Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Government United States News Your Rights Online

"Do Not Call" Violators Fined $1.2M 185

coondoggie writes "A federal court today spanked two telemarketers with some $1.2 million in civil penalties for violating the Federal Trade Commission's Do Not Call Rule. According to the FTC, the companies called consumers whose phone numbers were on the Do Not Call Registry without having obtained their express written agreement or having an 'established business relationship' with them. One group's telemarketers also allegedly abandoned many calls, by failing to connect the calls to a sales representative within two seconds after consumers answered, as required by law, the FTC stated. The cases were filed by the Department of Justice on behalf of the FTC."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

"Do Not Call" Violators Fined $1.2M

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Phone Spam (Score:3, Informative)

    by Culture20 ( 968837 ) on Wednesday January 28, 2009 @09:39AM (#26637723)

    I have a Virgin Mobile that I've been using now for nearly a year and I still get calls from all sorts of telemarketers who refuse to stop calling me, claiming I owe money or that my car warranty is about to expire. I recently made a report on one of these companies whose robo calls filled up my voice mail, only to recieve a letter back saying the report was 'unfounded' and wishing me a nice day.

    I'm not a lawyer, but I'm guessing that the law focuses on phone number and not on phone owner. So, since a business relationship was established with your phone number from the previous owner of the number, you might be screwed until some possible time-out period.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, 2009 @10:00AM (#26637945)

    Bennett Haselton has [judgejokes.com] documented [judgejokes.com] several [judgejokes.com] examples [judgejokes.com]. The incident based upon which he filed a formal complaint [judgejokes.com] against Judge Jorgensen is the most egregious example.

    /CF

  • by danaris ( 525051 ) <danaris@mac . c om> on Wednesday January 28, 2009 @11:56AM (#26639551) Homepage

    ...and I've gotten robocalls on my cell, too, saying my car warranty was going to expire.

    If, as you say, you have to have someone actually on the line, then no, they're not legal.

    Dan Aris

  • by bdenton42 ( 1313735 ) on Wednesday January 28, 2009 @12:08PM (#26639731)

    If you don't think 1.2 mil isn't big dollars to a SINGLE business, as opposed to an INDUSTRY, then you are mistaken. If it was a multi-billion dollar company sure - but someone is gonna feel some heat on this.

    Westgate Resorts http://www.westgateresorts.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=about_us.show_about_us [westgateresorts.com] was fined $900,000. They claim that they have "Over 10,000" employees, which means that the fine is less than $90 per employee (about a day and a half's pay at minimum wage). Just a small slap on the wrist for a company that size IMO.

  • Re:Phone Spam (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28, 2009 @04:14PM (#26643695)

    http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-258164A1.pdf [fcc.gov] (warning pdf - it was either this or a word .doc)

    "Telemarketing to cell phone numbers has always been illegal in most cases and will
    continue to be so."

    "FCC regulations prohibit telemarketers from using automated dialers to call cell phone
    numbers. Automated dialers are standard in the industry, so most telemarketers are
    barred from calling consumers on their cell phones without their consent."

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...