| Google Apps Deciphered -- Compute in the Cloud to Streamline Your Desktop | |
| author | Scott Granneman |
| pages | 552 |
| publisher | Prentice Hall |
| rating | 7 |
| reviewer | Lorin Ricker |
| ISBN | 0-13-700470-2 |
| summary | A practical, comprehensive and useful guide to Google Apps |
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2009 Geeknet, Inc.
Summary (Score:3, Funny)
"Yippee! Automation TCO nirvana at last! Hooray! 'Well, just y'all hold up there a minit, lil' cowboy. Thar's a few thangs y'all oughta know 'bout afore ya go rushin' off...' If John Wayne didn't say exactly that, well, he should'a."
Shut the fuck up, Spongebob. Are you writing me a book review or trying to sell me a used car, asshole?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I know. My favourite is this one, from an English exam paper:
"Long separated by cruel fate, the star-crossed lovers raced across the grassy field toward each other like two freight trains, one having left Cleveland at 6:36 p.m. traveling at 55 mph, the other from Topeka at 4:19 p.m. at a speed of 35 mph. "
Re: (Score:2)
what? (Score:5, Insightful)
I dislike Google Apps as much as the next non-buzzword-compliant greyheard, but, Lorin Ricker, you just can't fucking write. For one thing, if you're going to write a quirky lead-in to an article, you have to be good at it, otherwise you sound like a blathering idiot. And you, my friend, aren't very good at it.
Please, take some freshman writing classes at your local community college. You appear to have some good points, but you just don't know how to say it.
Re:what? (Score:5, Funny)
Hez in ur intarweb, killing ur english.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I actually tried to make sense of the review. Rather than being about the book, it's actually about why he doesn't like Google Apps and why he's annoyed that a book on Google Apps doesn't spend its time agreeing with him.
Again, he's right. But it's like reading Dwakins fanboys defend evolution - they may be right, but they're such bad debaters and orators that they make Fred Phelps sound like Aristotle.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Here, let me help you out by suggesting you read the third paragraph:
I guess i
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. And just for you Anonymous, I read it again. There's a hell of a lot of description of what the book covers, and praise for getting what it gets right right. (I was, however, numbering paragraphs from 0. You guys got that, right?)
And that is a completely ridiculous thing to say.
Moderators! (Score:2)
Moderators: mark this "funny".
Hard work like this deserves to be rewarded.
Re:what? (Score:5, Funny)
Please, take some freshman writing classes at your local community college. You appear to have some good points, but you just don't know how to say it.
I'm going to have nightmares about being attacked by thousands of hyphens, each talking like a John Wayne impersonator on methamphetamines.
Parent
Re:what? (Score:4, Funny)
Shouldn't that nightmare be about thousands of em-dashes rather than hyphens? There aren't any hyphens in the review, except those in the last paragraph (which, incidentally, should be either em-dashes set closed or en-dashes set open, not pairs of hyphens.)
Also, anyone who sets em-dashes open, as is done in most of the review, shouldn't be allowed to use them at all.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Shouldn't that nightmare be about thousands of em-dashes rather than hyphens?
Hey, nightmares don't have to make sense.
Okay, okay, I stand corrected.
LR speaketh with silverlight tongue (Score:2)
Would that he had wooed beneath the Silverlight. Tis' Google that belies his trade. The thesaurus, grammar checker, and their link decayed doth kill his fire as the earthen blade!
Re: (Score:2)
Amen.
If one of my writing students handed me this mess, I'd hand it right back. I don't waste my time reading garbage like this.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
how about a little decorum?
You must be new here. How much did you pay for that slashdot ID?
Incredible. (Score:1)
I've not seen a more disjointed collection of words for a long time.
You're not quick, clever, witty, or even remotely talented at writing.
If you don't have the knack, stick to the facts.
Re:Incredible. (Score:5, Funny)
I've not seen a more disjointed collection of words for a long time.
Counting in nanoseconds, are we? This is slashdot.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
He thinks it sounds informal and conversational, but really he just didn't want to read his typing back to himself before hitting the submit button. Or proofread, or even start with an outline and think about what he was trying to convey.
Typewriter syndrome; communication by words, when sentences are required.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Incredible. (Score:5, Funny)
That's interesting. Tell me more.
