Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security United States News

TSA Interested In Purchasing Dosimeters 117

OverTheGeicoE writes "TSA recently announced that it is looking for vendors of 'radiation measurement devices'. According to the agency's Request for Information, these devices 'will assist the TSA in determining if the Transportation Security Officers (TSO) at selected federalized airports are exposed to ionizing radiation above minimum detectable levels, and whether any measured radiation doses approach or exceed the threshold where personnel dosimetry monitoring is required by DHS/TSA policy.' A TSA spokeman claims that their RFI 'did not reflect any heightened concern by the agency about radiation levels that might be excessive or pose a risk to either TSA screeners or members of the traveling public.' Concern outside the agency, however, has always been high. TSA has long been criticized for its apparent lack of understanding of radiological safety, even for its own employees. There has been speculation of a cancer cluster, possibly caused by poor safety practices in baggage screening."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TSA Interested In Purchasing Dosimeters

Comments Filter:
  • by Pirate_Pettit ( 1531797 ) on Saturday January 07, 2012 @10:55AM (#38621366)
    Even hospital personnel with only occasional, incidental proximity to x-ray devices wear film badges. I'm honestly surprised that people operating technology that emits ionizing radiation aren't wearing exposure devices already!
  • Re:Karma? (Score:4, Informative)

    by lophophore ( 4087 ) on Saturday January 07, 2012 @11:03AM (#38621400) Homepage

    The TSA agents are people, people that need a job. Just because their job make your airport visit a little less comfortable does not mean you should wish cancer or infirmity on them. Bad Karma on you, I say.

    They absolutely should be wearing dosimeters. OSHA should be all over this, but that would be like your cop uncle giving your dad a parking ticket.

    As far as the policy goes, I agree with Bruce Schneier, it is "security theater" and I don't believe it is effective.

    read this: http://www.cntraveler.com/travel-tips/safety-and-security/2007/03/Inside-Job-My-Life-as-an-Airport-Screener.print [cntraveler.com] to find out what it's like on the other side.

    "Within an hour, two of the three lanes at our location are shut down because of possible radiation leakage from the X-ray machines—an inspection reveals that the heavy flaps which seal the compartment are defective. A co-worker who's been on the job since before 9/11 tells me that screeners used to be given dosimeters to measure their exposure to radiation but that the devices were eliminated in a cost-cutting measure. We were told in training that OSHA has determined that our exposure levels are acceptable, and that is the last time I hear it mentioned. It takes days before the machines are back up and running."

  • by zwede ( 1478355 ) on Saturday January 07, 2012 @04:39PM (#38624468)

    My only experience with the scanners was the Dallas International airport. I just politely told them I'd like to opt out of the scanner. The guy pointed me over to another guy and told him I was an "opt-out" in a loud voice. Several people in line looked surprised there was such a thing as "opt out" (sigh). I got a pat down without any junk-grabbing and I was on my way in about 30 seconds.

Disclaimer: "These opinions are my own, though for a small fee they be yours too." -- Dave Haynie

Working...