Court Finds Part of Copyright Act Unconstitutional 240
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "A US District Court in the Southern District of California has found the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act to be unconstitutional. That act is what removes the sovereign immunity for infringement that state workers have in their official capacity, something many argued would jeopardize universities with liability for faculty infringement, not to mention other state agencies. In a rather dense legal ruling (PDF), the Court found that the Clarification Act was not a valid exercise of congressional power under the 14th Amendment. For those of you who have absolutely no idea what I just said, I recommend either being glad that a small piece of copyright law may soon bite the dust, or hoping that NYCL will explain this better."
How should I know.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How should I know.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:woohoo! (Score:3, Funny)
Now, could somebody PLEASE mod parent funny? For me?
Re:Constitutional Law 101 (Score:5, Funny)
Ray's busy - cut him some slack (Score:2, Funny)
Re:This subject is VASTLY more complex than you kn (Score:2, Funny)
This would have gone over better if it were a car analogy...
Here, let me try: "Think of this in car terms: In the engine computer program's original base class (constitution) ..."
Re:Not a good thing? (Score:1, Funny)
A used car salesman, sure, but not from the world's most powerful military.
How do you think they got to be the world's most powerful military force? By playing fair?
Re:Dog Bites Man! (Score:3, Funny)
Congress exempts itself from a lot of laws - link [house.gov]. Although the house.gov site puts a positive spin on this (news at 11), they're exempt from minimum wage, OSHA, the Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA), and a lot of other ones.
Funny, isn't it? Congress is exempt from nearly all provisions of the "Ethics in Government Act of 1978."