Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in

Comments: 245 +-   Large Hadron Collider Scientist Arrested For al-Qaeda Ties on Sunday October 11, @07:12AM

Posted by timothy on Sunday October 11, @07:12AM
from the now-that's-gratitude-for-ya dept.
news
mindbrane writes "A scientist working as a subcontractor on a peripheral LHC project has been arrested as a terrorist. The CBC is running a story outlining the arrest of a man on Thursday in south-east France for suspected al-Qaeda links: 'CERN officials said the man, whose name has not been revealed, was working under contract with an outside institute and said he had no contact with anything that could have been used for terrorism. He had been at CERN since 2003, officials said. ... The news that someone with terrorist connections might have worked at the facility is likely to cause concern because of both the high profile of the giant physics experiment and also the technology in use, which has made some members of the public nervous.'"
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Inominate (412637) on Sunday October 11, @07:16AM (#29710365)

    He could cause the creation of a blackhole that will kill us all!

    Or he could cause a couple of magnets to quench and suck up even more money!

    Maybe the two are related?

  • Evil to level 11 !! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Nomen Publicus (1150725) on Sunday October 11, @07:22AM (#29710391)
    All he had to do was to twist the "EVIL LEVEL" knob to 11 and a portal to hell would have been opened!
  • by AmonTheMetalhead (1277044) on Sunday October 11, @07:24AM (#29710405)
    Everyone can be linked to Al Qaeda
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by Eudial (590661)

      Wasn't he on top of that arrested because he was suspected of being related to someone they suspected of knowing someone they suspected was part of what they suspected was Al Qaeda?

    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 11, @08:21AM (#29710687)

      Everyone can be linked to Al Qaeda

      Some in a lot less than six degrees. Remember Bush was friends with Osama Bin Laden's family. It's not trolling it's a fact. The whole point is the same world leaders that are supposed to be fighting terrorism have close ties to terrorist families or are at least only a few degrees from most terrorist leaders.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Kaiser Wilhelm and Czar Nicholas were cousins, and yet their countries were largely responsible for starting WWI...point being?

      • by PPH (736903) on Sunday October 11, @01:48PM (#29712419)

        We funded and armed the predecessors of the Taliban in their fight against the Soviets. And we continued to support them in their suppression of criminal warlords and the opium trade through the mid 1990s. Since the Taliban and al Qaida cooperate and share personnel, its quite probable that 'we' (through the CIA or overtly through the State Department) have supported al Qaida in the past.

        We have a dismal history of keeping tabs on our friinds while we carefully monitor those we consider to be our enemies. But then that's just human nature.

  • WMD'S? (Score:5, Funny)

    by therufus (677843) on Sunday October 11, @07:28AM (#29710419)

    Large Hadron Collider. Now THAT'S a weapon of mass destruction.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 11, @07:32AM (#29710439)

    so you don't have to DO anything anymore to get arrested? He was arrested for "al-Qaeda ties"? what does that mean exactly? Did he kill anyone? Did he plot to kill anyone? Did he know about a plot to kill anyone? It sounds like his sister's friend's neighbor had a cousin who was friends with someone in Al Qaeda back in 1990.

    Also, from TFA: "The news that someone with terrorist connections might have worked at the facility is likely to cause concern because of both the high profile of the giant physics experiment and also the technology in use, which has made some members of the public nervous"

    So people are concerned about someone (with terrorist connections) MIGHT have worked at the facility?!?? OMG that's a reason to start rounding up everybody with brown skin!
    Geesh

    • by rawls (1462507) on Sunday October 11, @07:40AM (#29710481)

      so you don't have to DO anything anymore to get arrested? He was arrested for "al-Qaeda ties"?

      Nobody likes novelty ties. It is about time some legislation was put in place to deal with them.

    • by mike449 (238450) on Sunday October 11, @10:38AM (#29711309)

      I know a guy who's father was on very good terms with Bin Laden, and even supplied him with weapons and money.
      Oh, wait, that was _before_ he "became a terrorist"...

