Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government News Your Rights Online

The First Federally Certified Voting System 68

InternetVoting writes "The Election Assistance Commission has announced the first ever federally certified voting system. While the Election Management System (EMS) 4.0 by MicroVote General Corporation has successfully completed 17 months of testing, many questions still remain about the United States' voting system Testing and Certification program. Many systems are still being tested to obsolete standards, the current standards are set to become obsolete soon and cost estimates for future certifications are skyrocketing. The future of improved innovating voting systems does not look bright."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The First Federally Certified Voting System

Comments Filter:
  • by JimMarch(equalccw) ( 710249 ) on Saturday February 07, 2009 @10:39AM (#26763701)

    Some have even been booted out of the process for poor performance, most recently when NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) started looking at them. Systest was just kicked out, see this story and links from there for details:

    http://www.bbvforums.org/cgi-bin/forums/board-auth.cgi?file=/1954/79428.html [bbvforums.org]

    Cyber was so bad, you could jam a cheap pocket calculator halfway into a banana, pay 'em enough money and they'd have declared it "an acceptable election technology" or somedamnthing.

  • by cbiltcliffe ( 186293 ) on Saturday February 07, 2009 @10:57AM (#26763769) Homepage Journal

    Good to know.

    And realistically, wouldn't a paper ballot and a pencil be the first federally certified voting system?

    Or was that method so simple that no certification was deemed necessary?

    I'm not an American, so I'm making some assumptions here, and I'd really be interested in knowing this.

    If paper and pencil are certified, why the need for a second system?

    If paper and pencil are not certified, why the need for a system that's so complex that it needs certification in the first place?

    (Probably preaching to the converted with that last question, but still.....)

  • Re:Show me... (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday February 07, 2009 @11:33AM (#26763983)

    Why? You can't even prove that the machine that you're using to cast your vote is using the binary that was compiled from a particular source code, or that the processor abides by its specification and doesn't switch to internal memory when it encounters a specific sequence of commands. This whole certification business is hogwash. Either you trust the companies or you don't. If you don't trust them, you can't use their machines. Ask the DoD how that works.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...