Microsoft: No Tablets Until It's Distinctive 203
Posted
by
CmdrTaco
from the build-up-them-forearms dept.
from the build-up-them-forearms dept.
BogenDorpher pointed us in the direction of a pocket-lint story saying
"Microsoft’s UK managing director and ex-BBC man Ashley Highfield has exclusively told Pocket-lint that the company won’t produce a tablet device, and therefore follow in the footsteps of Apple and Google, until it's got something to shout about. 'We won't do anything in the tablet market unless we can be distinctive,' he told us." Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?
In other words... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In other words... (Score:4, Insightful)
Shouldn't it be:
We are waiting for another company to come up with something cool so we can buy it and put our name on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I don't know; Microsoft has often been less than original, but look at what they did with console gaming: they pretty much ignored the industry entirely until they came out with the Xbox which was pretty innovative (e.g., different sized controllers, hard drive, robust and stable online component.) It wasn't entirely influential - Nintendo will always do their own thing - but I think the current shape of the console market (DLC, downloadable games, online marketplaces, the prevalence of online play) was l
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I love bashing Microsoft as much as the next guy, but I disagree. The standard components in the XBox did allow developers to do stuff that wasn't possible on the PC - the minimum spec for Halo 2 on the PC is vastly above the original XBox spec. So they had the combined advantages of a familiar development environment (DirectX) and a standard platform. Innovative? Maybe not, but a damn good idea nonetheless. I guess you could say it's the same thing that the Phantom was supposed to be. Also - Kinect? Innova
Re: (Score:2)
I love bashing Microsoft as much as the next guy, but I disagree. The standard components in the XBox did allow developers to do stuff that wasn't possible on the PC - the minimum spec for Halo 2 on the PC is vastly above the original XBox spec.
Uh, what? They wrote a game that could run on a 733MHz P3 with a Geforce 4 and 64MB (?) of RAM, but they couldn't run that on a real PC without requiring much more powerful hardware?
Either they did a lousy port to the PC, or Windows is imposing massive overheads which don't apply on the Xbox.
Re:In other words... (Score:4, Funny)
Either they did a lousy port to the PC, or Windows is imposing massive overheads which don't apply on the Xbox.
Yes.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
But, consoles had already had standard specs and uniformity ... all Microsoft really did was to take
Re: (Score:2)
So they have "high precision" full body tracking and aren't doing games that would benefit the most?
Re: (Score:3)
In fairness to Microsoft, the Kinect can't detect any twist in your wrist, so apparently golf is something it won't really be able to support.
At some point there might be an evolution that allows for it ... but I think right now the technology simply wouldn't work with a golf game since it can't read one of the aspects of a golf swing that is important.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So, then you might call the original xbox 'distinctive' because of it's online content, which still remains as a 'distinct' advantage?
I'll make the bold guess that they are working on a touchless interface for their tablet. If not then they should be working on extending the kinects tech; as Microsoft hasn't done anything but break even on the gaming division, it might make the whole enterprise worth while.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think there was nothing innovative about an American console in a Japanese dominated market that allowed cross-development (PC-Xbox) in a proprietary market and online-capabilities in an offline world, you are either blind to history or just have an axe to grind.
Re: (Score:3)
So other than nationalism got anything to offer?
Cross development is nothing new.
"online-capabilities in an offline world"
What does that nonsense even mean? Online PC gaming was quite popular when the xbox came out. The PS2 had online games as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Wait...so its innovation was being Dreamcast II?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:In other words... (Score:4, Insightful)
Different size controllers?
Those things were unusable for all but sasquatch. I would not call killing off online play for Halo2 robust and stable. I and many others still play the original counterstrike online for a timeline comparison. DLC has existed in computer gaming for a lot longer than the xbox existsed same with online market places and online play. Microsoft copied from the pc gaming market and brought that to consoles.
Re:In other words... (Score:5, Informative)
They already released their "slate" with HP [engadget.com] with Balmer being on stage to introduce it:
"press images of the HP Slate just hit the web, right as Ballmer showed it off during his CES keynote. The prototype device is said to be coming later this year, and it's running Windows -- Ballmer showed it running the PC Kindle app."
Fortunately for them it has bombed so badly they actaully have a chance of people buying this shit about them not wanting in the tablet market yet.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
HP hasn't bombed as badly as you think. Yes, it's not ideal for the average consumer, and yes their WebOS tablets mean that they'll essentially be directly competing with themselves, but they're really not. From the get-go, anyone with a brain stem was able to figure out that the HP Slate was not a tablet for the masses. It's a tablet to serve a niche market - the group of people who need a tablet that runs Windows. Believe it or not, that market does exist. It's small but viable, since HP has been making s
Re: (Score:2)
Courier was a pretty good idea. I think Microsoft has plenty of ideas, but is still struggling with the engineering it takes to implement them.
