Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Sci-Fi Media Movies Entertainment

First Official Photos From New Star Trek Movie 410

Philias Fog writes "The most secret project in Hollywood is finally lifting its skirt. Today Paramount released a number of images for their new Star Trek movie directed by JJ Abrams. Shots include images of the bridge of the Enterprise, the villain Nero, a ship (not the Enterprise) and all of the crew in uniform. TrekMovie.com has a complete set of photos and links to all the new shots."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Official Photos From New Star Trek Movie

Comments Filter:
  • by morgan_greywolf ( 835522 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @08:54AM (#25398299) Homepage Journal

    Bah.

    There are rules. Well, mostly. The rules for rec.arts.startrek.* from way back when seem to apply just as well today: if you saw it on the screen, large or small, it's 'canon' -- officially part of the Trek Universe.

    Any discrepancies in on-screen material are just blown off as a YATIs -- Yet Another Trek Inconsistency. It's not like a movie and television project that has spanned almost 40 years, 5 television series, about a dozen movies and has had literally hundreds of writers can possibly keep everything consistent. Get over it.

  • Re:no comment (Score:3, Informative)

    by rugatero ( 1292060 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:20AM (#25398575)
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but in this film they aren't yet the command staff, are they? My understanding is that this film is set back when the future Enterprise crew are still in the Academy.
  • Re:I hate Hollywood. (Score:3, Informative)

    by 91degrees ( 207121 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:22AM (#25398599) Journal
    Buck Rogers: pending

    They did that in the 70's. The classic Buster Crabbe cinema serial dates back to the 30's, and the character dates to the late 20's.

    Hollywood has been raping childhood memories for a lot longer than you might think.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:23AM (#25398609)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:I hate Hollywood. (Score:2, Informative)

    by Amiralul ( 1164423 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:38AM (#25398815) Homepage
    You forgot Knight Rider, Superman (well, kind-of), Indiana Jones, Star Wars.
  • Re:no comment (Score:5, Informative)

    by Bandman ( 86149 ) <bandman.gmail@com> on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:42AM (#25398881) Homepage

    Not to be the trek fanboy I used to be, but Kirk was the youngest captain in starfleet history. I'm assuming this is before he was legendary, and I'm sure they're going to be making the movies about how he /became/ legendary. Anyway, carry on.

    PS - The Klingons didn't have a word for surrender...until they met Kirk

  • Re:Plot synopsis (Score:3, Informative)

    by Zymergy ( 803632 ) * on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:46AM (#25398937)
    Abrams loves to use the classic literary device named "in medias res" (Latin for "into the middle of things")
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_medias_res [wikipedia.org]
    Hope this movie is very well done and that the acting.... for... Kirk.... is... Overacted... IN... The ... True... Shatner... Style... (Though it will be very hard for any new Trek movie to top Montalban's Kahn villain character though...)
  • Re:I hate Hollywood. (Score:3, Informative)

    by Jesus_666 ( 702802 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:53AM (#25399055)
    They didn't do (as in "rape") Captain Future yet. Although one could argue that the Japanese already did that to the literary figure.


    Well, whatever they do, a Captain Future movie would be met with disapproval in Germany. We're used to having a version of Captain Future with our own special sound track (that, in my opinion, is vastly superior to the original one). In no way would we agree to a Captain Future movie with background music that doesn't sound like Feinde greifen an or Hurra, wir fliegen, not to mention Ken.

    To give you an impression of the German soundtrack here's a link [youtube.com] to Feinde greifen an ("Enemies attack"), essentially the action scene BGM. Oh, and the German opening [youtube.com]; after having sat through the American one I'm suddenly very happy that the German version was contractually obliged to have no lyrics.
  • Simon Pegg as Scotty (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Meoward ( 665631 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @09:54AM (#25399063)

    It's a good thing we have Shaun on board to keep this re-animated corpse under control.

    (Actually, I think it's really cool that he's involved. Might even make it worth watching.)

  • Alternate (Score:5, Informative)

    by waveformwafflehouse ( 1221950 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @10:11AM (#25399341) Homepage
    More here [trekweb.com]
  • by name_already_taken ( 540581 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @10:55AM (#25400069)

    You'd be suprised how little time it takes for the air to escape from a relatively small container such as the Enterprise into a practically infinite vacuum through a hole a few inch in diameter.

    What bothers me more is the smoke in the left side of the picture. Anyone here knows how smoke 'should' behave in space?

    Let's be generous and say a 10 cm hole - that's just under four inches.

