Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Media Technology

Sony CTO Starts New "Buy Once, Play Anywhere" Group 138

jriding writes to mention that a new effort, headed by Sony Pictures' CTO, will attempt to allow customers to stream video content seamlessly on any device that they own. One has to wonder how successful or "all encompassing" it will be without Apple, TiVo, and Amazon, some of the major players in the space. "It's all very much in the future, however. The press release is peppered with confidence-wilting phrases such as "will define and build a new media framework" (something this complex hasn't even been defined yet?), "we are developing," and "over time." Without even a spec in place, there's no way we will see working products for at least a year, quite possibly longer. And, if the strategy document we discussed in August remains accurate, new DECE-ready devices will be needed to make the whole scheme work. By the time video stores adopt the tech, electronics firms implement it, movie studios support it, and consumers purchase all the pieces to make it work, will it still matter?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sony CTO Starts New "Buy Once, Play Anywhere" Group

Comments Filter:
  • by elrous0 ( 869638 ) * on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:20PM (#25016161)

    Sony are notorious control freaks and DRM stalwarts. Need I remind anyone of the Rootkit CD fiasco [wikipedia.org], or the fact that they sold their Blu-ray format largely on the basis of its not one, but *two*, different "uncrackable" DRM layers [wikipedia.org]?

    Is there anyone in the world who believes for a SECOND that their "Buy Once, Play Anywhere" will translate to anything other than "Buy Once, Play Anywhere, as long as you let us put our intrusive DRM schemes on your devices and let your devices phone home to get our approval first"?

    Anytime you have a hardware manufacturer who is also a media content producer, you're going to get heavy-handed DRM on their devices and media content, all under their strict control. Sony is no more going to let you make copies of their movies willie-nillie than they're going to let you have access to the GPU on the PS3 for your homebrew.

  • I dunno . . . (Score:5, Insightful)

    by catbertscousin ( 770186 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:22PM (#25016191)
    I kinda like my membership in the "Download Once, Play Anywhere" Group.
  • Open formats (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Lord Lode ( 1290856 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:28PM (#25016269)
    To play anywhere we want at any time, we need open or widely implemented video and audio formats supported by any hardware and which can be carried on any kind of memory (optical drivers, flash memory, ...) and that can be transfered from one device to another using standard connection protocols like USB mass storage device, FTP, ... No lock-in crap, closed formats, or "DRM that allows playing on any device in your domain" or other such silly short lived things. So if what I described isn't what Sony plans, it sucks.
  • Re:I dunno . . . (Score:3, Insightful)

    by hansamurai ( 907719 ) <hansamurai@gmail.com> on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:28PM (#25016279) Homepage Journal

    More insightful than funny. Why do we need DECE-ready devices to support this when plenty of no copyright-bit-detecting devices already exist?

  • It already exists. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by JustinOpinion ( 1246824 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:34PM (#25016375)

    According to Singer, video should become a buy once, play anywhere technology like CDs and DVDs. ... will define and build a new media framework

    Ummm.... doesn't this already exist? I mean, if you want to release video in a format that will play anywhere, on any device... this is trivial. Just release it using a well-established video codec. Every laptop and OS and browser and media center and video iPod and mobile phone can then play the file.

    Of course this would be by far the most consumer-friendly approach, and would satisfy the requirement of "play anywhere technology." But of course the subtext to the article, which isn't explicitly stated, is that they want a "play anywhere" format... but with DRM.

    This is basically an oxymoron, though. Like a "drive anywhere" car, that is incidentally specifically designed to shut-off if you drive outside of a pre-approved range. Or a "cook anything" microwave oven that reads the barcodes off your instant-meals, and incidentally won't turn on if unrecognized things (like home-made food) are put inside.

    This whole venture is doomed to fail. It will fail because for a truly "play anywhere" ecosystem, the DRM spec would have to be open and not costly (in which case, homebrewers and hackers alike will circumvent it within minutes). It will fail because big companies (like Apple) have no reason to help this idea. It will fail because the implementation will be complicated and error prone. It will fail because consumers will still notice the DRM, and have to overcome it frequently (thereby defeating the purpose).

    You can't achieve "play anywhere" with DRM.

  • Typo (Score:3, Insightful)

    by commodoresloat ( 172735 ) * on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:34PM (#25016387)

    It's actually called "Buy Once, Pay Anywhere" ... they want to make sure that you have to pay for your content no matter where you watch it.

  • Time saver (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Dan East ( 318230 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:35PM (#25016393) Journal

    I'll save them millions of dollars and thousands of hours of meetings and development time: Xvid / MP3

  • Dead in the water (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Have Blue ( 616 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:37PM (#25016433) Homepage
    Won't support the iPod. Won't go anywhere.
  • by Edgewize ( 262271 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @04:42PM (#25016495)

    I seem to recall another DRM solution with fairly broad manufacturer support, that promised to work "for sure".

    How many times will the industry bring out new, better, "consumer-friendly" DRM? At what point do they realize that you can't dress up restrictions and pass them off as features?

    People might not always be educated on topics like DRM or copyright but that doesn't mean that people are suckers. Attention music industry: don't piss on our heads and tell us it's raining.

  • by Firehed ( 942385 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @05:03PM (#25016757) Homepage

    If you subscribe to their notion that you're purchasing a license to listen rather than a copy of the music, then yes, they should absolutely replace broken/damaged/lost media. I think there's a saying involving cake about their approach...

  • by Brain Damaged Bogan ( 1006835 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @08:04PM (#25019049)
    just download the bittorent then re-encode it for whatever device you want to play it on. easy.
  • by Chazman ( 6089 ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @08:56PM (#25019629) Homepage

    Let's take a quick walk back through the vault of previous Sony-invented media formats, shall we?

    Betamax.
    Mini-Disc.
    Memory Stick.
    ATRAX.

    You'll pardon me if I ask why I should believe this will turn into anything other than another colossal flop.

  • by SenseiLeNoir ( 699164 ) on Tuesday September 16, 2008 @07:20AM (#25023307)

    [Sarcasm on]
    And not to forget the "Colossal Flop" of the Sony invented 3.5inch Floppy disk!
    [Sarcasm off]

    Sony has invented some great stuff, as well as some duds. MiniDisc, and BetaMax were technically superior at the time, but the marketing lot screwed both.

    MiniDisc was in fact a REALLY good idea at the time, a portable recordable medium that was at least durable, at a time when Solid State was not really there.

THEGODDESSOFTHENETHASTWISTINGFINGERSANDHERVOICEISLIKEAJAVELININTHENIGHTDUDE

Working...