Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google The Almighty Buck Technology

Schmidt: Google Once Considered Issuing Currency 189

itwbennett writes "In his keynote speech at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Google Chairman Eric Schmidt said the company once 'had various proposals to have [its] own currency [it was] going to call Google Bucks.' The idea was to implement a 'peer-to-peer money' system, but it was squelched by legal issues."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Schmidt: Google Once Considered Issuing Currency

Comments Filter:
  • by Fluffeh ( 1273756 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @01:24AM (#39194141)

    One would argue that they might not do a better job compared to the leaders that we currently vote in.

    Here's one for you. Opt in citizenship to a nationless, territory free country. I wonder how many might not try to be a part of such a thing. I often wondered what would happen if a group started buying up adjoining land and reserved it for new members, and spread out and out as more members joined. Set up a civilised statute early on and let people come in as they wanted to.

    It would be like colonising an already colonised land through market transactions and finance. I also think it would scare the bejesus out of the governments.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @01:28AM (#39194163)

    Social Networking is missing a major concept right now. Everyone has something they want to sell. Why not let every social networking user setup a "web store" in their profile to sell things to other users. Think Facebook + Paypal + EBay. Some people will sell services, while others will sell crafts, home made things, or even used items. I know my local club, which has a Facebook group page, would love to sell T-Shirts and buttons to fans of ours. This seems like a missed opportunity. If Google want to get involved with commerce then all they need to do is set it up in Google+.

    Don't get me started on my other Google rant. Google+ should have been named "Google Me". Would have been a lot more cool.

  • by GoodNewsJimDotCom ( 2244874 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @02:04AM (#39194345)
    I wonder what the conversion rate of a 50 dollar bill is into Gooney.

    Ah, Gooney sounds kinda lame, I'd have went for street rep instead and called it G-Money.
  • by mykos ( 1627575 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @02:05AM (#39194349)
    Right now, we get nothing in return for getting all our private data rummaged through by the government.

    At least google gives us useful free stuff.
  • by timeOday ( 582209 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @02:30AM (#39194457)
    Arbitration [wikipedia.org] (not arbitrage) occurs in various contexts all the time [google.com]. The same people who freak out about Muslims doing this among themselves, of course, have no qualms about this common practice in business, for example. Or maybe they are just mad because they assume the Muslims stole the idea from 1 Corinthians Chapter 6 [biblegateway.com] in the New Testament (yes, secular courts are clearly unbiblical).
  • by crf00 ( 1048098 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @03:10AM (#39194623) Homepage
    When I saw the phrase "peer to peer money's system" I immediately think of the Ripple Monetary System [ripple-project.org]. Please also check out the new Ripple website, Villages.cc [villages.cc], created by Ripple's founder Ryan Fugger last year.

    I am not sure whether Google was trying to do the same thing, but it would be a total waste if they gave up on the exact same idea. If there is one thing that Google should do with it's power, it would be P2P money. The entire economic system is in total mess now, and the whole world is in deep need right now for a better economic system, yet why is the financial regulation trying to stop all innovations happening?

    The US government is seriously killing all financial innovations by labeling everything alternative to the USD as "money laundering". Remember how Liberty dollar and other gold currencies ended up? How about the countless payment startups that has been killed under the name "money laundering" during the dotcom boom? The Hawala System [wikipedia.org] is very useful even today and it has a very similar concept to Ripple, but it's whole advantages are completely denied by US in the name of money laundering, again. I bet that the FBI would even declare Bitcoin as illegal when it generates enough threat.

    I have only been staying in Stockholm for a month, but currently it gives me the feeling that Sweden and some other Europe countries have much more financial freedom than in US. If I were to create a startup based on alternative currencies ideas similar to Google's P2P money or Ripple, then Stockholm would be a much better place than Silicon Valley, all due to the absurd US anti-money laundering regulation.
  • by Cryacin ( 657549 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @06:27AM (#39195347)
    Actually, there are already several principalities around the world. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Hutt_River [wikipedia.org]

    The problem is how to be legally recognised as a seperate country. There have been several groups who have decided to take the easiest legal route, which is to declare war upon a country. Note that in the wikipedia article, the declaration of war is mentioned in the history section. The Australian government did not acknowledge these letters officially, as this would give creedence to the country's secession. They have issued their own coins, code of laws, and a tax rate of 0.5%.

    There are many such countries out there, but what has not been done to date, is a serious quantity of land to be bought by a serious number of citizens, an army mounted, and a genuine declaration of war. This would seriously best be done in a place such as Africa or regions of South America where there are areas of land that can be bought at reasonable rates, whilst not being a pacific island that would hold difficulties in sustaining a substantial population.

    Perhaps one day the need will be large enough for people to collectively leave and equitably found their own country, but don't forget, established countries will first scoff at a new country, possibly impose trade sanctions if they don't tow the line, and finally, simply declare war and "liberate" it from the "terrorists".

    The issues of state are far removed from the issues of daily life.
  • Why legal issues? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by kbg ( 241421 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @07:10AM (#39195515)
    Why would that have legal issues? Doesn't Microsoft have it's own currency called "Microsoft Points"? There doesn't seem to be any problems using that currency?
  • by Kjella ( 173770 ) on Wednesday February 29, 2012 @10:06AM (#39196657) Homepage

    I have only been staying in Stockholm for a month, but currently it gives me the feeling that Sweden and some other Europe countries have much more financial freedom than in US. If I were to create a startup based on alternative currencies ideas similar to Google's P2P money or Ripple, then Stockholm would be a much better place than Silicon Valley, all due to the absurd US anti-money laundering regulation.

    Oh, I wouldn't bet on it. I'm in Norway, not Sweden but both fairly socialist countries that depend heavily on income taxes and sales taxes. Strictly speaking you can use cash most everywhere, but it's getting more and more biased against it. The last item they've been pushing is electronic tickets for local buses, because they don't want neither bus drivers nor ticket machines getting robbed. You get heavy price incentives to use electronic cards or to pay over your cell phone - there's no such thing as an anonymous cell phone here by the way, that was outlawed quite a few years ago so it's all traceable back to me and there's no such thing as an anonymous debit cards either, they're all registered to your unique id. If I pay any person or company over 10k NOK - about $1800 - in cash during a year, I can be charged as co-conspirator in their tax fraud if they cheat on their taxes for doing nothing other than paying in cash.

    Another example is the employee cafeteria, there are several I know of that no longer take cash, either taking just plastic directly or through their own cards you can only charge with plastic. Even if you're a homeless crack addict you don't get food coupons anymore, you get an electronic card only valid in the grocery store - but not for beer. Honestly if it wasn't for a generation of elderly who insist on using cash I'm pretty sure we'd have pushed through a cashless society, because while we're not so heavy on the organized crime and terrorism propaganda, there's plenty of the tax fraud, black economy, anti-robbery propaganda with a good smear of if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

Ya'll hear about the geometer who went to the beach to catch some rays and became a tangent ?

Working...