Forgot your password?

typodupeerror
Earth Transportation Power Technology

Electric Bicycles Surging In Popularity 533

Posted by kdawson
from the look-ma-no-feet dept.
gollum123 writes "An accidental transportation upheaval began in China, where an estimated 120 million electric bicycles now hum along the roads, up from a few thousand in the 1990s. They are replacing traditional bikes and motorcycles at a rapid clip and, in many cases, allowing people to put off the switch to cars. The booming Chinese electric-bike industry is spurring worldwide interest and impressive sales in India, Europe, and the US. China is exporting many bikes, and Western manufacturers are also copying the Chinese trend to produce models of their own. From virtually nothing a decade ago, electric bikes have become an $11 billion global industry. In the Netherlands, a third of the money spent on bicycles last year went to electric-powered models. Industry experts predict similar growth elsewhere in Europe, especially in Germany, France, and Italy, as rising interest in cycling coincides with an aging population. India had virtually no sales until two years ago, but its nascent market is fast expanding and could eclipse Europe's in the next year. In China, electric bicycles have evolved into bigger machines that resemble Vespa scooters. These larger models are causing headaches for global transportation planners. They cannot decide whether to embrace them as a green form of transportation, or ban them as a safety hazard. Some cities are studying the halfway measure of banning them from bicycle lanes while permitting them on streets."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Electric Bicycles Surging In Popularity

Comments Filter:
  • by DigiShaman (671371) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:48AM (#30991642) Homepage

    As someone who spends a week each year in Shanghai, this is nothing special. These bikes are nasty rusty things. Often found in shades of silver and brown with broken seats and bent baskets. The owners don't understand the concept of pride in their own possessions. I find this behavior quite foreign to me, but I suppose that's because I'm an American. In short, leave-it-out-to-rust is the Chinese motto.

    Oh, and for all you living in Shanghai, could you PLEASE for the love of God, change your moped brake pads? That high pitched squealing makes my ears ring :-p.

  • by siloko (1133863) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:51AM (#30991666) Homepage
    I'm sure electric bikes have a use but I always feel a bit sad when I see a twenty-something dude riding an electric bike whilst I scoot past on my pushbike. O and transportation planners - don't get me started! In my town to satisfy a push for more cycle paths they simply painted a picture of a white cycle at the head of all the sidewalks . . . chaos and injury ensued. No back tracking though - just some back-slapping about implementing a 'green' transportation policy!
  • by YojimboJango (978350) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:52AM (#30991670)

    I'll second Parent here. I have a two and a half mile ride to work, but I'd have to cross two interstates and a 6 lane highway to get there. I can do it in the summer, but trying to get a bike through 6 inches of snow in the dark mornings while dodging traffic isn't fun or safe.

    Down south this might be more viable as a car replacement, but up in Michigan I need a car 4 months out of the year. It sucks, and I end up paying more for PLPD than I do for gas, but it has to be done.

  • Americans Pay More (Score:4, Interesting)

    by hedgemage (934558) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:56AM (#30991680)
    I know a guy who, after a trip to China a couple years ago, decided to start up an electric bike business in Portland, Oregon which is one of the most bike-friendly cities in the US. He originally wanted to import the bikes from China, but due to trade restrictions, he couldn't bring in bikes which he could sell here for $US400-600 and instead had to fill his new shop with US and European models that cost 3 to 5 times more.
    He did his research, so it wasn't like the Chinese bikes were painted with lead and made by slave labor or anything. Anyone have any idea why electric bikes would be on the import no-no list?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:57AM (#30991694)

    While some twenty-something dudes would otherwise be riding a normal bicycle, most would be driving a car. If it takes electric bicycles to kill the idea that cycling is a sport instead of an efficient form of transportation, so be it.

  • by MichaelSmith (789609) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:18AM (#30991806) Homepage Journal

    I wonder about how safe they are. My heart rate scales with the speed I travel and my reflexes tend to scale the same way. Sometimes I get scared riding with a strong tail wind because I feel that I am going faster than my body is setup to do.

    The other thing is that sometimes I need to go slow, and sometime I need to go very fast. A power limited electric motor can't do the latter and would make me feel vulnerable in traffic.

  • Energy (Score:4, Interesting)

    by BlackHawk-666 (560896) <ivan.hawkes@gmail.com> on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:20AM (#30991820) Homepage

    In an age when most of us could do with more exercise, not less, and could reduce energy usage not increase it - these seem like a bad idea. It will be interesting to see if the percentage of people who are obese in either of these countries increase in parallel with the switch to electric bikes.

