Nuked Coral Reef Bounces Back 332
sm62704 writes "I found this New Scientist article interesting, as I was actually alive (albeit very small) when Bikini Atoll was H-bombed. The article says that the reason the reefs are now flourishing is because they are mostly undisturbed by humans, who are afraid of the radiation. Background levels there are now 'similar to that at any Australian city,' while nearby islands haven't been so lucky.'When I put the Geiger counter near a coconut, which accumulates radioactive material from the soil, it went berserk,' says Maria Beger of the University of Queensland in Australia."
Better article and detail (Score:5, Informative)
The full story is that although some of the corals have bounced back remarkably, the nuking has also resulted in the localised extinction of some more sensitive sensitive species
Re:Well, yes and no (Score:3, Informative)
Turkey? The only nuclear weapons on Turkish soil are the ones stored at the USAF base at Inçirlik.
Bikini (Score:1, Informative)
The term "bikini" had no other meaning back then. The suit you are referring to was so named because of the bomb-testing — a stroke of a marketing genious. I must admit, it is quite rare to find a slashdot-poster less informed than a musician:
by Gang of Four [musicsonglyrics.com].Re:Radiation induced changes to coconuts (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Bikini (Score:2, Informative)
Re:berserk? (Score:2, Informative)
Yet another strange place to put a link (Score:2, Informative)
In this:
I found this New Scientist article interesting, as I was actually alive (albeit very small) when Bikini Atoll was H-bombed. The article says that the reason the reefs are now flourishing is..
Why is 'Bikini Atoll was H-bombed' linked, which would mean that clicking on it would lead to information about the bombing?
Why isn't 'this New Scientist article' or even 'The article says' the linked words?
In slashdot entries with a number of links, I can rarely tell what to click on, because of inane references like this.
Re:Bikini (Score:0, Informative)
http://www.swimsuit-style.com/bikini.html
Re:You joke, but ... (Score:4, Informative)
You can irrigate, but you also need rainfall once in a while (or you need really cheap energy and good desalination and demineralization such that you're not just watering plants, but spraying the soil slowly and without saturating the soil). If you constantly flood using irrigation, you cause salts to rise to the surface and ruin the soil.
The Soviet Union destroyed entire nations through bad irrigation policy, turning semi-arid soil into desert. You can find it in Wikipedia under man made disasters.
Re:Bikini (Score:3, Informative)
It was in my high school US history book.
Re:That may happen (Score:5, Informative)
This. One of the fun things back in HS was to take the radiation detector to various common items. Heck, Brazil Nuts, Lima Beans, and Bananas are radioactive. So aren't carrots and potatoes. Potassium, an essential nutrient is radioactive.
An extra dose of radiation doesn't mean that somebody is going to die from cancer. It all depends on the dose.
rather than lengthening the life expectancy of a few unlucky individuals by a matter of days on average.
Unless the individual is making said radioactive coconuts a staple of their diet; I'd say minutes is more likely.
Re:Radiation induced changes to coconuts (Score:5, Informative)
Well, to be fair, I'll mention that one study involving birds found that the chicks of birds nesting in the sarcophagus had double the expected deformity rate over birds nesting outside of Chernobyl.
Given that a number of the bird species are the ones where the chicks gradually push out the others such that only one survives out of a laying of 2-6 eggs, the effect of the extra deformities was essentially noise, statistically insignificant to the species.
Re:Oblig: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Radiation induced changes to coconuts (Score:3, Informative)
Whilst humans can't go anywhere near it, or the town of Pripyat, many species of plant and animals have flourished in the 30-odd years since the infamous meltdown. These species display no visible deformations, and continue to breed and live undisturbed by humans.
While I think that the recovery of Chernobyl is astounding and certainly flies in the face of what everyone expected, I don't know if the bounceback after a global nuclear war would be quite so quick.
Of course, the thing that people tend to overlook is that the planet is capable of surviving quite a bit of trauma. We may not survive, but the planet will do fine. That's the thing that so many environmental skeptics fail to grasp, the human race will break before the planet does.
Re:vacation (Score:4, Informative)
Some 43,443 people were killed on the highways in 2005 [usatoday.com].
Meanwhile, 559,312 people who died from cancer. [avert.org] Cancer is only the second biggest killer, heart disease kills more people of ALL races. More black people die of cancer than all races combined die of AIDS.
HIV is comparitively a very minor threat, even to minorities, compared to other dangers. If you're talking about dangers to minorities you should be talking about incarceration, as a disproportionate number of our prisoners (more per capita than any other country) are minorities.