Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Handhelds Transportation News

25% of Car Accidents Linked to Gadget Use 317

BogenDorpher writes "In a recent study by the Governors Highway Safety Association (PDF), driving distractions such as cell phones and other electronic devices cause as much as 25% of all US car accidents. It is common knowledge that driving while distracted is not a safe thing to do, but now we have some scientific data that goes in-depth on the topic. From the article: '"Despite all that has been written about driver distraction, there is still a lot that we do not know. Much of the research is incomplete or contradictory. Clearly, more studies need to be done addressing both the scope of the problem and how to effectively address it," said GHSA Executive Director Barbara Harsha.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

25% of Car Accidents Linked to Gadget Use

Comments Filter:
  • by MobileTatsu-NJG ( 946591 ) on Monday July 11, 2011 @09:55AM (#36719742)

    Does this mean that the number of car accidents has increased by 25?

    Maybe, but I have a feeling that what's happening is the number hasn't changed much, but before it was the radio and CD player. Something to consider: Cell phone bills will say very clearly whether or not it was involved, radios and CD players have no such tattling technology.

  • by __aaqvdr516 ( 975138 ) on Monday July 11, 2011 @10:27AM (#36720140)

    My wife always wondered why I was so adamant about not talking to her when she'd call me while she was driving. About a year ago she was in some stop-and-go traffic next to a person who was both making calls and texting during the traffic jam. At one point the traffic picked up speed and then slowed again but they didn't notice as they were too busy pushing buttons. She watched as the person was decapitated during the impact. She doesn't call me while driving anymore.

    It doesn't kill you 99.9% of the time but that one time is a doozy.

  • Make it easier?

    What? Huh? You think having a law against something makes it harder to do? The question is not "should we make it easier" or "should we make it harder" that option was never on the table...its mere fantasy.

    The question is, should we authorize jack booted thugs to hunt down and persecute people, for no other reason, than (insert distraction source of the moment) while driving, regardless of whether they are otherwise displaying a problem controlling their vehicle. That is the ONLY question actually on the table.

Kleeneness is next to Godelness.

Working...