Toshiba Making Funeral Plans for HD DVD 452
Blue Light Special writes "With HD DVD on life support, Toshiba is reportedly preparing to bow to the inevitable and allow HD DVD to expire quietly. 'While denying that a decision on the fate of HD DVD has been made, a Toshiba marketing exec left the door wide open. "Given the market developments in the past month, Toshiba will continue to study the market impact and the value proposition for consumers, particularly in light of our recent price reductions on all HD DVD players," Jodi Sally, VP of marketing for Toshiba America Consumer Products, said.'" A few folks have also noted that Wal-mart is joining the Blu-ray train, further lowering the stock of HD DVD.
HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! (Score:2, Insightful)
Ew... (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh well, I'm not all that interested until the players (and the televisions) drop to a reasonable price. Oh, and easy-to-do piracy is another must on my list! ;)
Re:HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! (Score:2, Insightful)
Am I the only one? (Score:5, Insightful)
At least Blu-Ray rolls off the tounge easier. And yes, I'm convinced that's at least part of the reason it won.
Re:So Much For The Zonk Anti-Sony/BluRay FUD Barra (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:At least it's over... (Score:1, Insightful)
Are you for real?
Sony marketing 'pulled this off'?
This is the long fought victory of BDA - BluRay Disc Association. A very large and wide ranging group of hardware companies all backing the BluRay standard:
http://www.blu-ray.com/info/ [blu-ray.com]
HD-DVD never had any plausible chance of viability in the market. It would have died much sooner if Microsoft hadn't stepped in and used it in a failed attempt to sabotage HD movie formats in order to try to lead consumers towards their own unsuccessful movie download service.
Re:HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Looks like Sony's gamble paid off. (Score:4, Insightful)
Sony wins, everyone loses (Score:2, Insightful)
In this war I didn't WANT there to be a winner. I was hoping both camps would be forced to accomodate to an ongoing market share tug-of-war, while consumers owned hybrid players and weren't locked into EITHER format, and could choose whichever suited them. Movie studios would release movies on whichever they wanted, or could do double-sided discs (HDDVD on one side, Blu-Ray on the other) and release them in both formats, like music albums were released on cassette as well as CD for many years.
Now that Sony owns the HD movie format, it's a strong disincentive for me to start buying movies in HD, until the DVD format is phased out completely, or until it becomes possible and easy to rip movies from Blu-Ray and reauthor them minus the DRM.
Re:HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:betamax, minidisc, 8-track (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Looks like Sony's gamble paid off. (Score:1, Insightful)
Just as well HD-DVD DRM was cracked (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:HD DVD joins Betamax in tech hell! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
DVD became a runaway success because (a) it was cheap, and (b) it gave noticable picture-quality improvements and other advantages that could be enjoyed with existing setups.
Blu-Ray is not only relatively expensive, but it requires an HD set to make it worthwhile. Even those with HD sets could stick with upscaling DVD players. (*) And I suspect there are a significant proportion of people who rushed out and bought HD because it was the latest thing and they could boast about it to their friends, and haven't noticed that the picture from their $30 DVD player connected via the composite cable actually sucks
(*) In fact, it's a theory of mine that with improvements in dynamic image-processing technology (more than just upscaling), the picture quality from existing DVDs could be *far* improved. What I have in mind would require some fairly powerful chips doing intelligent analysis over multiple frames, and the cost would probably be horrendous at present- but I could see that changing. Then again, by the time that happens, Blu-Ray or some other HD rival will probably be established anyway. (OTOH, the same techniques could possibly be applied to HD sources to make them better *still*, so it might be worth pursuing anyway).
Re:Congrats to those who bought into that crap :) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Am I the only one? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:5, Insightful)
If you buy more discs, you're investing in a dead-end system, and when your original machine breaks down, you'll likely have to buy a secondhand player in a few years time if you want to keep watching your collection. Which might not have the benefits of newly-built (and Blu-Ray only) hi-def players- and what if you want to use them in your computer(s)?
And if you end up wanting to watch Blu Ray stuff, you'll end up forking out for that anyway, have two players cluttering up the place and (as above) effectively just be using the HD-DVD player for watching a few discs.
