Children Using Technology Have Better Literacy Skills 146
Posted
by
timothy
from the exactly-as-useful-as-other-self-assessments dept.
from the exactly-as-useful-as-other-self-assessments dept.
eldavojohn writes "A UK study of three thousand children aged nine to sixteen suggests something that may not come as a shock to geeks: using technology increases a child's core literary skills. As Researcher Obvious put it, 'The more forms of communications children use the stronger their core literary skills.' And for those of us worried about a world of 'tl;dr' and 'Y U H8n?' the research claims that 'text speech' does not damage literacy. The biggest shortcoming of this research is that it appears the children graded their own writing in that their methodology was an online survey designed to ask the children which technology they use and then follow up with asking them how well they write to determine which children have better literacy skills."
Re:Huge Fail (Score:5, Insightful)
Tell me about it.. a self-selecting group of people grade themselves? How on earth is that scientific?
you know... (Score:5, Insightful)
Correlation is not causation (Score:5, Insightful)
Neither the BBC article nor the researchers make this claim. They just say that it is correlated with better literacy.
Zero value study (Score:5, Insightful)
This is not merely a shortcoming, it is a devastating hole that renders the study utterly useless. This has to be about the dumbest survey I've ever heard of. No conclusions can be drawn from a self-assessment of ones own ability. Other research has shown a correlation between lack of ability and overestimation of ability in self-assessment.
so... (Score:5, Insightful)
So, really, the only conclusion we can draw from this is that 'the more technology one uses, the better they think their literacy is." Great.
Phonetically similar words (Score:3, Insightful)
using technology increases a child's core literary skills. As Researcher Obvious put it, 'The more forms of communications children use the stronger their core literary skills.' And for those of us worried about a world of 'tl;dr' and 'Y U H8n?'
I don't know about literary skills, but I see an abundance of wrong spellings of words that don't have the right meaning but phonetically are almost the same. An example is 'of' instead of 'have'. E.g. someone may write "he would of done this" instead of "he would have done this". Probably caused by trying to write too fast and not thinking about what they wrote, and that's a phenomenon that I've only seen the last 4 years or so (I think I first spotted this in a subtitle for Torchwood. I almost couldn't believe my eyes, that such a mistake was made by the BBC). If that time estimate is correct for when this sort of thing started, then possibly technology, or probably better the entire lifestyle (fast paced, short attention span, exacerbated by TV's ads that interrupt programs) in the west these days, may be the cause of this.
Re:Huge Fail (Score:2, Insightful)
"Tell me about it.. a self-selecting group of people grade themselves? How on earth is that scientific?"
Happens all the time, it's called peer review.
Re:I'm not surprised (Score:3, Insightful)
Basic things like that slip through spell checks all the time, and I'm always seeing otherwise literature people misusing words like that.
self-referential?
Re:you know... (Score:1, Insightful)
If I'm not mistaken, the OP was humorously pointing out the error of implying that "correlations" are meaningful, not claiming there was no causality.
BTW, it's my opinion that parental involvement has much more of an effect than the "wealth" of the school (at the K12 level).