Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
United States

Conflict Between Occupy Wall Street Protestors and NYPD Escalating 961

phx_zs writes "Today marks the tenth consecutive day that thousands of protesters have flooded the streets of Manhattan, specifically the financial district. ... Sunday marked a change of events as high-ranking NYPD officers exhibited brutal, unprovoked aggression on the peaceful group, reportedly arresting at least 80 people. Many photos and videos have surfaced of NYPD officers slamming protesters on the ground or into parked cars, and in one well-covered incident a NYPD officer (with pending police brutality charges from 2004) maced innocent female protesters point blank for no apparent reason. Many eyewitnesses and several news articles report that the NYPD specifically targeted photographers and media teams streaming the event live on the internet." Do any Slashdotters have eyewitness reports to share? There seems to be a lot of misinformation originating from all parties involved making it difficult to know how large the protest actually is at this point and whether or not the police are being quite as universally violent as the protestors imply.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Conflict Between Occupy Wall Street Protestors and NYPD Escalating

Comments Filter:
  • Lack of news (Score:5, Interesting)

    by iONiUM ( 530420 ) * on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @03:16PM (#37530052) Journal

    In Canada at least, there has been a serious lack of news about this protest. It's mentioned in passing sometimes, but that's about it. I don't even really know what it's about. I heard "protesting corporate greed in America", but I mean that's a tough thing to protest.. you're basically protesting capitalism..

    Anyways, my question is why is there such a media gap about this protest? Is it on purpose (tin foil hat), or is it just because it's vague and nobody really cares about it, so the media doesn't bother?

  • by OverlordQ ( 264228 ) on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @03:20PM (#37530110) Journal

    Is there any reliable coverage outside of these first person blogs?

  • Re:I'm confused (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @03:38PM (#37530430)

    Why would the police attach peaceful protesters? That doesn't make sense, those kinds of tactics were done away with after they sicced dogs on African Americans fighting for equal rights, that sort of thing just doesn't happen any more so if the police arrested 80 people they must have had good reason. We all know how violent the left can get these days.

    Don't invent theories about how you are sure no one would do something.

    I am old enough to remember dogs and firehouses being used on civil rights protesters. I also remember people making the same argument you do: The protesters must have done something violent, or be hiding weapons, or planning to loot shops, because the police are civilized people. Don't hypothesize about the morals of a large group of people. Look at what they are doing (there is a video), and judge them by their actions.

  • Re:Not just Canada (Score:3, Interesting)

    by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @03:38PM (#37530440) Homepage Journal

    This protest has failed to make headlines in the US as well.

    Probably because it is not a tea party protest.

    Those things seem to get a LOT of news reports these days...about how violent they are, etc....

    If it isn't a protest by a conservative group...well, the mainstream press doesn't seem to feel the need to take much interest in it...

    Then again..I don't see fox on it either....so, maybe both sides have a reason to ignore it....

  • Did you even watch any of the videos? Did you even look into this at all? I can't understand how you could have done so and still hold such an opinion.

    As far as I can tell, I don't agree with any of these people protesting. I am pretty much convinced their protests are ineffective and a waste of time, and that the individuals involved may, in fact, be wastes of perfectly good protoplasm.

    THAT BEING SAID, there is no excuse for the behavior of the NYPD in this incident. The behavior of the NYPD Commanders during this protest has been disgusting, immoral, illegal, and against everything we as a Nation are supposed to stand for. But what is even more disgusting is how the NYPD immediately closed ranks on this matter, excusing their behavior as completely reasonable. What is even MORE disgusting than that, however, is citizens such as yourself who are willing to give the Police a blank check to do whatever they want to people you dislike or don't agree with.

    Shame on you. You aren't worthy to lick the boots of those who shed blood to secure the rights you'd see others denied.

  • Re:Policy City-State (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Trepidity ( 597 ) <[gro.hsikcah] [ta] [todhsals-muiriled]> on Tuesday September 27, 2011 @03:49PM (#37530662)

    The level of violence of U.S. cops "on the scene" is pretty surprising by most civilized standards. I will agree it's not a "police state" because the biggest marker of those is what happens more generally if you're arrested (e.g. do thousands of people get disappeared?). In the U.S. a typical arrested protestor will just be released, sometimes cited, though occasionally prosecutors do go overboard with charges intended to intimidate. There are a handful of more worrying terrorism detention-without-trial cases, but I haven't heard of that being used in relation to street protests.

    It does seem strange that the level of violence on-the-scene is needed, though. Sure, it's not mowing people down, Tiananmen style, but it seems pretty excessive. I don't know if it's an attempt to scare off "normal" people from showing up (which leads to a vicious cycle of only more-extreme people being willing to show up), or if it's just the individual work of not-very-disciplined cops.

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...