Tata Building $7,800 Apartments in Mumbai 242
theodp writes "What do you do for an encore after you've shown the world it's possible to build a $2,000 car? Ratan Tata, head of India's giant Tata conglomerate, now plans to build, 30 miles outside of Mumbai, 1,200 tiny apartments that will sell for $7,800 to $13,400 each. Sure, they're small (floor plans), but keep in mind that you can pay a quarter of a million bucks for a 250-sq.-ft. studio in the East Village. Time reports that Tata has had to beef up security to handle the rush of buyers who want to plunk down their $200 deposits (yes, that's two hundred dollars!). Who would've thought you could make IKEA homes look pricey?" The Businessweek.com article says that the apartments are aimed at someone making $6,000 to $10,000 per year (Time says $5,000). In Mumbai, a call center operator with 10 to 20 years of experience barely qualifies at $6,400 annually. 70% of the country's 1.2 billion people live on 1/20 as much.
very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:2, Insightful)
i wouldn't be surprised if these buildings couldn't survive 45 mph winds
Re:very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:5, Insightful)
unsafe
As safe or safer than a motorcycle or bicycle. The word "unsafe" is thrown around all the time without regard for alternatives and real-life trade-offs.
Re:very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually you have more chance to survice a motorcycle crash than being rolled up in a tin can.
That aside, security standards aren't the same around the world and there are far less chance fo these tin cars to smash against a big SUV in india.
As for the apartments, they beat the slums by a long shot.
Tata's riding a wave... (Score:5, Insightful)
The economic difference between the rich and the poor is so vast, that if you are making 10k+ a year you are very rich by a normal villager's perspective...the problem is unless you are living in a rural area, there are not many places for you to live unless you want to live other than the slums or in a wealthy neighborhood.
Of course this is just a generalization, but if you ever go to India, and truly experience it outside of the MNC bubble, you will see why something like this is needed.
-n00b
Middle Class in India (Score:5, Insightful)
70% of the country's 1.2 billion people live on 1/20 as much.
True, but not relevant.
This is aimed at the middle class in India, which numbers 50 - 100 million now and is expected to grow rapidly [4hoteliers.com] :
India's middle class is expected to swell almost 12-fold from its size of 50 million people to over 583 million - some 41% of the population.
Let's see, 10 million homes for $ 10K each is $ 100 billion USD - a market worth going after.
Re:THIS IS NOT NEWS FOR NERDS!!! (Score:4, Insightful)
I dunno. The ability to build mass housing for cheap is rather interesting. Why not take the plans, modify them slightly, and then have low-cost housing in North America? Habitats for Humanity would probably do quite well in this situation. There's more than just tech nerds out there, remember. There's also social sciences nerds.
Re:Is this actually cheap? (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes... but 100km outside of Mumbai isn't Manhattan.
Re:Deflation at it's best or worst (sadly) (Score:4, Insightful)
Unfortunately, employed workers in the West (the US at least) have been creating shoddy, overpriced products that no one wants for some time now:
Giant cars that get horrid gas mileage; doctors and prescription drugs that routinely cause more harm than good; tiny, uninsulated, overcrowded apartments that cost more than houses; buggy, barely-functional software; industries that are less energy-efficient than those in developing countries; financial services that border on fraud.
And that's not even including any of the horrid government "services" which employ nearly half of everyone and no one has any say in even purchasing: prisons for substance abusers; welfare for immigrants; jack-booted thugs who murder Americans; spooks who spy on us; soldiers who waste trillions of dollars making us less secure; and of course generous hand-outs for banks and wealthy corporations.
Re:Another option for cheap housing (Score:3, Insightful)
Ever lived in a shipping container? I've worked out of one, converted into a temporary work space. They're hotter than hell in the summer (think solar heated oven) and bad in the winter too.
Note that I'm intentionally ignoring the pretty pictures in the linked to page
Re:not compared to the replacement (Score:5, Insightful)
I must admit, I'd buy and drive a Nano here in the US for in-town commuting.
But I'd totally shove a Hayabusa engine in it.
Re:Middle Class in India (Score:1, Insightful)
Basically, the first tier of folks who took American jobs.
Re:very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:5, Insightful)
safe is the biggest marketing scam in western society. SUVs were born to market safe vehicles for hockey moms, desire for safety got Bush re-elected.
Four syllable word, starts with I ends N (Score:2, Insightful)
Insulation
Re:Middle Class in India (Score:3, Insightful)
That's right a country with 1.2 billion has no domestic consumption/economy. They were all American jobs.
Re:THIS IS NOT NEWS FOR NERDS!!! (Score:1, Insightful)
Just make them 2 floors, 2nd floor is the main floor (stairs up to it) and the 1st floor has no windows.
Fake basements FTW
Re:THIS IS NOT NEWS FOR NERDS!!! (Score:3, Insightful)
"Why not take the plans, modify them slightly, and then have low-cost housing in North America?"
I take you have never been involved in the zoning approval process for a low income housing project in the US. If you had been you would learn how much hysteria can be generated by the thought that the value of a middle class American's house could be dented by the presence of a less expensive alternative.
Re:very cheap + little material =unsafe (Score:3, Insightful)
People are just slowly producing larger and larger scams, so at any time one of the current scams is guaranteed to be the biggest evar.