    • by Xest (935314) on Sunday October 11, @02:04PM (#29712489)

      From the articles I've seen about it, he was arrested for communicating the will to commit terrorist acts and had been seeking advice and information on doing just that. He was effectively at the very start of the planning stage.

      Make of that what you will, if they have evidence of intent he could well be a dangerous person.

      It really comes down to what evidence they really did have, and what was included in those communications for which he was arrested.

      The problem is, you and I don't know what evidence they actually do have, and unless we do we can't say if the arrest was justified or not so it seems pointless speculating. If he was picked up simply out of paranoia because he was phoning uncle Abdullah in Pakistan then yeah, it's rediculous. If he was however phoning Mr Mehsud of the Taliban and asking for information producing bombs from house hold material and information on which targets Al Qaeda would most like him to blow up and what kind of casualty figures they were looking for then it's a different story.

      It's a shame it rarely ever comes out what their evidence actually was so we can properly check the validity of arrests like this.

  • by timmarhy (659436) on Sunday October 11, @07:32AM (#29710443)
    .. Obama had fixed this already?!
        • Re:But i thought... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by m.ducharme (1082683) <`moc.liamg' `ta' `emrahcud.cram'> on Sunday October 11, @10:24AM (#29711239)

          More seriously, Obama winning the prize reflects poorly on the Nobel committee, not on him.

          I worked in a pizza place where the manager had an interesting strategy for improving the performance of some employees. He would give a particular employee, who'd been slacking, the Employee of the Month Award. Getting this award would often encourage that employee to pick it up, and they'd become diligent enough to deserve the award. Maybe the Nobel committee is hoping for the same effect here? They gave a Peace prize to Yasser Arafat some time ago as well, as I recall.

  • by M8e (1008767) on Sunday October 11, @07:43AM (#29710497)

    I want an al-qaeda tie. I don't care what colour it is, i want one!

  • . . . it seems pretty capable of breaking itself on its own, with any outside help

  • Better news article (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 11, @08:55AM (#29710819)

    This is a much better news article than the one from CBC:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/nuclear-terror-suspect-is-top-physicist-1800927.html

    It names the suspect and it explains how he was tracked and arrested.
    According to the article, the suspect studied for his PhD at the Stanford University Linear Accelerator Center, stayed at EPFL and has published several articles.

      • by westlake (615356) on Sunday October 11, @02:35PM (#29712649)
        First off, it's hard to believe guys like this decide to blow things up.

        It isn't hard to believe at all.

        Intellectuals of a certain type have always been attracted to games of espionage, treason and conspiracy - and "game" is, I think, the right word here:

        Cambridge Five, [wikipedia.org] Whittaker Chambers [wikipedia.org]

        Most probably don't expect to be around when things blow up - but now and again you may find an exception: 2001 Anthrax Attacks [wikipedia.org]

        These guys are so smart.

        The geek really ought to have learned by now that the smart and the arrogant make stupid mistakes. Hans Reiser [wikipedia.org]

  • by AlgorithMan (937244) on Sunday October 11, @08:55AM (#29710821) Homepage
    And I thought after we got rid of george w bush, all the "al quaeda this" and "axis of evil that" and "osama this" and "emmanuel goldstein that", "give me all your money and all your rights or they'll kill you" would finally stop...

    you know the literal translation of the word "terror" from latin is "fear" and a "terrorist" by definition is someone who makes you afraid. some people make you afraid by crashing planes or detonating bombs in your country or by sending you terror-threat videos. some people make you afraid by constantly telling you there was a bogeyman that is about to kill you - using his weapons of mass destruction unless we start a war etc.

    wake up! your own government and your own media terrorize you far worse than al quaeda ever did! If you run scared everytime someone says "bogeyman", then the terrorists have won, because you are scared and THAT is exactly what they WANT
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by couchslug (175151)

      "And I thought after we got rid of george w bush, all the "al quaeda this" and "axis of evil that" and "osama this" and "emmanuel goldstein that", "give me all your money and all your rights or they'll kill you" would finally stop..."

      Being paranoid over Al Qaeda doesn't meant they aren't a viable threat, though paranoia doesn't make for well thought-out policy decisions.

