Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States Power Science

Government Report Examines Alternative Energy Research 50

coondoggie points us to a NetworkWorld story about the Government Accountability Office's report on the state of advanced energy technology. The report notes that despite continued funding [PDF], U.S. reliance on oil has only dropped from 93% to 85% since 1973. It goes on to evaluate how the most prominent fields of research have developed in that time period, and where they are likely to go in the future.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Government Report Examines Alternative Energy Research

Comments Filter:
  • Fossil fuels != oil (Score:5, Informative)

    by sodul ( 833177 ) on Friday March 07, 2008 @08:04AM (#22673872) Homepage

    Come on the US energy consumption is not 85% oil it is not even half of that. Note that the article correctly state fossil fuel, the summary translated to 'oil' incorrectly. I guess 'oil' makes a better headline.

    Wikipedia numbers for 2005 [wikipedia.org]:

    in 2005, it was estimated that 40% of the nation's energy came from petroleum, 23% from coal, and 23% from natural gas. The remaining 14% was supplied by nuclear power, hydroelectric dams, and miscellaneous renewable energy sources.

  • by BadAnalogyGuy ( 945258 ) <BadAnalogyGuy@gmail.com> on Friday March 07, 2008 @08:24AM (#22673946)
    However, if you look at the graph [wikipedia.org] showing the growth of energy production, you'll notice that non-renewable fossil fuel-based production is growing at a more rapid rate than the other sources put together. The only other source that could be considered growing is nuclear, and it's outpaced by fossil fuel production by quite a bit.

    While there are certainly positive geo-political ramifications of reducing our reliance on oil, there is also a significant benefit in reducing fossil fuel usage on the whole. The environmental damage done due to fossil fuel extraction and combustion can be decreased. Likewise, since fossil fuels are a non-renewable resource (in our lifetimes, at least), we cannot continue to see that line grow forever. We must be focused on becoming more reliant on renewable energy sources.

    Like any monopoly, having one source of energy as our primary source means that we lose flexibility if and when we are forced to consider other options. It is better to take the hit early (like Iceland) and reap the benefits down the road than to wait until the last minute and energy prices have climbed to astronomical levels.
  • don't tell anyone (Score:3, Informative)

    by sgt scrub ( 869860 ) <[saintium] [at] [yahoo.com]> on Friday March 07, 2008 @10:45AM (#22675040)
    For better or worse the GAO said the DOE's recent R&D focus in renewable energy has been in biomass-derived ethanol; hydrogen-powered fuel cells; wind technologies; and solar technologies.

    But Willie Nelson had the biggest effect by making biodiesel popular http://www.biowillieusa.com/ [biowillieusa.com]
  • by MozeeToby ( 1163751 ) on Friday March 07, 2008 @11:14AM (#22675402)
    The document can be copied if it is copied as a whole, but you cannot copy individual pictures/graphs out of it. They have the owner's permission for the first, but not for the second.
  • by WindBourne ( 631190 ) on Friday March 07, 2008 @11:46AM (#22675800) Journal
    The only request for money, that I can see, is if you want printed copies. That is it. In addition, you are FREE to copy the ENTIRE document, just not portions. They are trying to prevent this from being used in incorrectly.

    I am fine with what they have.

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...