EFF Says Obama Warrantless Wiretap Defense Is Worse than Bush 904
SonicSpike writes "The Electronic Frontier Foundation has just said that 'In the warrantless wiretapping case, Obama DOJ's new arguments are worse than Bush's.'"
The means-and-ends moralists, or non-doers, always end up on their ends without any means. -- Saul Alinsky
RTFS?? (Score:5, Funny)
*WE SHALL WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED!!*
Change We Can Listen in On! (Score:5, Funny)
Careful what you ask for... (Score:5, Funny)
Hey, you asked for a government that would listen to the people...
Now that you've got one, you're all mad and stuff. Man, this democracy stuff is weird. There's just no pleasing you people!
Wow?!?! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Change (Score:5, Funny)
Well.... he said change, and the EFF says his arguments are worse than Bush's, so I suppose that qualifies.
Comment removed (Score:1, Funny)
Re:This isn't a 180 (Score:3, Funny)
It's quite simply one word: Hope.
Won't somebody PLEASE THINK (Score:2, Funny)
Re:RTFS?? (Score:5, Funny)
So, when Bush does it, Bush is bad. When Obama does it, Bush is bad.
Re:RTFS?? (Score:2, Funny)
You're definitely not a "Great American" if you disagree with Bush, that's for sure.
Re:RTFS?? (Score:5, Funny)