  • I am french (Score:3, Informative)

    by aepervius (535155) on Sunday October 11, @10:09AM (#29711161)
    And I do not trust the DST (or whatever it is called nowadays) as far as I can throw them. Even less than that. I can remember the "rainbow warrior" ship story, for example. It could very possible that they found a real idiot planning to do a terrist attack, or it is possible this is polically motivated and somebody needed that sort of "news" for nefarious purpose. We'll see in the next days.
  • by Hurricane78 (562437) <<moc.liamelgoog> <ta> <inamaz.divan>> on Sunday October 11, @12:25PM (#29711935)

    [...] the arrest of a man on Thursday in south-east France for suspected al-Qaeda links: 'CERN officials said the man, whose name has not been revealed, was working under contract with an outside institute and said he had no contact with anything that could have been used for terrorism. [...]'

    You have to decide: Either he's in arrest for a crime, or he is suspected and nothing is known or proven yet (and most likely never will).
    I mean it's right in there: They have not found any ties. They just kinda heard from someone that kinda he could somehow be in an organization that somehow kinda could possibly be linked to...uuum...something.
    One parrot tells it to the next parrot, and soon it's al-Quaeda, and he's arrested for shit.

    But a friend told me that he came from Morocco to France, and the cops there were just like in Morocco. When he came to Germany, he was shocked, that the cops treated him like a human being. (And our cops still are on the level of semi-criminal bouncers who beat up people because they like to. [youtube.com] It must be pretty damn bad in France.)
    So I can comprehend how it can come to shit like this. But that does not make it OK.

    I will wait and see what charges they bring up (if any). Or if it's the usual witch trial, like in those countries... you know... where "terrorism" "comes from"...

    • by FireFury03 (653718) <slashdot.nexusuk@org> on Sunday October 11, @07:23AM (#29710397) Homepage

      So al-Qaeda won't sue for trademark infringement?

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by ionix5891 (1228718)

      How do you kick ass of an organisation that didnt exist in first place?

      if you tell a lie often enough....

      • Re:Disbelieve (Score:5, Interesting)

        by 4D6963 (933028) on Sunday October 11, @08:15AM (#29710649)
        It does exist, although only in the sense that the group Anonymous exists. That's the same lack of hierarchy/organisation/official structure. In my analogy, moot = Osama bin Laden.
      • by S3D (745318) on Sunday October 11, @08:50AM (#29710797)
        The Foundation (Al-Quaeda in Arabic) will be created in 12000 years by Harry Seldon, as the result of nuclear proliferation initiated by time-traveling terrorist, inspired by subversive element from Hidden Centuries.
    • by K. S. Kyosuke (729550) on Sunday October 11, @07:56AM (#29710553)

      A religious al-Qaeda scientist, without a name. Why do I not believ this.

      I don't believe it as well. It's much more likely that this physicist belongs to the the notorious 'Al-Jabr' group that want to enslave the world with their weapons of Math instruction.

    • by MrMr (219533) on Sunday October 11, @08:11AM (#29710625)
      You mean: A scientist who knows a religious person that may have been involved in a group of which certain members claimed to be associated with Al Qaeda?
      I'd say he's guilty, as in guilt by association in the third degree.
      I'm not worried until somebody is busted for being tied with Al Qaeda in the sixth degree. [wikipedia.org]
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by jc42 (318812)

        I'm not worried until somebody is busted for being tied with Al Qaeda in the sixth degree.

        It's also fun to note that, under the Kevin Bacon scheme, George W Bush and Osama bin Laden have only one degree of separation. They have both been together in not just one, but two movies. Those movies were documentaries, of course, but that's a trivial detail that wouldn't stop any journalist from saying that they are "linked".

        One of the movies was Micheal Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11". I've forgotten the other one and

    • Re:old news? (Score:4, Informative)

      by dword (735428) on Sunday October 11, @07:42AM (#29710495)

      I thought that this was covered in the press last week, so why is it in /. now??

      Because /. is mostly an aggregator and doesn't bring in fresh news. It just puts all the "news for nerds" that you can find out there in one place.

Necessity is a mother.