Firefox May Soon Overtake IE In Europe 290
Posted
by
kdawson
from the pick-your-stats dept.
from the pick-your-stats dept.
peterkern writes "The July browser market share reports are somewhat inconsistent, but if we believe StatCounter, then it looks like Firefox will be overtaking Microsoft IE's market share next month. The two browsers are both within 1 point of 40% market share, IE above and Firefox below. Europeans are more crazy about Firefox than Americans: In Germany, Firefox has a 61% market share, while IE has only 25%. Google Chrome is, according to StatCounter, now above 10%. ConceivablyTech has more details, including market share data from both StatCounter and Net Applications (which as of this month is limiting its free data)."
Re:opera for the win (Score:2, Funny)
I use opera instead. I find IE just as much security issue prone as IE.
To offer a counter argument, from my personal experience I've found Opera to be as much of a security issue as Opera.
Re:Browser market share (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Browser market share (Score:5, Funny)
Oh grasshopper, allow your old and wise pal Hairyfeet to explain the ways that led to the garden of evil.
You see young one, once upon a time there was this thing called ActiveX. And in this naive and innocent time, when the web was young and the word bukkake was unknown in the west, the developers at Redmond pushed ActiveX as "everything you ever wanted...in a box!" it could build Rich Internet Apps, and turn even the hardest job into a simple form even sally in the typing pool could do. And even trained monkeys could write for ActiveX! And you know what? It was true! Oh how young and foolish everyone was! Every PHB on the block joined right in, and all thought it was well.
Unfortunately there was a REASON why ActiveX was so damned easy, and that was because it blew a hole right through the OS the size of a Peterbuilt. It turned out that trained monkeys also existed in China and Russia, and thanks to security not being taught the day the ActiveX guys were at school it quickly turned craptastic. MSFT, after getting laughed at and having rotten fruit thrown at them wisely treated ActiveX like the red headed stepchild and tried to quietly bash its brains out and bury it in the backyard. Sadly waaaay too many PHBs had bought into ActiveX Intranet apps, and found out that IE 6= works, and IE anything else =toast. But PHBs, being a rather stupid lot, decided that rather than spend the money to rewrite their Intranet would simply keep IE 6 4EVAR BWA HA HA HA HA!
So there you have it my son, the reason why a crappy browser nobody really liked is still used day, after day, after day, after day. It is because PHBs are stupid, more crappy Intranet ActiveX sites exist than you'd care to know (I even know of a few that still use IE 6 ActiveX based sites for processing CC info of their customers EEEK!) and until XP is quietly pushed out on that iceflow to die IE 6 will continue to slowly lumber on.
Re:Browser market share (Score:3, Funny)
Because my dog just had surgery (which included a hysterectomy, an RFID cyber-implant, and 4 baby teeth pulled) for a total cost of $200. That is what health care costs (with a reasonable markup to cover overhead and profit). With humans, I understand if people want to include some additional safeguards, so maybe multiply that cost by n (where I'm thinking of a number like two or three, not a hundred!), and that tells you the potential that a free market has to offer the problem of health care.
Likewise, I can look at the cost of a hotel room in a free market ($50-$200; I know this varies wildly depending on where it is) plus the cost of a well-trained expert (say $75/hour, except amortized across several customers, just like doctors and nurses work in real life) and that tells you what a hospital room can cost.
When you think about these numbers and compare them to what we currently pay, I wonder how people can not desperately want a free market.
You know what? I'll concede that; free markets aren't perfect. But can a market planned by government (i.e. lobbyists) have so little distortion?
Why are people upholding US health care as some kind of example of free markets? If the US had a free market for health care, we would all be bitching about how Wal-Mart surgeons are squeezing the mom'n'pops out of business. Doctors would be complaining that it's hard to repay their student loans on their $20/hour job, yet not quite impossible since, after all, the student loan is only for about $5000 * years_in_school.
Re:Browser market share (Score:3, Funny)
"I was really hoping for an analogy using the metric system."
I, on the other hand, was hoping for a car analogy.