Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Open Source Software News

Looking Back On a Year of LibreOffice 242

superapecommando writes "Simon Phipps, former head of open source at Sun and a backer of LibreOffice, looks at a tempestuous year for the OpenOffice fork. 'Once framed as an impetuous fork, LibreOffice has become the standard-bearer for the former OpenOffice community,' he says. 'It's far from perfect, of course. New open source projects never are and volunteer projects lack the corporate resources to make it look otherwise. But I have no doubt that it's working.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Looking Back On a Year of LibreOffice

Comments Filter:
  • Java Not Required (Score:5, Informative)

    by CritterNYC ( 190163 ) on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @08:44PM (#37606958) Homepage
    Java is only used for the Base database utility and a number of new document wizards plus a few other minor bits. The rest of LibreOffice has no Java components, so Java has nothing to do with normal usage of the word processor, spreadsheet, presentation tool or drawing programs. Ribbon use is subjective. Like many others, I hate it. It's clumsy and harder to find what you need.
  • Re:Java? (Score:5, Informative)

    by MechaStreisand ( 585905 ) on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @09:19PM (#37607240)
    The problem is generally that Java applications become huge and bloated because the language is so verbose and inexpressive. See Steve Yegge's essay [blogspot.com] on the topic.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @09:51PM (#37607466)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Java? (Score:5, Informative)

    by StormyMonday ( 163372 ) on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @11:04PM (#37607904) Homepage

    As others have pointed out, the main Java GUI (SWING) is a real pig. This is a result of Java's "compile once, run anywhere" philosophy colliding with different OS GUIs.

    The other problem is that Java's startup time is ridiculous. Load the VM, load the code, load the libraries (*lots* of libraries!), verify the libraries and the code, initialize the libraries (lots of .properties files!) and the code, and then run.

    Once the startup hooplah is over, Java code is quite reasonably fast. Benchmarks either minimize the startup time by, say, running 10,000 iterations of a loop, or eliminating it entirely by using "flying start" techniques.

  • Re:Java Not Required (Score:2, Informative)

    by Nutria ( 679911 ) on Tuesday October 04, 2011 @11:47PM (#37608170)

    A year ago

    How ironic that CritterNYC said that "The rest of LibreOffice has no Java components", you complain about OpenOffice.org from one year ago and this topic is on the of LibreOffice.

    Your FAIL is Big, Fat, Hairy and smells like Stupid.

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...