The Credibility Issues of MS's CodePlex Foundation 137
alphadogg writes 'Microsoft's new CodePlex Foundation has serious flaws to correct if it wants to become a credible force in the open source industry, and attract a diverse collection of developers and participants, according to an expert in forming consortia and foundations. Andy Updegrove, a lawyer and founder of ConsortiumInfo.org, says Microsoft has created with CodePlex a rigid foundation that has almost no wiggle room and a poorly crafted governance structure that concentrates authority at the top and leaves little power to others who might join the foundation.' Here is Andy's detailed analysis of CodePlex's structure: "Over the past 22 years, I've helped structure scores of open, consensus based consortia and foundations, and represented over 100 in all... In this blog entry, I'll show where I think the legal and governance structure of CodePlex has wandered off the open path, and offer specific recommendations for how the structure could be changed to give people (other than Microsoft business partners) confidence that CodePlex will be an organization worth joining."
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Why bother? (Score:4, Interesting)
You know, I really wonder why MS even bothers getting into open source.
If Microsoft tries to get into open source, it's seen as a move to stranglehold OSS Development and software.
If Microsoft closes the door and goes completely proprietary, it's seen as a move to stranglehold OSS Development and software.
Ballmer should say screw it and just go back to the 90's and steamroll all over the competition. If the government gets involved, split all the divisions into separate companies, get them all to join some consortium group, and keep on steamrolling away.
At least the M$ moniker would have meaning again.
Re:and attract a diverse collection of developers (Score:3, Interesting)
Because I'm sure my Linux on [insert device here] port will look just fine on CodePlex.
Hmm. MS's recommended migration path from Visual FoxPro is to .NET and SQL Server. I wrote a tool [sourceforge.net] to simplify migration of VFP databases to PostgreSQL instead. Wonder if they'd like to host it for me?
Re:and attract a diverse collection of developers (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't help but look at the term "Microsoft Reciprocal License" and think:
Under the MSRL, Microsoft screws you, and you, in turn, are screwed by Microsoft.