I think ideas start out as, "here's a whole new UI paradigm" then quickly moves to "man, this is hard and requires a lot of teams to coordinate" to "how about we just put a new menu item in there?"
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Only if the latest update did not brick your phone. Congratulations if it is working for you and but the other windows phone 7 owner must have been the one complaining about that issue then. Soon you might have some apps to use it in.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
For once? They've done that twice recently, once with the Zune and again with Windows Phone 7. Their biggest problem is having a piss poor marketing department. The Zune was a great player, yet the marketing made it look very unattractive for most. Windows Phone 7 is just suffering from a lack of any kind of decent marketing at all.
IMO, the Microsoft of today is not the Microsoft of yesterday. Windows 7, Windows Phone 7, and Zune are all fantastic platforms that are extremely stable and show a lot of f
Re: (Score:3)
I wouldn't call Windows Phone 7 "innovation". It's a low-rent copy of the Apple model that also tries to leverage Office lock-in to push into the business space.
Re:In other words... (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, it's considerably like the Apple. It has a screen about the same size. It runs apps. It uses touch input to select icons. It's used to make phone calls. It's a personal information manager.
If you mean it's not as good then fine. If you mean it doesn't have near the offerings then fine. If you mean it has problems with updates then fine. If you mean it doesn't have multitasking then fine. If you mean it is barely a smart phone then fine.
But, I've seen it. My niece has one. I used it for a while to get the feel. It's pretty sharp. It's also confusing and quite a bit more primitive than most other phone OSes. I'd never buy one myself. I'm sure it's a competent phone, as far as being a phone.
Re: (Score:2)
One of the guys here recently got a Windows Phone 7. VERY nice. However, I was very annoyed that everything had to be done through Zune software. (Same annoyance with Apple & Itunes BTW.) But it really is a nice phone. I was quite impressed by the interface.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
M$ fired the guys who had already designed one (Score:5, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Courier [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re:M$ fired the guys who had already designed one (Score:4, Interesting)
Basically, there was no way for the end device to live up to the dream that had risen around the publicised concept - or more correctly, no way for it to come in on time, in budget and fulfil everyones fantasies.
Microsoft had two options - get rid of the project quickly, or fail to deliver to the standard of the hype and suffer the consequences. So they ditched the project, which is pretty much their only real option.
Re: (Score:2)
Or
They could have down played the concept and said that the prototype was just a prototype and not all the desired features were available .. yet. It doesn't have to be a "homerun" to start. The first iPhone wasn't stellar. It was a game changer non-the-less.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't buy it. Microsoft's whole product strategy is to promise the moon and deliver a slice of swiss cheese. Every single one of their releases after Windows 3.0 has been hyped up to an incredible degree, features have been promised that will revolutionize computing, and then 95% of it gets dropped when the next version of the OS comes out. This they have done time and time again, so often that it's a standard joke among people who are familiar with computers.
To suggest that they'd fire somebody who wa
Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
So not only are they late to the party, they're not even sure what to bring and whether they'll come at all.
That's some solid vision you're showing there, mister Ballmer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
But even so, MS has loads of money. They've got enough money that they can avoid releasing a crappy product just to have a product out there.
Re: (Score:3)
For a software company like Microsoft, that's a pretty sad state to be in, given that fact tablets have been "the next big thing" for at least a year now.
Bill Gates was telling me that Tablet PCs were "the next big thing" back in 2001. It's not like Microsoft haven't seen this coming.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
All the "Tablet Edition" features are built into regular Windows Vista and Windows 7.
I installed Vista on my standard tablet, and as soon as it picked up it was on a tablet, it gave me my on-screen keyboard, handwriting recognition, etc. features. It even had that stupid game where you could use the pen to draw lines and bounce balls around.
In short, it didn't go away, it just got rolled-in to the base product.
And in response to your negativity, I know a lot of pharmacists and nurses who will let you take t
Re:Wow (Score:4, Informative)
Mod parent up. The exact quote, and source:
"The tablet takes cutting-edge PC technology and makes it available whenever you want it, which is why I'm already using a tablet as my everyday computer," Gates said. "It's a PC that is virtually without limits -- and within five years I predict it will be the most popular form of PC sold in America."
- Bill Gates, November 12, 2001 [cnn.com] when Microsoft was introducing Windows XP for Tablet PCs. [wikipedia.org]
Alan Kay said The best way to predict the future is to invent it. [wikiquote.org] I think it's clear that the current Apple under Steve Jobs is better than MS under Gates and Ballmer at delivering in this particular area.
Re:Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
> ... that's a pretty sad state to be in, given that fact tablets have
> been "the next big thing" for at least a year now.
Well, no.
A sad state is to have been shipping tablet/touch/PDA operating systems on and off for almost 20 years, and suddenly admit you don't have a clue what to do when tablets suddenly take off.