    I've been to Amsterdam, spent a few weeks there, and you'd be amazed at how few people are fat in that city - a lot of which can be contributed to the fact the ride everywhere. Compare that to the US, Britain, and even Australia - and it's quite the difference. America of course wins the prize - so if anything you guys need more incentive to ride pushbikes, not less.

  • in japan... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by biggknifeparty (618904) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:21AM (#30991824)
    Almost every Japanese senior citizen rides one of these... surprisingly fast. They're expensive too there, like $700 dollars. Also, they don't lock them up because generally in Japan people don't steal things.
  • by mirix (1649853) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:25AM (#30991852)
    I doubt that, as there's nothing like RoHS in North America, and every car has lead acid batteries, regardless.
    There are plenty of sealed lead acid batteries around (old people scooters for example, a similar device...).
  • by Shadow of Eternity (795165) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:28AM (#30991864)

    No, the reason is because pretty much everyone else in the world has the sense to realise that bicyclists are pedestrians. They don't belong in the road any more than joggers or skateboarders.

    I was just in Helsinki last august, they just doubled the size of the sidewalk and allowed the section nearest the road for bicycles pretty much everywhere and where they don't they just treat a bicyclist that hits a walker the same as a car that hits a pedestrian.

  • by Animats (122034) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:45AM (#30991942) Homepage

    Trying to fit these things into traffic in a crowded area is tough. New York State classifies such vehicles as follows:

    • Motorized Scooters, Mini-Bikes, Dirt Bikes, Go-Karts, Motor Assisted Bicycles - not allowed on streets or highways.
    • Limited Use Motorcycle, class C (20 MPH or less) - allowed in right hand lane or shoulder only. Insurance not required, inspection not required, motorcycle driver license not required, helmet not required.
    • Limited Use Motorcycle, class B. (20MPH to 30 MPH) - allowed in right hand lane or shoulder only. Insurance required, inspection not required, motorcycle driver license not required. helmet required.
    • Limited Use Motorcycle, class A. (30MPH to 40 MPH) - allowed in any traffic lane. Insurance required, inspection required, motorcycle driver license required, helmet required.
    • Motorcycle. - allowed in any traffic lane and on freeways. Insurance required, inspection required, motorcycle driver license required, helmet required. Motorcycle Safety Foundation training recommended.

    So New York State makes a clear distinction between a bicycle and anything with power. (Segways are handled somewhat differently, but are limited to 12.5 MPH. New York City prohibits them on sidewalks.)

    Realistically, once you pass 20MPH, you have most of the risks of a motorcycle, and may as well get one.

  • by RoFLKOPTr (1294290) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:51AM (#30991962)

    One is drivers. I ride a (nonmotorized) bike to work twice a week. It would sure be nice if drivers here in the US showed that they had some clue that cyclists exist, etc.

    It would also be awesome if cyclists would show that they aren't oblivious to drivers. "Share The Road" goes both ways, bro.

  • by Beyond_GoodandEvil (769135) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:53AM (#30991970) Homepage
    My favorite kind of bicyclist are the ones who think stop signs don't apply to them. Yes, I'm talking to you Mr Lance Armstrong wannabe in your yellow jersey. The red octagon you shot past read stop and that meant you as well.
  • I did, didn't I? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SuperBanana (662181) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:55AM (#30991982)

    I'm glad you used sound reasoning and solid argumentation and did not resort to baser things like guilt-trips and emotional appeals. Well done, sir.

    Sure, because the parent I replied to had sound reasoning and solid argumentation when he said that most cyclists on the road are lawless jerks- and implied that they deserve what they get, or that drivers shouldn't be responsible for hitting them. Also, I think it's pretty logical and good reasoning to say, "When is the last time you read, 'motorist killed by cyclist'?"

    You know what? If reading that story and looking at that picture of that orphan makes a couple of Slashdotters a liiiiitle bit more careful driving (around cyclists or not), then it was worth every mod point.

    But yes, I see your point. Unfortunately, when you've been struck by cars twice (both breaking the law, when you were doing everything right), you tend to have a very shore fuse for the whole but-cyclists-are-lawless-idiots comment. Every time cyclist safety comes up in conversation someone has to blurt this out. While I was still in my cast from the first time I was hit, an asshole coworker sat across from me and told the table that cyclists knew that it was dangerous and thus drivers shouldn't be liable. I nearly cracked him over the head with the cast.

