Investigating the Performance of Firefox 4 and IE9 105
theweatherelectric writes "Mozilla's Robert O'Callahan has investigated the performance differences between Firefox 4 and IE9. He writes, 'As I explained in my last post, Microsoft's PR about "full hardware acceleration" is a myth. But it's true that some graphics benchmarks consistently report better scores for IE9 than for Firefox, so over the last few days I've been looking into that. Below I'll explain the details [of] what I've found about various commonly-cited benchmarks, but the summary is that the performance differences are explained by relatively small bugs in Firefox, bugs in IE9, and bugs in the benchmarks, not due to any major architectural issues in Firefox (as Microsoft would have you believe).'"
Re:Firefox 4 (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Firefox 4 (Score:3, Informative)
Google are rubbish at responding to bugs. If they respond at all, it's often a joke.
I'm not using Chrome until there's a menu item for bookmarks. I'm not giving up a whole row just to get to the bookmark button.
Re:MS Firefox FUD? (Score:5, Informative)
> Joking aside, I am kind of curious what thuis "as microsoft would have you beiieve" comment is coming from.
This blog post [msdn.com], which was linked to in the article. Especially the last section ("Full Hardware Acceleration is the Difference") would lead the reader to believe that the difference was architectural.
Re:IE9: Readable fonts Firefox 4: Blur (Score:5, Informative)
Re:So... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wow... (Score:2, Informative)