Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security United States News

DHS Tries To Hide Mobile Scanner Details 201

OverTheGeicoE writes "The Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a Freedom of Information Act request last year (PDF) with the US Department of Homeland Security, whose Transportation Security Administration has been investigating the use of x-ray scanning technology for covert use in more public places, like train stations and even ordinary city streets. TSA has tested interesting devices like the Z Backscatter Vans both privately and on members of the general public. EPIC recently received new documents from DHS. Some of the documents are almost completely black from redactions."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DHS Tries To Hide Mobile Scanner Details

Comments Filter:
  • by chill ( 34294 ) on Thursday August 18, 2011 @06:21PM (#37135726) Journal

    The YouTube video in the first link is already yanked.

  • by Fluffeh ( 1273756 ) on Thursday August 18, 2011 @06:31PM (#37135798)

    If you repeat the same lie enough, people will start to believe it.

    - We are doing this for YOUR safety. There is nothing here you need to worry about. Everything is OK.

  • So what if (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 18, 2011 @06:34PM (#37135832)

    I'm walking down the street with a concealed handgun (perfectly legal in 30+ states) and the DHS van shows I'm packing heat. Next thing I know I'm on the ground with a knee in my back and automatic weapons pointed at me. Is this how it's going to work? Because if that's how it's going down, I see no reason not to overthrow this government now before it gets much worse. I'd rather live under anarchic self-rule than this nanny-state bullshit.

  • by dgatwood ( 11270 ) on Thursday August 18, 2011 @06:56PM (#37136000) Homepage Journal

    This is where you file a FOIA complaint and they get to sit there in front of a judge and explain why they deliberately attempted to evade a properly filed FOIA request with such a ridiculous response.

    Unfortunately, as far as I know, FOIA has no teeth, i.e. there's no way to prosecute these clowns for even such flagrant abuse. However, if a judge forces the information to be released and it is legally actionable information, they could potentially be charged with obstruction.

  • Re:So what if (Score:4, Interesting)

    by http ( 589131 ) on Thursday August 18, 2011 @07:35PM (#37136362) Homepage Journal
    It's not nanny state. The aim is interference, not nurturing.

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...