  • by brianosaurus (48471) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @01:56AM (#30991988) Homepage

    I have a "hybrid" electric bike. It has an electric motor in the hub, and regular pedals for the human powerplant. The motor works best as an assist, particularly nice on steep hills. I mainly use the electric motor to get up to speed, then can pedal to maintain. Using both at the same time gives a good quick launch from a standstill. The electric motor on mine tops out at about 15mph, which is decent. I can go faster on a normal bike, but I break a sweat. :)

  • by thesupraman (179040) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:00AM (#30992010)

    There are many cyclists who are capable of traveling at or above the urban speed limits, and around here do.
    Should they be banned from the bike lanes? what exactly is the bike lane speed limit?

    I would love to see what would happen if someone did try and enforce a nice and slow and safe limit on them, i bet a rather vocal group of riders would go nuts.

    Also, to address your other BS.

    Have you looked in the rear vision mirror of a parked car when bikes are coming past? they are VERY hard to spot, especially when going fast (as they often are), that is why riders must take care - I ride motorcycles, and we get the same problem, except hitting something much faster, attached to something much heavier, kills us more often... you know what we do? take care!

    And there is NO moped in the world that makes more pollution than an SUV, you are just showing everyone your own personal bias and one eyed view of transportation. Stop thinking you are so perfect and deal with the real world, as the rest of us do.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:23AM (#30992104)

    To add a sidecar, look for a remnant or broken bicycle that someone either discards or sells as parts. Best places are yard or garage sales, but you realy need to rummage through the dumpsters in a square mile area at-least once a week.

    Try to imagine the verticle pipe of the bicycle frame where the seat mounts into, you need to bend the two horizontal bars to a 90-degree angle or otherwise cut them off to re-weld them at a 90-degree angle. A disc cutter to cut the entire front frame off the rear-wheel would suffice if you have a choice of hardware to hobble it onto your bicycle. You can make a sidecar for someone to sit, or a basket, but the purpose is to just get a 3rd wheel on the ground so you CAN ride on snow without gravity sliding you on your chin and elbows.

    It's a shame that bicycle assemblers put so much crap along the wheels that limit what choice of wheels and traction to use. Bicycle Snow-chains need to be custom-made, and that's why you need to use disk-brakes rather than the cruddy ones they weld onto the forks. Goal is to replace brake calipers on the rims to disc brakes on the wheel axles, and consider quick-release rims because only cheap-bastard assemblers use anything that needs a wrench to remove.

  • fule cost are why (Score:2, Interesting)

    by luther349 (645380) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:40AM (#30992180)
    lets face it fuel cost are a joke these days. i even have looked into a electric moped the model i am looking at goes 60 and has a 85 mile range all battery powered. a street legile model in other words. most of your driving is to work or around town and that little moped would fufill my needs for almost all my driving.and i live in a state that mostly warm year round. my fule burning car would only be driving on long trips or on the freeway being i woudlent dare take anything that small and noiseless on a freeway even thow its legile to do so. i also see alot more gas powerd ones running around hear more and more every year they get crazy mpg abought the same as the eltric model i am looking at but with fuel of course. why pay crazy fule price whatever amount they dedcide to gourge on this year when for a cuple grand you can get a small ultra efficient means to get around..fuled or otherwise. nut any kind of bike has its risk on the road drivers just dont respect bikes at all in the usa why thers so many accidents on them.. .
  • by shutdown -p now (807394) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:48AM (#30992208) Journal

    The problem is that when drivers ignore the traffic laws around cyclists, it's a threat to the cyclist's life.

    The problem is that when cyclists ignore traffic laws around cars, it's also a threat to cyclist's life.

  • by Brett Buck (811747) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:57AM (#30992250)

    In more friendly jurisdictions a car/bike collision automatically means that the car driver is at fault unless it can be proven otherwise. And if you think about it, that really makes sense.

              So you punish people based on no evidence? Interesting law.

              Brett

  • Typical demographic (Score:2, Interesting)

    by acey72 (716552) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @03:00AM (#30992264)
    You see plenty of them here in Cambridge, UK, but they generally tend to be ridden by the sort of people who would really benefit from having to pedal their bikes...
  • by wiredlogic (135348) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @03:11AM (#30992296)

    pretty much everyone else in the world has the sense to realise that bicyclists are pedestrians. They don't belong in the road any more than joggers or skateboarders.

