Microsoft To Pay $200M In Patent Dispute 81
Pickens writes "eWeek reports that Microsoft has announced it will pay $200 million to settle a patent-infringement suit against it by VirnetX, which alleged that the software giant infringed on its patents related to communications, virtualization and collaboration technology. This payment represents a substantial markup from the $105.7 million that a Texas jury awarded in March when it found that Microsoft had infringed on two US patents held by VirnetX. Microsoft will license VirnetX technology for its own products. 'We believe that this successful resolution of our litigation with Microsoft will allow us to focus on the upcoming pilot system that will showcase VirnetX's automatic Virtual Private Network technology,' says Kendall Larsen, VirnetX Holding Corp.'s CEO. East Texas courts have a reputation as a good place to pursue intellectual property suits against larger corporations. While many of these cases seem to be settled out of court — or dismissed as totally frivolous — recent lawsuits such as those leveled by i4i and VirnetX are notable for at least extending to the Big Judgment phase."
Clarification (Score:5, Informative)
East Texas (Score:3, Informative)
East Texas courts have a reputation as a good place to pursue intellectual property suits against larger corporations
It is not actually that good. [patentlyo.com]
See also this comment [slashdot.org] on a previous story.
Re:Awww what a shame (Score:3, Informative)
They patent everything because the system requires them to.
The "system requires them to" part is true, but, nonetheless, Microsoft (together with many other large corps) has filed several amicus curiae briefs in support of software patents in relevant court cases in U.S.
Re:The bigger you are (Score:4, Informative)
Re:The bigger you are (Score:2, Informative)