1/3 of People Can't Tell 48Kbps Audio From 160Kbps 567
An anonymous reader writes "Results of a blind listening test show that a third of people can't tell the difference between music encoded at 48Kbps and the same music encoded at 160Kbps. The test was conducted by CNet to find out whether streaming music service Spotify sounded better than new rival Sky Songs. Spotify uses 160Kbps OGG compression for its free service, whereas Sky Songs uses 48Kbps AAC+ compression. Over a third of participants thought the lower bit rate sounded better."
Did they use the mosquito sound? (Score:2, Funny)
If they used the "mosquito" - then lots of people would just randomly pick something :-) Or just say things like "Hey! What's that ringing in my ear!"
Anonymous Coward (Score:1, Funny)
Did you have to close your eyes during the test. Why is it called a blind listening test?
Even worse (Score:5, Funny)
In a deaf listening test, 100% couldn't tell the difference between a 160Kbps OGG file and a cannon. Though 3% noted the smell of gunpowder.
Yeah, but they weren't listening through Monster.. (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, but they weren't listening through Monster Cable, you can't tell the difference between anything without Monster equipment...
Re:Relevant ? (Score:3, Funny)
It depends. Were they dragged by the ears?
Re:In other news (Score:5, Funny)
You think that math is troubling? I'm still trying to figure out how to divide a group of 16 people into thirds without staining the carpet.
RTFA (Score:1, Funny)
There is no disclaimer that nobody was harmed during the tests.
That said, I am sure there are multiple [wikipedia.org] ways to divide 16 people in three equally sized groups.
Re:Are these the same people... (Score:4, Funny)
Not to mention video compression [xkcd.com]
Re:In other news (Score:5, Funny)
You think that math is troubling? I'm still trying to figure out how to divide a group of 16 people into thirds without staining the carpet.
Considering its a lossy mp3 compression test, 16/3 = 5 is close enough for most people not to notice.
Re:Are these the same people... (Score:3, Funny)
"IMO some electronic music sounds better with lossy compression"
IMHO, hip-hop and rap sound infinitely better with 100% lossy compression but that's just me :-)
Re:In other news (Score:1, Funny)
They started with 16 people. But they used Barry White's music in the test and ended with 18.
Re:The number should be doubled. (Score:3, Funny)
NOOOO!!!!
Did you have to do it? You just ruined over a hundred (or more[1]) years worth of mathematics in statistics.
Now every Gallup done so far must be discredited, every medical experiment redone, eve..
My brain hurts, I cannot even think of the chil..consequences.
[1] depends on how your stat...calendar looks like
Re:Did they use the mosquito sound? (Score:3, Funny)
But, but... in those expensive digital cables a bit is much more 1 than in a cheap cable where a bit is more like... 1-ish. The hardware and software still sees that as 1, but you have to admit it dramatically impacts audio quality to have a true 1 instead of something which is 1 but not quite as 1 as a real 1.
Now if your amplifier was made out of huge tesla coils, a better shielded cable might improve audio quality a bit.