Carl Icahn Takes on Yahoo's Board 279
narramissic and several others have written to point out that Carl Icahn has initiated a proxy battle with Yahoo's board of directors over their rejection of Microsoft's bid for the company in February. Icahn has purchased millions of Yahoo shares over the past week and assembled a group of nine other investors (including Mark Cuban) to persuade the board to resume talks with Microsoft. Yahoo remains unimpressed. Icahn's letter to Yahoo accuses:
"It is unconscionable that you have not allowed your shareholders to choose to accept an offer that represented a 72% premium over Yahoo's closing price of $19.18 on the day before the initial Microsoft offer. I and many of your shareholders strongly believe that a combination between Yahoo and Microsoft would form a dynamic company and more importantly would be a force strong enough to compete with Google on the Internet."
Re:Addendum: (Score:2, Interesting)
Who cares if the resulting Conglom-O tanks? It's all about the Benji's when you're talking that kind of scratch.
(Personal aside: It's sad when us poor saps see past the influx of cash and rationally evaluate the culture of both the companies and the market and realize that such a proposition would be a hands down mess, while the big bucks players wash their eyeballs of the whole situation).
I don't get it. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Addendum: (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Competition in the search engine market (Score:3, Interesting)
What offer? (Score:4, Interesting)
From TFA: "I and many of your shareholders strongly believe that a combination between Yahoo and Microsoft would form a dynamic company"
Microsoft, on the other hand, says it is no longer interested http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/may08/05-03letter.mspx [microsoft.com]
Re:I don't get it. (Score:1, Interesting)
When I see something like this.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Even if regulated accounting doesn't float your boat, the ideas of Fischer Black (eg. http://www.amazon.com/Fischer-Black-Revolutionary-Idea-Finance/dp/0471457329/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1210920867&sr=11-1 [amazon.com]
) can't be ignored. Under that light, the entire deal seems to be more involved in noise trading than any solid economic expansion.
Re:What offer? (Score:2, Interesting)
Icahn is right! (Score:3, Interesting)
Whatever you think of microsoft as a company doesnt matter.
The yahoo board is supposed to represent its shareholders, if I hold stock in a company and someone offers 72% more than the shares are worth, and the company wont even let me consider the offer id be pissed too!
Icahn doesnt have a duty to yahoo, yahoo has a duty to its shareholder to act in their best interests
even if it means selling out to microsoft and losing their cushy jobs.
Sometimes not everything is black and white.
Illogical conclusion (Score:5, Interesting)
Microsoft + Yahoo = "Dynamic" ?
I think he's way off base. If Microsoft is going to be a Dynamic Duo with anyone, it would be more likely some organization that thinks like them and can compliment their business practices, such as:
Microsoft + Halliburton
Microsoft + SCO (oops, already happened)
Microsoft + Phillip Morris
Microsoft + the Mafia
Microsoft + Dow Chemical
Microsoft + Exxon Mobile
To his credit, the dude's got balls! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Icahn is right! (Score:3, Interesting)
This would have been a better deal for Yahoo than Microsoft. Yahoo shareholders would have gotten an "out" from that struggling company, but Microsoft would have been stuck with yet another Internet property that can't compete with Google's advertising business.
If I were a Yahoo shareholder, I would be pissed at the board rejecting Microsoft's offer. If I were a MS shareholder, I would be pissed at Balmer for going off on this wild goose chase.
Re:In other news.... (Score:4, Interesting)
He recently tried to do the same thing to Motorola (disclaimer- I'm a current shareholder of MOT, and despise him) before the shareholder vote kept him out of the board- he still sued the company to force Motorola to sell its mobile business so he can cash out quickly.
Interestingly, he owns a hefty stake of Take Two. He may try the same shit if EA comes back with a bigger offer.
He has no other vision than seeing dollar signs as quick as possible (at any cost) and doesn't care any about the long-term health of the companies he plunders. Thousands have lost their jobs and even more small-time retail investors have been trampled on by him.
He's the worst kind of trader. In fact, I welcome short hedges more than seeing him scoop up shares of companies that I have positions in.