    Well, I don't know the math, but I've worked around compressed air systems a little, and I found a little chart for gas flow through pipes of varying diameters and lengths. Air at atmospheric pressure is at 14.5 pounds per square inch - not very high pressure. This is not very high, so it's not like punching a hole in a compressed air tank.

    If we guess that the hull is 3 cm thick, and the hole is 10 cm in diameter (the hole is effectively a pipe), according to the ancient looking chart I found, the flow rate is 748 liters per second. (This is assuming I'm interpreting this correctly).

    I can't be bothered to do too much googling for this, but a Constitution class starship is 305 meters long. Let's just guess that it's 120 meters wide and an average of 20 meters thick. I know rabid trekkies will correct all this, but it's not important to be all that accurate. 305 x 120 x 20 = 732,000 cubic meters. That's 732 million liters, for those still reading. 732 million liters divided by 748 liters per second is 978,609 seconds to empty the ship to vacuum.

    That's 11.3 days to empty the ship through a 10 cm diameter hole. All based on guesses and an old chart from an engineering handbook, but it's better than just saying "little time".

    Of course, I could be wrong.

    It might take longer; especially when you consider that as the ship empties, the internal pressure drops - when half the air is gone, the atmospheric pressure inside is only 7.25 psi, so the flow rate is also reduced in half - so it might take a month or more to completely equalize the internal and external pressures (external being close to zero).

  • Re:no comment (Score:3, Informative)

    by thompson.ash ( 1346829 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @11:11AM (#25400313) Journal

    Talking of April...

    Wasn't Robert April captain of the Enterprise before Kirk?

    Hell, Robert April came before Pike...

    Or is this another Hollywood example of Continuity Be Damned...

    I suspect a lot of people are going to non-cannon this.

    It's like Kirk and Spock: The Frat Years

  • Re:no comment (Score:3, Informative)

    by bobdehnhardt ( 18286 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @11:48AM (#25400863)

    IIRC, Robert April was captain of the Enterprise during its final testing and shakedown, which was largely confined to local space (solar system). Christopher Pike was captian during the initial missions after the Enterprise was placed into active service, and was generally referred to as her first captain. Kirk was her second, more famous, captain.

    Hollywood shoulda called me - I've known this stuff for 40 years....

  • by name_already_taken ( 540581 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @11:49AM (#25400885)

    At what point does the atmospheric pressure become dangerous to people inside the ship?

    At 5.8 psi you become unconscious, but even at 90% of normal atmospheric pressure (13 psi) most people would be strongly affected by the reduced oxygen saturation.

    You can imagine that the internal structure of the ship would slow the flow the further away from the breach you are, so pressure would be lowest in the breached compartment, and higher as you move away from it. Seems like automatic airtight doors are a staple of Star Trek, so chances are only that one compartment or an area of the ship would be affected anyway.

    Plenty of time to get to an escape pod, transport out, or put on a space suit, anyway.

    Unless you're standing next to the hole and get stuck to it. In which case you'd seal it nicely, saving the air and getting a nasty bruise.

  • by Sj0 ( 472011 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @12:25PM (#25401429) Journal

    I have the solution to the problem of writers "phoning it in".

    We'll need to remodulate the tachyon emitters to emit a neoepinphrine pulse.

  • Re:no comment (Score:3, Informative)

    by Bemopolis ( 698691 ) on Thursday October 16, 2008 @01:03PM (#25401967)
    A good rule of thumb to use is: in a vacuum, a cloud of gas will expand at the current speed of sound in the gas. Of course, as it expands the sound speed drops, so the dispersal rate will drop drastically once the cloud, say, doubles in size. So, for the 10cm hole scenario in the GP post, the rate of air loss (area of hole x sound speed) would be about 150 cubic meters per minute at 1 atmosphere, not really an explosive decompression unless the flow rips the hole much wider.

    As for (emission) nebulae, they have the additional complications of arising from a self-gravitating molecular cloud and the fact that the expansion is isothermal (because of the nearby ionizing source. Also, they are honking huge, so it takes much longer to double in volume.
  • Re:no comment (Score:4, Informative)

    by Stargoat ( 658863 ) <stargoat@gmail.com> on Thursday October 16, 2008 @04:06PM (#25404535) Journal
    Nelson was a post captain at 23.
    John Paul Jones commanded his first fighting ship at 29.
    Cochrane took a 32 gun frigate with a 16 gun sloop at the age of 26.
    Steven Decatur fought the Barbary Pirates in a sloop at 24.
    Edward Pellew was made post at 23. His brother Israel was made a commander at 32.
    I could go through most of the list of captains at Trafalgar and do the same thing.

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...