YouTube Legally Considered a TV Station In Italy 254
orzetto writes "Italian newspaper La Repubblica reports that YouTube and similar websites based on user-generated content will be considered TV stations (Google translation of Italian original) in Italian law, and will be subject to the same obligations. Among these, a small tax (500 €), the obligation to publish corrections within 48 hours upon request of people who consider themselves slandered by published content, and the obligation not to broadcast content inappropriate for children in certain time slots. The main change, though, is that YouTube and similar sites will be legally responsible for all published content as long as they have any form (even if automated) of editorial control. The main reason for this is probably that it will force YouTube to assume editorial responsibility for all published content, which facilitates the ongoing € 500M lawsuit of Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi against YouTube because of content copyrighted by Berlusconi's TV networks that some users uploaded on YouTube. Berlusconi's Spanish TV station, TeleCinco, was previously defeated in court on the grounds that YouTube is not a content provider."
Pretty much completely infeasible. (Score:5, Insightful)
Wow (Score:3, Insightful)
the obligation not to broadcast content inappropriate for children in certain time slots
Given the nature of the internet being worldwide, that would be.... never.
But seriously, how do they expect to enforce this??
Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. (Score:5, Insightful)
Do you really think this isn't the intended result of this law? Silvio "Mr. Corruption" Berlusconi owns most major TV stations in Italy. He's in the perfect position to get rid of competition.
This is what happens... (Score:5, Insightful)
This is what happens when the leader of a country also controls the largest media conglomerate of that country. Control the media, and you control the people. Control the people, and you *keep* control of the media.
Re:Wow (Score:3, Insightful)
Not a problem. YouTube doesn't "broadcast".
They're not a TV station either, but that doesn't seem to have registered with them either.
Re:Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. (Score:4, Insightful)
Here's to hoping!
Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. (Score:4, Insightful)
I never understood how governments allow such conflict of interest... if you're a politician, your job is politics. Owning companies should make you ineligible to work in politics in the first place, or there should at least be requirements to occupy a function that's completely unrelated to the companies you own.
Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. (Score:4, Insightful)
And any italian citizen sending a message to Berlusconi will get a "visit in the night" just like any other Berlusconi opposers receive.
Re:Call it (Score:5, Insightful)
So what you are saying is that Google now has the power to bring down a democratically elected government?
No, he's saying its people do. And this is how it's supposed to be.
Re:Call it (Score:4, Insightful)
No, that's what Silvio wants them to do. His goal is to eliminate major public venues in Italy that can be critical of him, he does most of that by owning the mass media, but he doesn't (and probably can't) buy Google. So if nobody in Italy can access Youtube, from Berlusconi's point of view the problem is solved.
Re:Call it (Score:4, Insightful)
Maga-corporations have nearly as much power as governments. Fortunately, Google seems to be one of the "good guys", for a slightly looser definition of "good" than I prefer.
Re:Take that Italy (Score:5, Insightful)
If YouTube is an Italian TV Station, where are the breasts?
David Eddings suggested this. (Score:2, Insightful)
David Eddings suggested the ultimate version of this in the Tamuli series in the Second Chapter of 'The Shining Ones'
On the Tegan government:
'Our elected officials have no outside interests. As soon as they're elected, everything they own is sold, and the money's put into the national treasury. If the economy prospers during their term in office, their wealth earns them a profit. If the economy collapses, they lose everything'
'That's absurd. No government ever makes a profit.
'Ours does,' she said smugly, 'and it has to be a real profit. The tax rates are set and cannot be changed, so our officials can't generate a false profit by simply raising taxes.'
'Why would anyone want to be an official in a government like that?'
'Nobody wants to be, Prince Sparhawk. Most Tegans do everything they possibly can to avoid election. The fact that a man's own personal fortune's in the treasury forces him to work just as hard as he possibly can to make sure that the government prospers. Many have worked themselves to death looking after
the interests of the Republic.'