Re: (Score:2)
Not every party is worth attending.
And besides, MS wants to write the software for tablets made by other firms, and maybe these would find it reassuring that they won't be competing with MS branded hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I actually liked the idea behind courier (Score:4, Interesting)
A folding tablet design which allowed pen entry. I already have a BT keyboard for my iPad as I found that I as used it more that input became more and more of an issue. Voice recognition won't work in a meeting and the built in keyboard can be a pain. Hence I have a clam shell case with BT keyboard. I remember the old Palm days with their shorthand and such. Adapt that idea. Give me alternative methods of entering data. Tie it all together with One Note. The folding / split screen approach would allow easy separation of work as well let alone make it more compact to carry.
Still the more I use my tablet the more I begin to wonder how long they will persist, they are good for presenting what I have, not so much for creating on, at least in the business environment
Re: (Score:2)
A folding tablet which allows pen entry... isn't Nintendo making those ;-) Okay, those aren't really tablets, but it still doesn't sound like the distinctiveness they're looking for.
Re: (Score:2)
A folding tablet which allows pen entry... isn't Nintendo making those ;-)
DS family as tablet has two problems: First, Nintendo has long had a policy of no apps from home-based businesses. Microsoft is the only game console maker with anything like Xbox Live Indie Games. Second, even the bigger screen of the 3DS is substantially smaller than a 7" tablet. If you're willing to use a 3DS sized tablet, you might as well use a Windows phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Still the more I use my tablet the more I begin to wonder how long they will persist, they are good for presenting what I have, not so much for creating on, at least in the business environment
This could be a big deal - it's been said a few times that tablets/smartphones are better for people who consume, while desktops/laptops are better for people who create. I wonder how many of today's creators are only creating because they happened to be in a home with a desktop or laptop because that was previously the only choice for consuming? I wonder, as more homes switch to a consumer only model, whether this will have any impact on our culture in the future.
Prosumption (Score:2)
I wonder how many of today's creators are only creating because they happened to be in a home with a desktop or laptop because that was previously the only choice for consuming?
I'm working on an essay about stepping up from consuming to creating [pineight.com], and I'd appreciate your comments.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember the old Palm days with their shorthand and such. Adapt that idea. Give me alternative methods of entering data. Tie it all together with One Note.
This.
I have been a devout Linux user for the past eight years, and have been completely Windows-free for about six years now. But I have said over and over that I would love a pen-entry & One-Note device for my academic and research work. Alas, it just doesn't exist. There is a fellow student in my research group that has a Win7 touchscreen laptop with the flip-around screen. He uses it primarily for OneNote, but he has had so many problems with it (too heavy, driver issues, loose connections and ran
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand the love people have for One Note. I had it on my tablet a few years back. It was pretty bad at handwriting recognition and I just couldn't see the point of taking handwritten notes on a tablet when I could do it faster and more accurately on a keyboard.
Tradeoff, battery life vs weight, color, wifi (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a problem (Score:5, Funny)
Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?
My arm gets plenty of exercise.
Re: (Score:3)
Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?
My arm gets plenty of exercise.
Doesn't it deplete the battery really fast ?
Re: (Score:2)
XP Tablet Edition (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Wont produce a tablet? correct... (Score:3)
Microsoft has been big on tablets cince 1992. Vista and 7 come with tablet functions in it and XP was the last good iteration with their tablet add on package.
Plus why should they make a tablet? Fujitsu and others make tablet hardware that is 900X better than anything that Microsoft could ever make.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How does that makes them "big on tablets cince (sic) 1992"?
I think he means: Microsoft have been trying to sell tablets to people since 1992 and consistently failed. Now more innovative companies have taken over the market Microsoft are taking their ball and going home.
Microsoft’s UK managing director (Score:2)
I wonder if "Microsoft’s UK managing director" is really in the loop.
I am sure Microsoft will do a tablet within a year.
Of course, they probably won't do the hardware.
The distinctive things will be: familiar dotnet environment, runs your legacy windows apps, put some small new thing like a transparent mode.
I Can Respect That Decision (Score:2)
Good for Microsoft. It's nice to see a company realizing that a shitty product could be worse than no product. When they do come out with something, it should be worth a look.
I'm guessing Windows Phone 7 / CE is going to be their tablet OS of choice, or perhaps their XBox OS.
