White Space Debate Intensifies As Vote Approaches 94
Ars Technica reports that the debate between broadcasters and white space supporters has intensified after each side recently made inflammatory comments and suggested that science would vindicate their position. Several organizations are pushing to delay the upcoming white space vote, in part because it takes place on the same day as the US presidential election. We recently discussed Google's claim that a test of this system was rigged to fail. From Ars:
"The broadcasters contend that adjacent channel interference would be significant even at the 40 mW level proposed by Kevin Martin. In fact, they claim that such a device would interfere with digital television signals when the viewer is 25 miles from the television tower and the whitespace device is 10m or less from the TV set. At 50 miles from the television tower, a whitespace device within 50m from a set could allegedly cause interference. The broadcasters also want several safeguard requirements put on the technology that go beyond the new, lower-power transmission levels."
WHITESPACE... (Score:5, Funny)
Technical issues (Score:4, Funny)
As a representative of UltraProfitCom, I must point out that the use of 40 mW transmissions over the whitespace could raise very unpleasant technical issues. For example, it could damage the profitus of the entrenchedplayerus. It may also vastly increase the alternativus that individuals have for data transmission containing dangerous features like competitiveservicus. Left unchecked, these transmissions could also increase the convenientus that people have to do deal with. Clearly, it should not be done.
One side is clearly right (Score:5, Funny)
Tabs
Broadcasters want more segregation? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:There's an old saying... (Score:2, Funny)
I think he was reffering to the screaming.
Re:I'm not sure I like this "White Spaces Coalitio (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Imperial or metric? (Score:4, Funny)
Pffft. Down with the metric system. We don't need no foreign rulers.