I'm not saying that you're necessarily wrong though- *if* they sold HD-DVD discs off cheaply enough, this may not matter if you get your money's worth of enjoyment from the system anyway. Particularly if you hadn't planned on buying Blu-Ray at present.
Oh, and remember that the "worth" of a movie is the minimum of either (a) the most you'd be willing to pay for it and (b) the lowest price you can get it for without too many drawbacks. So perhaps it's "worth" $30 based on the RRP, but what's its real worth? Then again, $30 doesn't sound too bad to me, so forget this last paragraph
Poor advertising (Score:3, Insightful)
While Blu-ray has ads that put the format up front and show you multiple movies you can get for the format, HD DVD ads are mostly ads for a single movie, available on DVD and HD DVD. The only ad you could say was an ad for the HD DVD format itself focused far too much on characters of Shrek, and the characters were actually complaining about the superior quality of the picture, either for Donkey's dragon girlfriend looking too big and scaly or Gingie finding himself looking too delicious and taking bites out of himself, ([crunch] "Ow. Yummy!"). Rather than promoting the format, it felt like it was promoting the Shrek franchise.
I find it interesting too that though Apple backs Blu-ray, DVD Studio Pro supports HD DVD instead. Apple's DVD Player software included with Leopard only plays HD DVDs mastered by DVD Studio Pro, but still is the first OS to ship with native support for an HD media format, and it was HD DVD. Still, the mastering time is ridiculous: 1 week to encode 22 minutes of 1920x1080i video to H.264 on a 4-core Mac Pro with Compressor running 24/7.
Re:That's a Shame (Score:2, Insightful)
Hell, I'm not buying one until they get sub-$50. Hopefully by then the spec will be stabilized and the DRM will be more easily cracked and ignored (like DVD). If I can't burn a backup on my computer and play it in my official Blu-ray player (at FULL QUALITY), then I ain't interested.
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Myself? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think so. I think you haven't kept up with the latest information over the last year or so.
Blu-tay has a larger capacity, but the 1st several releases suffered from bad transfers and use of old MP2 compression.
Yes, but that was years ago.
Since Blu-ray seems to be prevailing I hope that this is old news and no longer the case.
It is indeed no longer the case, and hasn't been for some time. The Blu-ray discs are now generally regarded as higher quality than HD DVD.
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:5, Insightful)
Or just buy a PS3 and don't worry about it.
I have a 60GB PS3 and there's not a BD or a special feature out there that it won't play. Nor will there ever be.
Re:Sony wins, everyone loses (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't throw it away... Recycle it... (Score:5, Insightful)
Then let's see who wins in the long run. Toshiba can still ship HD-DVD recorders, media, etc. Being fully open, the platform will reach every corner that Blu-Ray doesn't, by design. Blu-Ray is a very consumer-hostile format as-is; it's designed to limit the medium. Toshiba should give up not by burying it, but by becoming the antithesis of its competitor.
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Blu-Ray != Sony (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:That's a Shame (Score:3, Insightful)
If you had the same movie, one on a DVD with a decent up converter, and the other on blu-ray shown on the same TV with the same settings side by side, I guarantee most people would pick the blu-ray one as looking better.
The same test with audio just doesn't work. Most people can't tell the difference between MP3 and CD much less CD and SACD. About the only advantage SACD and DVD-A had are surround sound. The problem with that is that it requires decisions to be made when the music is recorded. Most bands just aren't going to up and start recording in surround sound. Plus you can't just easily convert old music into surround sound. Plus the majority of people listen to music in their cars or on headphones. Surround sound doesn't help much there.
Blu-Ray isn't going to be expensive much longer. I'm pretty sure it's price is dropping at least as fast as DVD did. Now that the format war is over, the cheap Chinese products will come out and push the cost even lower. You will probably see players in the $100-$150 range by Christmas. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if you find it very hard to buy a DVD player that does not also play blu-ray 2 years from now.
Re:Re-brand to "High Density"...? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It's Over, But Blu-Ray Isn't Ready (Score:2, Insightful)
Why are you not outraged that it takes half a minute just to open the drawer?!? What the hell is wrong with these things taking more than a second to open the tray, and less than 5 to start playing the feature? I just don't get it.
Re:At least it's over... (Score:2, Insightful)