Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

Gulf Oil Spill Nearing Loop Current 334

An anonymous reader writes "Per The Weather Channel's tropical expert Dr. Richard Knabb, 'based on satellite images, model simulations, and on-site research vessel reports, I think it is reasonable to conclude that the oil slick at the surface is very near or partially in the Loop Current. The Loop Current is responsible in the first place for extending that stream of oil off to the southeast in satellite imagery. With its proximity to the northern edge of the Loop Current it may be only a matter of weeks or even days before the ocean surface oil is transported toward the Florida Keys and southeast Florida.'" Other experts are a little more cautious: "We know the oil has not entered the Loop Current," Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry said at a news conference Monday afternoon. "A leading edge sheen is getting close to it, but it has not entered the Loop Current. The larger volume of oil is several miles from the Loop Current."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gulf Oil Spill Nearing Loop Current

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Nuke it. (Score:3, Funny)

    by Thanshin ( 1188877 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:31AM (#32251330)

    What happens when you hit underwater sea life with a nuke?

    The same thing that happens to anything else.

    And we don't want green, muscular, lobsters?

  • Re:Nuke it. (Score:5, Funny)

    by solevita ( 967690 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:34AM (#32251358)

    What happens when you hit underwater sea life with a nuke?

    The same thing that happens to anything else.

    Ill-tempered mutated sea bass?

  • by dpbsmith ( 263124 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:37AM (#32251392) Homepage

    The press is focussing too much on the "what if" and not the "what is."

    First of all, how do we even know that the oil is harmful? There haven't been any long-term scientific studies on oil spills of this much oil of this kind. Why, for all we know, it might be beneficial! We shouldn't rush to judgement until this has been properly studied.

    Second, let's stop using loaded terms like "pollution." Economists say we should measure the value of something by what people are willing to pay for it. Oil is worth $72 a barrel. The price of enough Instant Ocean to mix up a barrel of seawater is $8.72. So let's stop talking about oil as "polluting" seawater, let's be rational and unemotional and say that the oil is "enriching" the seawater.

    Third, hasn't it occurred to anyone that this oil might prevent the harmful sea surges that did so much damage to New Orleans during the Katrina disaster? Let's stop berating BP when all they're really doing is pouring oil on the troubled waters.

  • Re:Nuke it. (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:38AM (#32251398)

    There is no oxygen under water

    Remind me, in H2O, what does the O stand for again? Oil?

  • Re:Nuke it. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Goaway ( 82658 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:47AM (#32251480) Homepage

    This is why fire departments warn you to never, ever put water on a fire.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @08:58AM (#32251576)

    I think this story is a little old now

    This. We real Linux geeks have been using tarballs since the 70s and BP comes along does it on a massive and claims it as something new. I'm sure they've even gone out and gotten patents on it (just because you add "in the water" doesn't make it patentable, goddammit!). I bet M$ put them up to it, the bastards.

  • by Rogerborg ( 306625 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @09:00AM (#32251606) Homepage

    Yup, I read that discussion with interest. Apparently the "tarballs" are actually globs of nano-sized Black Helicopters created under the Majestic-12 program at Area 51 by Haliburton on orders from the Tea Party and their New World Order masters, the Lizard Man Kings of the Houses of Saud and Bush.

    Admittedly I kind of skimmed the comments, and in fact I wasn't sure that was the tarballs article - it could have been any DailyKos story.

  • by fuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @09:14AM (#32251740) Journal
    Those guys are morons.

    Everybody knows that Haliburton's patented petro-evil technology is the best in the business for artificially triggering earthquakes near impoverished nations as a pretext for the militarized export of neoliberal capitalism; but if you want nano-sized Black Helicopters, you need the nanotech that SAIC acquired when the reverse-engineered the Roswell Grey artefacts under contract from the Rand corporation...
  • by fuzzyfuzzyfungus ( 1223518 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @09:16AM (#32251760) Journal
    On the plus side, with recent advances in DNA computing, we should just be able to introduce bzip2-capable e. coli into the environment, which will shrink the tarballs to a more manageable size in no time...
  • Re:Nuke it. (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @09:16AM (#32251776)

    Furthermore, AFAIK, the effects of a nuclear bomb on underwater sea life are basically unknown.

    Not so. [wikipedia.org]

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @10:30AM (#32252610)

    Maybe if they untar them they'll get a hint as to what caused them.

    tar -xvf floridabeach.tar

    They might find a README.TXT or a LICENSE.TXT that will explain what it's all about.

    As this is a computer site, I think I have the correct meaning of 'tar' here.

  • by ColdWetDog ( 752185 ) on Tuesday May 18, 2010 @11:07AM (#32253052) Homepage

    I think it's safe to say the tar balls that have reached the Keys are from the BP Oil Spill.

    Dunno about that. Looks more like somebody has lost their backups again.

    Hope they're encrypted.

With your bare hands?!?

Working...