Why do you say they have pseudo-humor?
Ha. Ha.
Parent
p0wn'd (Score:1)
I gotta be honest... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
mental rehab facility
... also known as a cubicle.
Re:I gotta be honest... (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, with everyone bitching, I still don't know what they were.
Re: (Score:2)
I made the same decision, gave up on the comments for the same reason, was about to make exactly your point.. and then I encountered your comment. Very strange sensation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
...They now have me posting here to tell you this so I can overcome my fears and once again enter society as a normal person.
First off, I've yet to actually meet a "normal person." Second, if I did I'm sure they would be in need of "-1, overrated" moderation. What would be so good about being normal? I'm certain they would be ill-equipped to handle reality. After all, it is full of people like us!
He can't even do as he says. (Score:2)
Really, then why are you doing it?
blurb (Score:1)
That was an extremely poorly written blurb. I had to come to the page to voice my hate before I realized it was some sort of review, which I don't plan to read since the blurb was such a turn-off
Saying one thing - yet doing another. (Score:5, Interesting)
Except - that's exactly what you do throughout your entire 'review'. Instead of actually review the book, you use continually use the contents of the books as springboard for expressing your point of view in that debate. Disingenuous at best. Dishonest at worst.
Paraphrase RMS you say? (Score:2)
I cannot, under any circumstances, imagine RMS saying: "Hold on there, pilgrim." You, Lorin Ricker, shall be visited this evening by the ghosts of beards past, present and future...
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you *so* much for that. Now, how am I suppose to sleep tonight? Time to call on an old friend: Oh Absolut [absolut.com], how I've missed you...
IBM, Microsoft, Google (Score:2)
Google Apps and "the Cloud" (sounds like a seventies pop group) is where Google becomes the new Microsoft.
The Great Unwashed will flock to move over to Google Apps and before they know it, they'll be locked in. They'll be beholden to Google.
You mark my words...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Google Apps and "the Cloud" (sounds like a seventies pop group) is where Google becomes the new Microsoft.
The Great Unwashed will flock to move over to Google Apps and before they know it, they'll be locked in. They'll be beholden to Google.
You mark my words...
Isn't it good that Google Docs saves documents to your desktop as ODF by default, can export PDF easily, and can read/export iCal format? Using open formats ensures that we can move to another platform if necessary.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft used to be pretty "open" at the start too.
Google Apps Source Code (Score:2)
function na(a,b){ return a.filter=b }
There are also a bunch of similarly named variables with common objects, li
Re: (Score:2)
Just sounds like Yahoo's YUI Compressor [yahoo.com]. It compresses the javascript to make it smaller by doing everything you just said. I use it on all my sites to save a few kb.
Re: (Score:2)
>> JavaScript is the new p-Code.
May $DEITY help us.
-dZ.
Why? (Score:2)
It will never be safe (Score:2)
IMHO cloud computing is impossible to secure. At best it is ALMOST safe. If you own the cloud, and the cloud is in a jar, and the jar is in a safe, and the safe is in a concrete room, and the room is in a lead building, and the lead building has a mote... If they are smart, Google will leave "beta" in its description forever.
Re: (Score:2)
IMHO cloud computing is impossible to secure.
To be more specific, the Google Cloud is impossible to secure against google.
There are a number of precedents that encourage careful people to worry about this. Google may not (for now) be as evil as Microsoft or IBM, but you'd be a fool to trust the data about your company or organization to google's hands. And everything in their Cloud is accessible to them.
Re: (Score:2)
To be more specific, the Google Cloud is impossible to secure against google.
Bloody oath, you put your finger on it. All we have is a mission statement to protect us.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you make a mistake here. It's NOT impossible to secure, for all you know Google could have done a good job, you don't know either way.
What you CAN say is that it is impossible to TRUST Google. You have no solid contracts, the company gets up to all sorts of shenanigans with your data (which, btw, you agreed to, read the T&Cs you accepted) and ownership and use of the information you store with them is very much in doubt.
I don't create a business dependency on companies I don't trust, even if I
Re: (Score:1)
Starring Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Gates?
Someone write a readable summary for this comment! (Score:2)
I still don't know what he was trying to say. I stopped reading after the second sentence or two because it was just unbearable and hurt my eyes.