Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Japan The Almighty Buck Wireless Networking Your Rights Online

Carriers Delay Paying Japan's Texting Donations 235

Julie188 writes "As the fallout from the Japanese earthquake/tsunami/nuclear meltdown tragedy continues to unfold, Americans want to help. We learned from the Haiti disaster that the easiest thing to do is to text a donation to our favorite relief organization. But, unlike Haiti, Japan's text-to-give donations will take as long as three months to get to the relief agency. And the company handling these donations, mGive.com, has not waived the transaction fees it charges relief agencies."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Carriers Delay Paying Japan's Texting Donations

Comments Filter:
  • Surprised? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Nimloth ( 704789 ) on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:05PM (#35601408)

    And the company handling these donations, mGive.com, has not waived the transaction fees it charges relief agencies.

    These companies profit from situations like this. This is their business case. What did you expect?

  • Re:Surprised? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by nomadic ( 141991 ) <nomadicworld@@@gmail...com> on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:16PM (#35601600) Homepage
    Right, so the accusation that they're unduly delaying the donations is a valid one. However, the accusation that they're following their business model, is not. Now you can criticize the business model as a whole on moral grounds if you wish, but arguing that they should waive the charge in this specific case makes no sense.
  • by ackthpt ( 218170 ) on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:20PM (#35601672) Homepage Journal

    The day the Tsunami hit I scampered out the door to give a pint of blood. Later that day I thought of putting a item on an eBay auction to raise some fundage for American Red Cross. Ebay listing page allowed me to pick a charity and a percentage to go there. Wonderful. The listing was published and had a big banner about the Red Cross added to it.

    After the auction ended the trouble began. The buyer paid and I found the money sitting in my PayPal account, with their customary cut removed from it. WTF?!? I drop a note to PayPal that this must be some sort of error, the money should have gone straight to American Red Cross. No reply, typical.

    Then I get on the online support with someone and tell them about it and ask them to send the answer to my email (the one I provided) and again I get nothing. Bother.

    Finally over the weekend I spend 2.5 hours waiting through the queue for help by apparently the only on-line customer support person they had working (this smells like the business model: we have few complaints to our customer support so satisfaction must be nearly 100%, but I digress) It is finally explained to me that I had to set up a Mission Fish account first so the payment would have been routed to them. Excuse me? You let me list an item where 100% was to go to a registered charity, but didn't establish a precondition of publishing the listing that the Mission Fish account be set up first, while the charity logo and mission are splashed all over a listing - yet the payment for it can completely bypass the charity? Hello, this looks like enabling Donor Fraud.

    I finally have had enough of their stupidity and go over to American Red Cross website and donate directly, including the sum I received for the auctioned item. I'm beside myself with the stupidity of corporations, but with eBay this is nothing new. Since 1999 they've gone from good to bad to worse.

    Be wary of donating via eBay. No guarantee the funds you pay do go where you think.

  • by joelsherrill ( 132624 ) on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:24PM (#35601762) Homepage

    My grandfather always used to tell me that he would die before he ever gave to the Red Cross. When he was in Korea, the Red Cross used to show up and sell soldiers coffee and donuts (at a profit, no less). No money meant no coffee and donuts for you, G.I.

    My grandfather was in WWII and had the same feelings for the Red Cross for the reason. Never heard anyone else mention it.

  • Coffee and Donuts (Score:5, Interesting)

    by StikyPad ( 445176 ) on Thursday March 24, 2011 @02:35PM (#35601940) Homepage

    The Red Cross sold coffee and donuts instead of giving them away to military personnel during World War II.
    This unfortunate policy came into being because service agencies in Britain helping British military personnel were less well-financed than the American Red Cross. Thus, these agencies were forced to charge British military members for the same items that American service members were getting free from the American Red Cross.

    To avoid further embarrassment to the British, who were playing host to thousands of U.S. troops, the U.S. Secretary of War requested that the American Red Cross begin charging American service members for such items as coffee and donuts in its canteens. The Red Cross interpreted this request as a wartime demand and complied so that it could continue aiding U.S. troops. However, the Red Cross sold items at or below cost and never profited a penny from these sales.

    Since the end of World War II, the American Red Cross has not charged military personnel -- not in the Korean, Vietnam, or Persian Gulf conflicts, for example.
    -- http://www.redcross.org [redcross.org]

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...