Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Government Social Networks The Internet Politics

Social Sites Offer 'New' Way To Experience Presidential Debates 106

News.com notes that the social sites have been burning up in the wake of the debates, as users create more content than it's possible to follow. Facebook specifically set up an area for debate viewers to post messages and take surveys during the events. Some participants found it a bit worthless, and the article refers to the experience as 'information overload'. "No doubt, the political twitterers must've felt empowered to know their Soundboard comments were being beamed out to an audience of potentially millions of Facebook users, and, if plucked by ABC's designated Facebook-monitoring reporter on TV, millions of offline viewers as well. Still, it's a little unclear whether the comments will prove all that useful for campaigns looking to boost their candidates' standing."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Social Sites Offer 'New' Way To Experience Presidential Debates

Comments Filter:
  • Re:here today but... (Score:5, Informative)

    by 0100010001010011 ( 652467 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @08:07PM (#21936600)
    There seems to be a big misconception about how Facebook works that I keep seeing repeated by slashdotters that don't have it.

    If you go to type in someones name that has *default settings*, if you're not in their network all it shows you is their face and name and what network they are on. (A network was originally a 'college', but has since been expanded to "Work" and "Regional"). From there the privacy settings are very very customizable.

    I can make it so NO ONE can find me in search. More or less invisible and I have to add friends. I can make it so only 1 network (Say my college network) can see my drunken bar photos while only my Work network can see me helping old ladies across the street. I can put people on a limited profile so that crazy stalker girl I can add as a friend and not have her see my phone number. But just because someone can find you on search doesn't mean they get ANY of your personal information and even then you can limit it.

    It's really very flexible.

    I don't see why everyone is up in arms about facebook 'privacy' concerns . So Facebook knows my name and movies. I don't care. I'd rather have them try and push a new ad to a movie I'd like than a chick flick. And until I start putting in either financial information and SSN, I really don't care if they store the passwords in plain text.

    I'm guessing you also don't pay much attention to maxi-pad or home pregnancy test ads. There's a reason the word "Demographics" exists. Everyone on slashdot (and I'm not saying you) seems to think that because THEY do or don't do something that EVERYONE must think the way they do. If you don't like social networks fine. There are plenty of us who do. Just like there are plenty of us who prefer Debian over Ubuntu and OS X over XP.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @08:40PM (#21936912)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday January 06, 2008 @10:33PM (#21937656)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...