    I don't suppose you've ever ridden down a sidewalk at 30mph? How about trying to avoid getting hit by cars pulling in and out of driveways while riding down a sidewalk at 30mph? Nobody expects fast moving vehicles on a sidewalk and they are a hazard to any cyclist capable of maintaining high speed. The widespread development of smooth paved roads was initially done at the behest of cyclists 100+ years ago who wanted a better surface to ride on than dirt or gravel. Now all of a sudden the automobile comes along and we can't use the roads originally made for us. That's very fair.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 02 2010, @03:22AM (#30992336)

    You know here in Norway a lot of people cycle in the winter. Studded winter tires on a bike makes breaking on ice almost as easy as on a dry road. But at -18C i feel it is too cold to take the bike to work even if they have showers and a sauna there.

  • by canadian_in_beijing (1234768) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @04:02AM (#30992496) Homepage
    First of all, bikes in China are not produced to western standards either technically (safety standards: saw one blow up in flames while parked), fashionably (clunky, heavy, etc) or socially acceptable. Majority of consumers in the US ride bikes for leisure purposes. Some take the stand of being environmentally friendly or dissing long commute times, but basically it's for an image. Biking around with 20+kg of weight is neither comfortable or convenient. Exercise = pedaling and consumers pay for light weight bikes, not heavy electric bikes. When you turn on an electric motor the majority would rather hop in a car with air con/heater/stereo/etc. Then you start to get into infrastructure... originally Beijing was built around 90% bikes and 10% cars, people grew up accepting bikes as the main mode of transportation and this gradually progressed into todays ring road system (huge nightmare with the on/off ramps... other story)... the US grew up the other way with cars being the main method of transportation. On top of that you have the US desire for instant gratification... time = money. In terms of cars vs bikes... cars will always win with consumers focused on faster commute times with less energy. Those that don't see this are in the minority. When gas triples in price this might be another story... but by then cars will likely be electric anyway. I can see some Europeans buying into electric bikes due to the city infrastructure but Americans are built around highways and cars... good luck changing this except in very select high density areas.
  • by trawg (308495) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @04:21AM (#30992576) Homepage

    There's this one road I go down -- 30kph speed limit, and yet every car behind me always seems to catch up and pass me rather quickly when I'm going along at 30kph. In fact, I would say that most are going 50kph. That's more than 66% over the speed limit.

    My brother is a cycler and comes home regularly with tales that make me cringe for his safety.

    I've often wondered if he had an LED display on the back of his bike that showed how fast he was riding, if cars would be more prone to backing off. He is like you sound - regularly doing the speed limit - and is overtaken a lot, I assume because people think "well, bikes are slow, so I can drive faster".

  • by hack slash (1064002) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @08:22AM (#30993676)

    The electric motor on mine tops out at about 15mph,

    The throttle control on my 3 year old Urban Mover UM36 is now derestricted, normally the throttle maxes out at 10mph and the pedal sensor maxes out at 15mph, but now the throttle can get me to 20mph along the flat without pedalling (and no panniers), faster if I pedal whilst the throttle is on maximum.
    Sure it's illegal here in the UK but it's so much fun and journeys are shorter than before, took a short while to get used to the increased speed but I'm still safe with it, I make sure I don't ride dangerously because I don't want to get hurt or hurt others.

  • Better planning (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 02 2010, @10:03AM (#30994516)

    I like to ride my bike to work. It is about 40 minutes each way. Nice an calm except that 15 minutes of terror while I have to cross the freeway (zero way around) and then safely navigate through 20 square block where the cops fear to even go. No matter how I cut it I must cross at least one freeway (takes about 5 minutes) and if I want to avoid the nasty neighborhood then I must cross two freeways (and travel down the second one for about 5 minutes). The safer route actually adds about 40 extra minutes to my 40 minute route.

    This could be solved if the city built a bike path or even a traversalable path along the stream that snakes from near my home to near my work (down town). The city council does not really encourage alternative solutions – the current ‘bike’ paths are rough are composed of a lose gravel/sand mix. Part of the city council’s reasoning: it keeps those darn roller blading kids off their ‘walking’ paths.

    The last city I lived in I could roller blade or bike to pretty much every corner of the city. I hardly ever need to use my car. It was great.

