Scientists Claim Breakthrough On Holographic Display 123
SpuriousLogic writes to tell us that University of Arizona researchers claim to have broken a barrier in holographic technology by creating an updatable, three-dimensional display with memory. While the existing model is only able to update once every couple of minutes, and isn't particularly suited for 3d images, it is certainly a step in the right direction. "Peyghambarian is also optimistic that the technology could reach the market within five to ten years. He said progress towards a final product should be made much more quickly now that a rewriting method had been found. However, it is fair to say not everyone is as positive about this prospect as Peyghambarian. Lecturer in Electronic Engineering at Bangor University in Wales, Dr Justin Lawrence, told CNN small steps were always being made on technology like 3D holograms, but, he couldn't see it being ready for the market in the next ten years."
Another revolutionary technology... (Score:5, Insightful)
Who? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who is this Dr. Justin Lawrence and why is he being cited as the authoritative naysayer for this technology? He doesn't seem to have any reasons to be unimpressed other than this cliche:
AGAIN!? (Score:5, Insightful)
seriously, how often have we read about holo-TV breakthroughs within the last - say - 15 years?
I stopped believing, although I'd love such technology...
Re:Another revolutionary technology... (Score:2, Insightful)
Interesting, but what about filming? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Misunderstandings and Disbeliefs (Score:3, Insightful)
You mean those crappy monochrome pictures you see in art galleries that you need to be looking at 100% square on to get anything other than horrible distortions?
Look, I think holograms are cool and all, just like I did back in the '80s when they were the next big thing. And they don't seem to have improved much since.
Re:Interesting, but what about filming? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Cool now for the real use (Score:3, Insightful)
What about porn games? (Score:3, Insightful)
Porn is usually the deciding factor between two competing technologies
Counterexample: video game consoles vs. PCs running Windows. The consoles have no pornographic games, yet PC gaming hasn't slaughtered console gaming. Why is this?
Re:Another revolutionary technology... (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't understand people claiming that porn created the computing universe in 6 kilobytes.
Computers proliferated when they became cheap enough for the average person to afford (IBM PC) and useful enough for the average person to want (taxes, word processing, games, etc). Sure, some people probably bought Internet service primarily to access porn, but I don't think that had much effect on the overall computer boom. Computers boomed like cars boomed: someone made it cheap and people saw everyday uses for them.
Now, one might make an argument about porn boosting search engines (look at graphs of popular terms over time), but certainly not the whole shebang.
Re:Another revolutionary technology... (Score:2, Insightful)