Denmark Chooses OpenDocument Format 198
Seahawk was one of several readers to write in with news of Denmark's decision to embrace ODF. "On Friday morning Denmark decided to choose ODF over Microsoft's OOXML. For now the decision is only effective for governmental institutions, but regions and municipalities will most likely follow some time in the future. The decision has unfolded over a period of four years, and many open source advocates were fearing the worst, but it looks like the minister finally caved in and listened to what a lot of people were saying." While in transition away from Microsoft Office formats, the Danes may find use for this new OpenOffice integration guide (sent in by reader AdeleWard).
Re:Queue the Complimentary Office 2k7 Licenses in. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Wrong decision (Score:5, Interesting)
As a free market libertarian, I think this move sucks, and anyone with half a brain should too.
As a free market Libertarian, I think you'd be well advised to learn why a group would choose an open standard that multiple vendors can compete for, rather than a closed (ISO can kiss my ass), single-vendor product.
Re:Wrong decision (Score:4, Interesting)
I only mention this because it happens to me all of the time. Usually with different versions of MS Word but in this case it can't even read its own file from the same version.
Re:Wrong decision (Score:3, Interesting)
-- Government chooses a proprietary format
-- Everybody who is part of "the market" inevitably has to interact with the government and their documentation.
-- The software of the company owning said format, regardless of its merits, is the only one that can be used to comunicate with the government.
-- "The market" can go fuck itself selecting the best product.
-- Government chooses an open, unencumbered with patents format
-- Everybody who is part of "the market" inevitably has to interact with the government and their documentation.
-- Anyone can write software that can be used to comunicate with the government.
-- "The market" can freely choose whichever products they fancy.
And you seem to be absolutely right, only evil socialist governments and the pinko commies who've elected them seem to understand these two simple concepts. Hoorah for libertarianism.
Re:It's CUE (Score:2, Interesting)
No formula standard (Score:1, Interesting)
How are you supposed to use a spreadsheet to calculate your taxes when there is no standard for formulas in spreadsheets?
Re:Wrong decision (Score:3, Interesting)
One of my teachers last semester created Powerpoints. He saved them in
*I have NO IDEA what version of office he was using to create them.* Likely to be 07 though
Re:Apple, please help. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:another step in the right direction (Score:3, Interesting)
Hence the "first step"...
Once you have open standards, then MS get pushed into the relatively small niche of people who need the extra features of excel and powerpoint and are willing to pay a premium for them... The rest of the "sally secretary", home user and casual user types get OO because it saves a lot of money.
The only reason this isn't happening already is because of proprietary format lock-in.
I've worked at a lot of companies of various sizes, and most of them spend ridiculous sums of money to have msoffice on every desktop, yet the majority of those users use the apps to view files sent to them by others, or to type up/modify very simple letters. Most of these users would find wordpad more than adequate for their needs.