  • Re:I don't get... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by serialband (447336) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @10:56AM (#30995218)

    You are one of the few who obey the rules on a bicycle. I also obey all the rules of the road when I bicycle, but an overwhelming majority don't. I come to full and complete stops at red lights, behind the crosswalk or limit lines. I don't go unless the light is green. I stop at all stop signs. I'll hop off my bike and walk it across a crosswalk on busy intersections. Others just zip through traffic, ignore stop signs and red lights. They zip around pedestrians in the crosswalk and won't bother to stop for others. They just won't give up any right of way. It's the entire reason why bicyclists are hated. Because of this, many drivers don't know exactly how to behave around bicyclists because too many bicyclists do unexpected things and expect others to read their minds. That's where the animosity comes from.

    Part of the problem is that there aren't enough regular people who bicycle in the USA. Too many are just weekend warriors or just adrenaline junkies. Many of them don't know that bicycles are considered vehicles and must follow the same rules of the road as a car. Too many think that they're pedestrians when they bicycle. Some drivers even come to full and complete stops for bicyclists as if the were pedestrians. The weekend warriors aren't out everyday and don't realize that they need to courteous to other traffic. The adrenaline junkies just ride for the thrill and do dangerous things. The standard rules of the road are ignored. This may explain why there are many more accidents in the USA.

  • by Jhon (241832) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @11:11AM (#30995474) Homepage Journal

    I used to bike to work before my employer was bought out by %HUGECORPAGENCY%. The new bosses require me be available to travel within a range of 200 miles on a moments notice -- so I'm stuck.

    I also have an electric bike. It's a hybrid. You can't just push a button and go. It requires you peddle -- and it will assist you. I like this because it makes the hills and inclines much easier to manage and I didn't show up to work smelly and sweaty. On the ride home, I'd generally ride with the motor off to get a workout.

    Right now, except for the occasional weekend, this bike sits in my garage collecting dust.

  • by mdarksbane (587589) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @11:15AM (#30995512)

    Honestly, I feel the same way driving a coupe. If an SUV or a tractor trailer decides to pull into my lane without checking their blind spot, I'm toast. I've ended up literally with parts of a semi trailer *over* the front of my car before.

    The best way to view this is that there is always someone else on the road who is going to do something stupid, and even if one of you end up worse for the encounter... it's still a really bad situation to be in knowing that you killed someone's mom through your negligence, or having to pay thousands of dollars in a settlement. One either side of the debate, you can't control the other idiots on the road. You can control yourself. Stay out of people blind spots, watch for doors opening and people pulling out of driveways, pull to the edge of the road as a slow vehicle or bike to let people pass... there are a lot of things people can do to make themselves safer without bitching about everyone driving around them.

  • Re:*cycle (Score:3, Interesting)

    by amorsen (7485) <benny+slashdot@amorsen.dk> on Tuesday February 02 2010, @11:15AM (#30995516)

    They are generally just electrically assisted bicycles. Around here they are limited so that the electric motor adds less power at higher speeds and shuts off completely at 25kph. They are allowed in bicycle lanes and have almost the same handling characteristics and looks as regular bicycles, and you can drive them without needing a license.

  • by ianezz (31449) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @11:36AM (#30995912) Homepage

    There are other problems. Pedaling 20 miles to work = working with really stinky people

    Where I live (northern Italy), we are trying to solve this problem with local trains carrying people and their bikes, and with bicycle parking racks near stations. This way, most part of the travel can be done on public transport, and the last 2-3 miles can be done on bikes. It is less clumsy than it sounds.

  • by Lumpy (12016) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:10PM (#30996542) Homepage

    switch to a "ride flat" inntertube. It's a very stiff thick rubber innertube. you can still pump it up to 80psi, but if it get's a flat, you can still ride home safely, just extra work riding a tire at a 50-60 psi squishyness.

    I use them on every bike now, got tired of patching a tube on the side of the road.

  • Two Sides (Score:3, Interesting)

    by lymond01 (314120) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @12:23PM (#30996766)

    At first I get sad thinking of younger folk using electric bikes. But there is a practical side and that is, as many have mentioned, replacing the car for commuting. If an electric bike can keep up a 15 MPH run (much faster and I wouldn't want it sharing bike paths with pedestrians and strollers), you could use it for the 5-20 mile commutes to work. I've been starting to realize just how completely absurd it is that we feel the need for 3000+ lbs of metal to cart us around. Even motorcycles are kind of ridiculous. But an electric bike that allows you to both pedal and ride...that's a decent idea.

