Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Google Power IT

Google Explains Why It Became an Energy Trader 112

angry tapir writes "Google has explained how it might use its status as an energy-trading company to increase the use of renewable energy sources in its data centers. In February, the company's Google Energy subsidiary received approval from the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to buy and sell power on the wholesale market."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Explains Why It Became an Energy Trader

Comments Filter:
  • by eln ( 21727 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @01:06PM (#32074232)
    Plus, Google has always been about doing what other companies have done before, only bigger and better. Enron used shady energy trading practices to cause rolling blackouts in California. Google will improve on this process to cause rolling blackouts nationwide.
  • by Monkeedude1212 ( 1560403 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @01:17PM (#32074382) Journal

    Actually, Google plans to cause rolling blackouts globally, in an energy scheme they are calling "Night and Day".

  • by KahabutDieDrake ( 1515139 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @01:22PM (#32074426)
    "often producing more electricity than they use"

    Guys, seriously? Welcome to hyperbole 104. We will teach you to exaggerate in ways that are believable, but still carry impact. For instance, in the example, we see someone clearly talking out their ass. This speaker has forgotten that this is a techie site, and that thermodynamics isn't negotiable. We might say instead, "often generating significant portions of the original energy input". Now, we might also want to give it a bit more kick. So we could say "often generating huge amounts of power" This of course ignores the fact that it takes absolutely massive amounts of power in the first place, but what the read doesn't know, won't cause them to think you are a moron.
  • by Chris Burke ( 6130 ) on Monday May 03, 2010 @07:45PM (#32079460) Homepage

    Ooh, Greenpeace Mad-Libs! I love it!

    "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly ONE NUCLEAR DISASTER!"

    Hmm, not Armaggeddonist-y enough. Ah, here we go.

    "In the twenty years since the Chernobyl tragedy, the world's worst nuclear accident, there have been nearly FIFTY RECORDED TYPE 1-A SUPERNOVAE, WHICH IS A FUSION REACTOR EXPLODING WITH THE POWER OF A STAR EXPLODING!"

    Still think nuclear power is safe? Huh?!

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...