Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Censorship News Your Rights Online

Wikileaks Targets the Local News Frontier 57

Posted by kdawson
from the think-locally-disrupt-globally dept.
eldavojohn writes "Wikileaks has been pretty successful on a global scale — from ACTA documents to East Anglian e-mails, it is the definitive place to find suppressed documents. But some are saying that now Wikileaks should begin focusing on a local level. From the article: 'The organization has applied for a $532,000 two-year grant from the Knight Foundation to expand the use of its secure, anonymous submission system by local newspapers. The foundation's News Challenge will give as much as $5 million this year to projects that use digital technology to transform community news. WikiLeaks proposes using the grant to encourage local newspapers to include a link to WikiLeaks' secure, anonymous servers so that readers can submit documents on local issues or scandals. The newspapers would have first crack at the material, and after a period of time — perhaps two weeks, [German Wikileaks spokesman Daniel] Schmitt said — the documents would be made public on the main WikiLeaks page.' Anyone reading this who works for a community news source and would like to host sensitive documents with no risk: here is your solution."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wikileaks Targets the Local News Frontier

Comments Filter:
  • by 0xdeadbeef (28836) on Tuesday December 22 2009, @07:53PM (#30531054) Homepage Journal

    The organization has applied for a $532,000 two-year grant from the Knight Foundation to expand the use of its secure, anonymous submission system by local newspapers.

    Wouldn't that money be better spent on a prissy talking car?

  • Sweet! (Score:4, Funny)

    by sootman (158191) on Tuesday December 22 2009, @08:05PM (#30531152) Homepage Journal

    The organization has applied for a $532,000 two-year grant from the Knight Foundation to expand the use of its secure, anonymous submission system by local newspapers.

    I knew the Knight Foundation [wikipedia.org] was real! Oh, how the kids in 4th grade used to tease me when I said I wanted to go work for them...

  • by atheistmonk (1268392) on Tuesday December 22 2009, @08:33PM (#30531356) Homepage
    If you let me cry on your shoulder, you can also cry on my shoulder.
  • by AnotherUsername (966110) on Wednesday December 23 2009, @02:51AM (#30533186)
    Bloggers are idiots. Lumping them in with journalists is like saying that a 5 year who draws a stick picture of his family is in the same group as a Renaissance artist. These are the same people saying that Obama wasn't born in the U.S. and that Bush caused 9/11. Give me a break.

    - Journalists study for years, and fight to get a good job with a reputable news agency.
    - Bloggers have a computer, and a website(oftentimes only a free account that took 10 minutes to start up).

    - Journalists spend their workday following up on leads, researching stories, and fact checking.
    - Bloggers do their 'research' by checking other blogs, and occasionally looking stuff up on wikipedia.

    - Journalists worry about libel and slander lawsuits constantly, because it could mean their job if they don't have the facts to back up their claims. If a tip turns out to be fraudulent, they could be in deep water, not only with their job, but with the courts.
    - If a blogger prints faulty information...I don't know. You never really hear about it, because they don't own up to it. A retraction, on a blog? Fat chance. Whatever the information, they'll just either pass blame, or they'll deny that it is wrong, or they will just delete it and pretend it never happened.

    I hate bloggers.

These PRESERVES should be FORCE-FED to PENTAGON OFFICIALS!!

Working...