Juror's Tweets Overturn Trial Verdict 423
D H NG writes "The Arkansas Supreme Court had overturned a murder conviction due to a juror tweeting during the trial. Erickson Dimas-Martinez was convicted in 2010 of killing a teenager and was sentenced to death. His lawyers appealed the case on account of a juror tweeting his musings during the trial and because another juror nodded off during the presentation of evidence. Tweets sent include 'The coffee here sucks' and 'Court. Day 5. here we go again.' In an opinion, Associate Justice Donald Corbin wrote 'because of the very nature of Twitter as an... online social media site, Juror 2's tweets about the trial were very much public discussions.' Dimas-Martinez is to be given a new trial."
Uh oh. (Score:5, Funny)
I've got jury duty next week.
I'll have to remember not to complain about the coffee.
Re:Uh oh. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Uh oh. (Score:5, Funny)
He's ignorant - but, as someone with a lower UID than you, I find you guilty of being a cockbag.
Re:Uh oh. (Score:5, Funny)
Jury nulification means finding the defendant innocent regardless of the evidence against them. This is something jurors have a constitutional right to do. If you don't think the act the defendant was charged with should be against the law, you can find them not innocent even if it is absolutely obvious they did it.
Please, please do not find me "not innocent"...
Your Honor, We the jury find the defendant "Not Innocent" by reason of dyslexia!