Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth Medicine NASA Science

NASA Data Reveals China's Industrial Air Pollution 133

eldavojohn writes "China's skyrocketing industrialism comes at a price to the environment, according to Canadian scientists who used NASA data to publish a report on worldwide air pollution (PDF) in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. The biggest problem appears to be a bright red mass in Northeastern China around the Yangtze River Delta — a rapidly developing piece of China's explosive economy. There doesn't seem to be a lot of acknowledgment from the state media, but blogs are picking it up as one of the few sources of data on air pollution for the area. The sad fact is that particulate matter in the air less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter is not classified as pollution by the Chinese government, so they have no official measurements to provide. If you're in Shanghai and looking for a breath of fresh air, you've got quite the journey ahead of you."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NASA Data Reveals China's Industrial Air Pollution

Comments Filter:
  • Race to the Bottom (Score:3, Interesting)

    by El Torico ( 732160 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @06:48PM (#33717412)

    This is more evidence supporting the "Race to the Bottom" argument. China isn't known for environmental protections.
    By the way, on the diagram, the northwestern region showing elevated levels is the Gobi desert, but that isn't where the highest levels are.

  • by jpapon ( 1877296 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @06:59PM (#33717514) Journal
    Did you RTFA?

    They're talking about PM2.5 - the really small particles, which apparently China doesn't classify as pollution (they're not listed on that site).

    Apparently the really fine particles can be the worst for you, since your body has a hard time filtering them out.

  • Bad calibration? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by scdeimos ( 632778 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @07:11PM (#33717608)
    It's interesting to see that in Australia the highest concentrations of particulate matter are in the desert where nobody lives as opposed to the eastern coastline where the majority of industry is. This makes me a little suspicious of the low-end of the scale, but it could be due to airborne particulates from soil erosion.
  • by gregrah ( 1605707 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @07:13PM (#33717632)
    While it doesn't exactly refute your argument, I do think that it's important to point out that China, the world's biggest polluter, is also the world's largest producer of solar panels (see Suntech [technologyreview.com]). So while China's cheap labor costs and lax environmental policies are certainly helping to push the world toward the brink of destruction via global warming, they are also working toward a solution by making solar power prices more competitive with traditional forms of energy.

    I do agree completely after watching the recent (and ongoing) conflict between China and Japan that the US seriously needs to take measures to be less reliant on China for.. well.. everything.
  • Particulate Map (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 27, 2010 @07:43PM (#33717864)

    Remember People.

    This is a particulate map. Not a noxious gas map.

    The reason for the apparent high levels of pollution over the desert regions is due to dust from well, the deserts.

    This doesn't mean China gets a break on this one tho since China isn't an arid region and they don't have the deserts to blame the particulate levels on.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 27, 2010 @07:53PM (#33717946)

    Recently a Chinese delegation visited one of Australia's woolgrowing areas. At the end of an interview conducted by ABC Radio the interviewer asked, "What most excites you about this trip?" The reply was, "The fresh air." If you're interested you can download the four minute interview as an MP3 from http://www.abc.net.au/rural/content/2010/s3017529.htm [abc.net.au] (see the sidebar).

  • Here's why: (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Penguinisto ( 415985 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @07:59PM (#33717996) Journal

    The only reason China is cranking out solar panels like there's no tomorrow? The answer is two-fold:
    1) there was a HUGE and growing global market for them starting in 2007-2008 (when many of these solar companies were founded/bolstered) and
    2) the Chinese government is subsidizing the unholy hell out of these companies at the same time, so as to under-cut international pricing.

    Taken together, the overall plan (and reason for the subsidies) involves cornering the market on mass-produced 'green energy' goods. Notice that they're also pushing like mad to become the top wind-turbine manufacturer [windfair.net] as well.

    Long-term, its a smart strategy - when the industrialized world finds oil too pricey, guess who will be around selling them cheap and plentiful solar panels, wind turbines, etc? Meanwhile, the company owners are still making money like mad thanks to the subsidies.

  • by steelfood ( 895457 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @08:00PM (#33717998)

    My dollar is on them starting to enforce environmental controls once their economy has become self-sustaining. Their long-term strategy is to rapidly industrialize now to raise the general standard of living to be on par with or even surpass first-world countries, and figure out what to do with the nasty side effects afterwards.

    As far as the government's concerned, losing a few million or a few hundred million people to those side effects is just an added population control bonus. As long as nobody's too worked up about it, they'll continue as they were. The populace is both kept ignorant of the issues by the government, and too busy making money to care. By the time the populace does get around to caring, that in and of itself is the signal for when the government won't need to push for growth and can start pushing for stronger environmental (and other types) of control.

    The one thnig which makes this an actually feasible long-term plan, unlike the idea of deficit spending in the 30's, is that the Chinese government is totalitarian, which means it is actually able to turn on a dime. So while in a democracy, it might take fifty years to go from a fossil-fuel-based economy to entirely renewable-energy-based, it'll take China five, perhaps even less.

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @09:14PM (#33718572)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by MaWeiTao ( 908546 ) on Monday September 27, 2010 @10:04PM (#33718838)

    It could have been dust storms. Eastern China suffers some pretty bad dust storms from sand blown out of the Gobi desert and it gets as far as Japan sometimes.

  • Re:Here's why: (Score:4, Interesting)

    by TapeCutter ( 624760 ) * on Monday September 27, 2010 @11:35PM (#33719322) Journal
    The three gorges dam project was threatened by silt run off from the loess plateau. Over the last 15yrs and for the paultry price of $500M they have transformed an area the size of France from a 1000yo man-made desert that was only fit for goat hearding into forests, orchards and terraced farms. The area is now one of the largest producers of apples in the world. The impact on the locals has been dramatic, they have become well fed peasant farmers who own their orchards and run their own markets as opposed to starving peasants living in caves and hearding goats on public land.

    So yeah, China (and the world bank) do some increadibly evil shit but they also do some increadibly inspiring shit too.

Serving coffee on aircraft causes turbulence.

Working...