Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Science

Alaskans Prepare For Volcanic Eruption 293

An anonymous reader writes "Mount Redoubt, or Redoubt Volcano, is an active stratovolcano in the largely volcanic Aleutian Range of Alaska. The once quiet volcano has begun to roar once again. Its last eruption was in 1989 and geologists suggest that the next one is upon us. Alaskans who lived through the earlier eruption are stocking up on breathing masks and goggles. Starting on Friday, January 23 2009, the level of seismic activity increased markedly, and on Sunday AVO raised the Aviation Color Code to ORANGE and the Volcano Alert Level to WATCH. On the basis of all available monitoring data AVO regards that an eruption similar to or smaller than the one that occurred in 1989-90 is the most probable outcome. We expect such an eruption to occur within days to weeks." From the AP article: "Alaska's volcanoes are not like Hawaii's. 'Most of them don't put out the red river of lava,' said the observatory's John Power. Instead, they typically explode and shoot ash 30,000 to 50,000 feet high — more than nine miles — into the jet stream. 'It's a very abrasive kind of rock fragment,' Power said. The particulate has jagged edges and has been used as an industrial abrasive. 'They use this to polish all kinds of metals,' he said." The server for the Alaska Volcano Observatory appears to be overloaded and is unresponsive.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Alaskans Prepare For Volcanic Eruption

Comments Filter:
  • by txoof ( 553270 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:04AM (#26665585) Homepage

    I find this to be pretty exciting. I was just a little kid when St. Helens blew her top. I remember the ash coating our cars in Colorado. I thought it was so cool that it was snowing dirt.

    Then again, I don't live right under the thing and my home, livelihood, health and property aren't currently being threatened by microscopic airborne razor blades.

    Have any slashdot readers been close to an erupting volcano? Especially the subduction zone variety? Can you give us an account of what it's like?

    These ring-o-fire volcanoes usually explode rather than ooze due to the composition of their magma. There's lots of dissolved gasses that like to become undissolved in massive bangs.

  • by indi0144 ( 1264518 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:21AM (#26665771) Journal
    Have you ever being in an earthquake? those in which you can listen the earth "roaring"? A volcano it's a bit more frightening since earth roars, smells like the Erebus should smell and the sight of a 5 mile high gray cloud makes it apocalyptic.
  • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:23AM (#26665783) Homepage Journal

    Then again, I don't live right under the thing and my home, livelihood, health and property aren't currently being threatened by microscopic airborne razor blades.

    Those microscopic airborne razor blades will probably be distributed across much of the US due to the jet stream.

    On the plus side, a dust mask is probably sufficient protection for those without beards.

  • by wurble ( 1430179 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:27AM (#26665831)
    It can't be as bad as Katrina. There are currently over 1,000,000 people in the New Orleans metro area. That's AFTER Katrina; the population of new Orleans literally dropped in half since 2000. And Katrina affected a heck of a lot larger area than just the New Orleans metro.

    The entire state of Alaska has around 680,000 people.

    So while this has the potential to be a major disaster, it will never be anything as bad as Katrina in scale and number of people affected.
  • by lukej ( 252598 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:44AM (#26666069)
    If you mean by preparing, drinking some morning tea, and playing with my iPhone.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2009 @10:45AM (#26666077)
    You're right. Unlike the crappy job the City, Parish, and State governments did in preparation for a hurricane and the absolute lack of response they gave after "Katrina", lets ensure that the Alaskan City, County, and State governments do their job and make sure preparations are taken care of. Lets not forget the inconvenient fact that its the local governments job to response first... not sit on their ass and wait for Federal hand-outs.

    Based on all current reports, Alaaskan's are on top of it.
  • Re:Bah! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @11:05AM (#26666341) Journal

    Ah, I'd forgotten about that one. Yeah that was pretty cheesy. They did actually manage such a feat [articlesextra.com] in Iceland once upon a time. Of course it took millions of gallons of water (far more then you'd get from fire trucks) and they didn't stop the lava flow -- all they did was divert it from a harbor that they were trying to save.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2009 @11:08AM (#26666373)
    So you're saying 2000 years after Pompeii we still haven't figured out that living next to a volcano is a bad idea???

    The problem is that some of the most fertile ground you can find is right next to a volcano (usually, but not always). Not so important now, but it was hugely important during our agrarian days.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 30, 2009 @11:13AM (#26666441)

    Perhaps your hearing is limited in the low frequencies, or you haven't been in enough earthquakes, or you need to be in one away from buildings?

    I have been in countless minor but very local earthquakes and some major ones, and have often noticed a deep rumbling or "roaring" sound before the first bit of obvious shaking arrives. The local ones were the loudest, sometimes consisting of a rumble and then one sharp bang which sounded like something crashed into my house.

  • Re:Damn globe (Score:3, Informative)

    by INT_QRK ( 1043164 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @12:17PM (#26667285)
    I'd say more like Global Cooling. Stratospheric volcanic clouds are more likely to reflect sunlight back into space, thus are more likely to cause cooling than contribute significantly to greenhouse effect. See http://www.cotf.edu/ete/modules/volcanoes/vclimate.html [cotf.edu]
  • by element-o.p. ( 939033 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @02:45PM (#26669499) Homepage

    In comparison, my impression is that most of the Anchorage metro area is at risk from a tsunami.

    Negative. I've never seen it actually documented (or else I'd provide a link), but the urban legend (at least) in Anchorage is that Cook Inlet isn't conducive to tsunamis reaching the Anchorage area. Most of the water near Anchorage is pretty shallow, which you can verify for yourself by looking at Cook Inlet, Knik Arm and Turnagain Arm at low tide -- especially this time of year, when the glacial-fed rivers that empty into Knik and Turnagain arms are just barely trickling. Therefore, most of the energy of a tsunami would be dissipated before reaching Anchorage. Also, Anchorage sits on a ~100 foot high bluff. The airport elevation at Merrill Field is ~130 feet above sea level. While there are parts of Anchorage that are lower (the port and some of the area near the Coastal Trail), I suspect it would take a really large wall of water (which I already showed isn't likely) to flood most of Anchorage.

  • by Cally ( 10873 ) on Friday January 30, 2009 @03:28PM (#26670137) Homepage
    Actually,

    PALIN:And, Charlie, you're in Alaska. We have that very narrow maritime border between the United States, and the 49th state, Alaska, and Russia. They are our next door neighbors.We need to have a good relationship with them. They're very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.

    GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

    PALIN: They're our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.

Working...