    I've got a 20 mile commute which is easy by highway, but hilly and 25 miles on a bike. I'd consider it with an electric bike though. But I'd consider it on a normal bike if I could get a bike path the whole way instead of sharing/dodging cars on the road.

  • Re:pollution (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Khashishi (775369) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:11PM (#30998684) Journal

    Better than cars, which use lead-acid batteries as well.

  • by gwolf (26339) <<gro.flowg> <ta> <flowg>> on Tuesday February 02 2010, @02:25PM (#30998888) Homepage

    Your assertion might be right if you don't live in a major city. I live in Mexico City, which is a huge monster by all standards. The most efficient transportation medium here is by bike, unless you are lucky enough to ride on the major high-speed urban roads on your way to work, and both live and work quite close to their entry/exit points.

    I am by no means an athlete. My average cycling speed is between 20 and 25 Km/h. The city is mostly flat, and whenever I can, I bike to my destination on a ~20Km radius from home. My trips are usually way faster than when I go by car, and slightly faster than when I go by subway. And as there are no major hills on the road, it is not enough effort to make me a sweaty mess.

    Yes, my workplace is where the hilly part starts, and I do arrive somewhat sweaty ;-) But not enough to be stinky. Or at least, so I believe ;-)

  • by dr2chase (653338) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @03:08PM (#30999560) Homepage
    New Orleans (well, most of the Gulf Coast) is a special case -- except that this might motivate e-bikes, which as I recall was once being discussed here :-). No e-assist, showers are really not optional there, at least in the summer. They are optional here (near Boston) for most of the year, but they are also available. I did commute by bike, a short distance, in Houston, one extremely hot summer. Leave early, come home late, minimum effort, steer for puddles of shade. And I've also spent years aiming for a job were being a snappy dresser was not the most important qualification. (And, to be blunt, where the rational analysis that says "50 miles of biking per week is the most time-effective way to get the exercise I need to stay healthy, plus a lot of other good things" is valued.)

    As for "chicks"-and-or-coeds, I am nearly 50. And happily married. We're talking purely Walter Mitty territory here.

    You really can carry plenty on a bicycle, depending on the bicycle. I got a cargo bike because I was tired of backpacks and panniers. 50lbs of stuff, I can still ride no-hands (summer tires, at least). 100lbs, I am still comfortable on the bike. 150+, I have to pay attention to the handling. 200 is the official limit, but people have carried more. I've hauled my wife a short distance, in the snow (storm), when it was easier than shoveling out the berm that had been plowed up behind the car. I've also arranged the bike so that I don't need to ride in fancy clothes, or even with pants clips -- nice saddle, chain case, when the weather's right I ride in work clothes, and I've even used a bike to get to a quite-fancy dinner in quite nice clothes.
  • Re:pollution (Score:4, Interesting)

    by cduffy (652) <charles+slashdot@dyfis.net> on Tuesday February 02 2010, @05:58PM (#31001764)

    Seems like a relatively minor thing to be worrying about; as e-bikes are such lightweight and efficient vehicles, an indirectly coal-powered e-bike is vastly lower-impact than almost any other motor vehicle on the road. Yes, the electricity comes from an ugly source -- but so little is used that mile-for-mile they're still a net win over most of the alternatives.

    Do all the e-bikes in China add up to be resulting in significant smokestack pollution? Of course -- but that pollution would be far worse if other forms of motorized transport were being used instead.

  • by Beerdood (1451859) on Tuesday February 02 2010, @06:31PM (#31002130)

    Bikes are already banned from the sidewalks in many places, which makes absolutely no sense...

    Ever try riding a bike downtown on a sidewalk during business hours? Constantly weaving through dozens of people each minute won't allow you to reach a very high speed, and you run a much higher risk of crashing into someone, as pedestrian movements can be a lot more random and sporadic (i.e. riding behind someone that just stops and turns around, people suddenly exiting parked cars or buildings) than cars, which generally travel in their lanes.

    I'd prefer to ride on a sidewalk as much as possible, as getting run over by a pedestrian is a lot less worse for me than getting run over by a vehicle (paying extra attention to right turns and left turning vehicles when crossing intersections). Riding on the road when the sidewalk is empty seems like a needless risk too. Sidewalk-only riding simply doesn't work everywhere, and I'll need to ride on the road sometimes to get to my destination in the fastest possible time.

I know you're in search of yourself, I just haven't seen you anywhere.

Working...