Already working on it (Score:2)
Ah well, smell the vaporware (Score:2)
the problem for Microsoft is that new developments in hardware start low and build up - thus the PC grew out of the enthusiast market and came to replace the minicomputer, and the smartphone replaced the phone. AFAIK nobody has successfully done the reverse - i.e. started big and made it small. Microsoft's phones have been failures. Why should a tablet be any different? They will simply be unable to leave out all the stuff that makes Windows what it is, so it will always be mo
Re: (Score:2)
I can speak for WinMo 7, but the problem with WinMo 6 was that it was basically windows 95, shrunk down to a sub-VGA resolution. You couldn't do jack without a stylus on my Omnia. In fact, you couldn't even find a WMP skins* that would give the media player decently sized buttons (decently sized meaning that you could do simple things, like pause podcasts without accidentally pressing the fast forward or rewind buttons, turn the volume up or down, etc, without using a stylus). You can't just shrink the wind
Weight (Score:2)
Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?
The problem isn't the tablet. It's your arm.
Hover tablet (Score:2)
Distinctive is a mistake (Score:2)
In the world of tablets, the expectation isn't to be compatible with anything in particular. It's mostly about viewing things and not so much about editing or creating things. To that end, this is why Android tablets and iPad are successful -- it doesn't have to be "compatible" with anything but web standards.
Being able to view Office documents is just about the only thing of interest which is typically no big deal as those apps exist in abundance.
As for the user interface? It's all about touch gestures
Distinctive. (Score:2)
Zune was distinctive, and not just its colour scheme. I'm sure they could 'biggie' that squirt technology and have a tablet that could fling a poo. Imagine the Blamer dance with a poo flinging Bune.
Arms ache? (Score:2)
Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?
Have you considered developing some muscle tone? My 4 year old can use the iPad for as long as I will let him with no complaints, and I have the heavier old model.
Distinctive? (Score:2)
Not being distinctive has never stopped Microsoft from doing, well, pretty much anything in the past. Why is it stopping them now, I wonder?
Graphic Artists (Score:2)
want a lightweight device that can run their Photoshop/Painter/etc. and has good pressure sensitivity (>512 "levels").
They practically all broke down in tears when they found out the ipad was essentially a giant iphone and not a productivity device they could really utilize.
Granted - the processing power required to run those programs might currently be a bit much for the form factor of the ipad, but it's definitely something to strive for, IMO. The market is definitely there.
Re: (Score:2)
1000% this.
Apple has always had the graphic design market, but it shocks me that they haven't designed some flavor of the iPad to target this demographic. Steve Jobs may have said that the stylus is a bad input method (and for a cell phone it is), but Wacom makes a mint selling pen input pads, and every graphic designer I know has one. A GD friend of mine actually contemplated getting an HP Slate due to its hybrid touch/stylus input in conjunction with the ability to run Photoshop and Illustrator.
IMO what A
your arm aches after 5 minutes? (Score:2)
You're not masturbating nearly enough.
Scrawny weaklings (Score:2)
"Have you considered making it light enough that your arm doesn't ache after 5 minutes?"
Have you considered getting a 10-pound weight and lifting it a couple of times?
In other words... (Score:2)
They tried, it sucked, they buried it.
Translation (Score:2)
Translation:
WinMo 7 Ain't selling, and we're not going to throw any more money down that hole until we see some results.
Roughly translated.... (Score:2)
"If we come out with one now, we can't shed our, 'Me too!' image."
And in all honesty, it's not exactly the worst move for them either.
Re: (Score:3)
It's already been several generations.
I had a tablet running Windows for Workgroups 3.11 tablet edition back in the 90's on my Dauphin DTR-1
Re: (Score:2)
Like the other guy hinted at, Microsoft has launched about five generations of tablets already.
Pretty much every single one flopped.
Re: (Score:2)
I too find that exercise is best done while thinking about something else. This is why I like riding an actual bicycle -- I am thinking about where I am going and what is going on around me all the time. If you are on an exercise machine, all you are thinking about is the exercise and before you know it, you feel tired! Not to mention bored.
Re: (Score:2)
that's why you put on a dvd or a good cd and just zone out... or ignore the fact that you're exercising and just enjoy the show. I live in a part of the world that's frozen 6 months a year, and it's impractical at best to go out running in the dead of the winter. But I *can* put on a DVD in my laptop, put the volume up high, and forget the fact that I'm running on an elliptical for 45 minutes every day. When the weather's warm enough, I'll move outside. When it's frozen, my choices are to curtail my exercis
Re: (Score:2)
Why not use flexible circuitry and AMOLEDs to build the screen and a modicum of a body, while the main processing and storage is handled in a separate package communication over encrypted wireless. That way you could even wrap it around your arm for easy access, and look pretty sci-fi with it, while still being useful.
Yes, I know this probably has a hundred and one kinks in the design that need to be worked out. But it still sounds fun...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Back to the iPad, that Xoom keyboard is terrible.
Re: (Score:2)
At least with the Xoom you aren't going to have to hold it for long. Motorola needs to work on the battery life.
Re:One word (Score:4, Funny)
Google Comic Sans
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They tried, it failed (Libretto W105) (Score:2)
review [engadget.com]