Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Ubuntu Businesses Operating Systems Apple

Is Canonical the Next Apple? 511

An anonymous reader writes "With the release of 11.04 Natty Narwhal, Canonical is taking Ubuntu in a new direction, which puts cloud services and content like music at the forefront of the Ubuntu experience. Ubuntu is no longer 'Linux,' or 'desktop' or 'netbook'; it's just Ubuntu for clients and servers. Ubuntu has its own desktop in Unity, app store (Software Center), music service and personal cloud. If Ubuntu takes off, will it make Canonical the next Apple? Of course, Canonical doesn't sell computers, but then again Ubuntu can be used on any computer, even Macs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is Canonical the Next Apple?

Comments Filter:
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday April 29, 2011 @10:31AM (#35974552)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29, 2011 @10:36AM (#35974614)

    Actually, the Ubuntu names are much easier to search for because they are less common. I always figured that this was their motive for choosing them. For example, you can type "natty virtualbox" or "lucid virtualbox" and get relevant results quickly and easily, that are zeroed in on what you are looking for.

  • Re:No. (Score:3, Informative)

    by clang_jangle ( 975789 ) on Friday April 29, 2011 @10:59AM (#35974926) Journal
    It works just fine on my Thinkpad running gentoo. Yes, there are chipsets with little or no acpi support in Linux -- so if you like using Linux don't buy those. You *did* check your choices against the lists of supported hardware before spending, right? 'Cause that usually works pretty well over here... :)
  • by Moryath ( 553296 ) on Friday April 29, 2011 @11:07AM (#35975032)

    Howso? I'm not a Mac person nor am I a Linuxhead. But I can tell you that most non-Mac people can name at least one of the Apple release titles, probably more, whereas mentioning Ubuntu will get you that blank stare.

    The Ubuntu guys suck at marketing. Most of the Linux world sucks at marketing. One of the biggest reasons it's so hard for them to get any appreciable marketshare in the desktop world is that despite giving away what is very serviceable, functional product for free, they suck at marketing.

    And without marketshare, how are you going to get the rest of the ecosystem to port over to you? Answer is, you aren't. Without a certain amount of marketshare, you can't get games ported, you can't get office applications ported, you can't even convince many of the makers to hire someone to make sure they are interoperable. And "Open Standards Open Standards Whee" as chanted by 4-year-old wannabe cheerleaders doesn't do crap for you when you're trying to sell adoption to someone and they have to interact with their clients, who all just-so-happen to use OSX or Windows with some form of MS Office (now with .DOCX so that OpenOffice is no longer interoperable... not that it ever rendered anything more than basic Excel docs correctly anyways) installed.

  • by Eponymous Coward ( 6097 ) on Friday April 29, 2011 @11:52AM (#35975524)

    For the record, I am a user who likes Unity. Sounds like I'm the only one though.

  • by ArcCoyote ( 634356 ) on Friday April 29, 2011 @12:00PM (#35975624)

    log out
    select your account
    select "Ubuntu Classic" from the session menu at the bottom,
    log back in.

    Problem Solved.

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...