Forgot your password?

Close
typodupeerror
Businesses Facebook The Almighty Buck

Facebook To Put Off IPO Until Late 2012 129

Posted by samzenpus
from the status-delayed dept.
jfruhlinger writes "Facebook's whispered about IPO is one of the most anticipated in the industry — but it looks like we'll have to anticipate it for a bit longer. The Financial Times, quoting anonymous sources, says that it won't happen until late next year. Those sources say the purpose is to keep Facebook employees focused on product development, but it seems more likely that Facebook's bankers aren't happy with the company's numbers (or the economy's prospects)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook To Put Off IPO Until Late 2012 More

Facebook To Put Off IPO Until Late 2012

Comments Filter:

  • Re:Apocalypse how? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ge7 (2194648) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @05:41AM (#37407670)
    To be honest, Facebook has done a lot of good. It's incredibly easy to keep up with people living on the other side of the world, even with those you don't really know that well but still have gone out to bar sometimes etc. It has also brought businesses, restaurants and everything to one single page with one unified interface, so you don't have to hunt them from Google or other search engines. The real names and connections between people make it a lot easier for you to discover new things and people too. I can see the popularity and its reason, even though slashdot users seem to hate Facebook. I guess I'm just a little bit more social geek.

  • Can't wait to make these criminals billionaires (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 15, 2011 @05:48AM (#37407702)

    For all the privacy they've squashed and all the censorship they've jack booted.

    Some of the issues are collected here http://stallman.org/facebook.html [stallman.org]

  • Re:Too bad (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheRaven64 (641858) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @06:06AM (#37407778) Journal
    Doesn't matter. They've benefitted from it already, and without that pesky regulation stuff. The sold a big chunk of (massively overvalued) shares to Goldman Sachs, who then sold shares in a fund backed by Facebook shares. Because GS was the only shareholder, they didn't pass the threshold required to go public (and so have to publish accounts). Facebook got a big chunk of capital, GS got a new to you play their hype-and-dump games with, a load of rich people got to buy in early and enjoy the bubble, and a load of other people will get left holding the hot potato when they eventually revalue the fund to be based on something sane.

  • Ah, the grown ups have arrived. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Rogerborg (306625) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @06:14AM (#37407814) Homepage

    I've been in a tech company that was poised for an IPO just before the sub-prime bubble burst and rained on everyone's parade. An external firm was brought in to handle it, took one look at the books, and told us that we were, to paraphrase only very slightly, having a laugh.

    A business model based on growing on private investment rather than revenue, vastly over-inflated self estimate of worth, and years of accounting sleights of hand were easily rooted out.

    Sight unseen, I'd suspect - OK, to be honest, hope - that Facebook is in a similar situation. They may have to go through a few firms before they find out willing to take them to market with a multi billion dollar cap and a straight face.

  • Re:Apocalypse how? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ciderbrew (1860166) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @06:14AM (#37407816)
    To be honest it's a pain. It's blocked from just about every work place and even after you've clocked off and you want to go drinking all the info is locked away. The phone app is so invasive I've un-installed it and make do with awful webpages they serve up on mobile.

    I book people for events and people book me for events and to be honest, it's one more point of contact that I could do without. It's best use is for one to many dissemination of information. For many to many it is dire; but as so many people are on, it I'm stuck with it. It has a long way to go and I'm looking forward to the next company that steps over it with something better. Getting everyone to move will make that hard.

  • Re:Apocalypse how? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by arth1 (260657) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @07:12AM (#37407980) Homepage Journal

    If anything, Facebook has made it much harder for me to stay in touch with friends and relatives.
    Not being a social type, and having a taboo-strength aversion to any conversation in which I only know one of the parties, I'm just not Facebook compatible.
    So I rely on e-mail for communication. But with the advent of Facebook, people no longer check their e-mails, nor bother to reply. So I lose touch with people.

    I'm sure Facebook is great for those who are social. But it's crippling for those of us who can't cope with social situations.

  • A tough one (Score:3, Interesting)

    by datavirtue (1104259) on Thursday September 15, 2011 @07:20AM (#37408004)
    This is going to be a tough one. Google has already changed the game and Facebook is squirming. I see mainstream news stories about Facebook adding new features that copy Google+. Bankers have advisers who see this kind of thing happening. Frankly, any brokerages/banks willing to float the IPO are looking for an IMMEDIATE payoff (i.e. stripping new "investors" of their buy-in of common stock). Read the "Wall Street Jungle", its an old book the explains this stuff in a simple manner. It is not magic. Plus, the MySpace fiasco is still fresh in everyone's mind. It was SOOO hot!

I would like to urinate in an OVULAR, porcelain pool --

Close