Copyright Cutback Proposed As RIAA Solution 709
An anonymous reader writes "InfoWeek blogger Alex Wolfe proposes a novel solution to the ongoing spate of RIAA lawsuits over alleged music copying. He suggests legislation which cuts back corporate copyrights from 120 years to 5 years. 'We should do what we do to children who misbehave,' he writes. 'Take away their privileges.' Wolfe says this is regardless of the misunderstanding surrounding the latest case, which apparently isn't about ripping CDs to one's own computer. As to those who say copyrights are a right: "That's simply a misunderstanding of their purpose. Copyrights, like patents, weren't implemented to protect their owners in perpetuity. They are part of a dance which attempts to balance off societal benefits against incentives for writers and inventors. You want to incentivize people to push the state of the creative and technical arts, but you don't want give those folks such overbearing protections that future advances by other innovators are stifled." What do you think; is it time to cut off the record industry?"
Re:Preaching to the choir (Score:4, Funny)
I think you meant to type "Sonny Bono" but, then again, maybe you really weren't that far from being right.
Re:Preaching to the choir (Score:5, Funny)
"I come in peace. Take me to your Lizard." (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Preaching to the choir (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Flaming to get hits. (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Before you all go crazy .... (Score:3, Funny)
Take it another step. (Score:3, Funny)
A step further it you can't buy it anywhere because its no longer in print same thing, end of copyright. I have long felt that same rule should apply to books and computer software. If I can't buy it at any price because you longer make it available, then someone else should be able too.