, Informative)
RIAA has a big image of Muhammad in all their offices and regularly mock the good name of Islam. Just thought you'd like to know.
~
Re:That's not funny -- it's sad (Score:5, Informative)
"In Atlantic v. Howell, the RIAA claims that "[once] Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recording into the compressed
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=953494 [avsforum.com]
Odd how both the summary and the Washington Post article skip that particular fact.
Re:Good Christ, not this again (Score:3, Informative)
* Boing Boing [boingboing.net] p2pnet [p2pnet.net] reddit [reddit.com] Heise Online [heise.de] (German) Truemors [truemors.com] BlogRunner/Digital Rights [blogrunner.com] Hugh Casey [livejournal.com] IDG [www.idg.pl] (Polish) Geek News Central [geeknewscentral.com] CE Pro [cepro.com] Gizmodo [gizmodo.com] TechDirt [techdirt.com] Read/Write Web [readwriteweb.com] Thomas Hawk's Digital Connection [thomashawk.com] TDPRI [tdpri.com] WhatReallyHappened.com [whatreallyhappened.com] Slyck [slyck.com] Root.cz [www.root.cz] (Czech) Craigslist Forums [craigslist.org] Hard OCP [hardforum.com] Wired.com [wired.com] Uneasy Silence [uneasysilence.com] Overclock.net [overclock.net] Wake World [wakeworld.com] SpaceBattles.com [spacebattles.com] Hydrogen Audio [hydrogenaudio.org] BrickFilms.com [brickfilms.com] Hockey Zombie [hockeyzombie.com] iLounge [ilounge.com] Zune Scene [zunescene.mobi] AllmanBrothersBand.com [allmanbrothersband.com] Golem [golem.de] (German) PC Magazin [pc-magazin.de] (German) Tweakers [tweakers.net] (Dutch) Mackauf [mackauf.de] (German) Wake Space [wakeworld.com] Kino-eye.com [kino-eye.com] Digital Copyright Canada [digital-copyright.ca] Northwest Progressive Institute [nwprogressive.org] Louisville Music News [louisvillemusicnews.net] Frant [franticindustries.com]